BachmanL.PalmerA. (2010). Language assessment in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2.
BrownJ. D. (2000). University entrance examinations: Strategies for creating positive washback on English language teaching in Japan. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 3(2), 2–7. http://jalt.org/test/bro_5.htm
3.
BuckG. (1989). Written tests of pronunciation: Do they work?ELT Journal, 43(1), 50–56.
4.
ChengL.WatanabeY.CurtisA. (2004). Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5.
GuestM. (2008). A comparative analysis of the Japanese university entrance Senta Shiken based on a 25-year gap. JALT Journal, 30(1), 85–104.
6.
HermanJ. L. (2011). Discussion: Validity issues in moving ahead. Paper presented at International Symposium of Organization for the Study of College Admissions. National Center for University Entrance Examinations. Tokyo, Japan, November 18.
NishigooriD.KuramotoN. (2008). ‘Validity’ and ‘equality’ on English listening comprehension test which many candidates take: Analysis of cognition of high school students who participated in trial English listening comprehension test used IC player. CAHE Journal of Higher Education Tohoku University, 3, 77–90. Retrieved on August 1, 2012 from http://ir.library.tohoku.ac.jp/re/bitstream/10097/36815/1/cahe-3-07.pdf.
10.
ShirahataT. (1992). Validity of paper test problems on stress: Taking examples from Monbusho’s ‘Daigaku Nyuushi Center Shiken’ Bulletin of Faculty of Education, Shizuoka University, 23, 161–172. Retrieved on August 12, 2012 from http://ir.lib.shizuoka.ac.jp/bitstream/10297/2879/1/081211001.pdf.
11.
WatanabeY. (2010). Taming the external force of high-stakes language testing – identifying conditions under which tests work for improving EFL practices. In MoonY.SpolskyB. (Eds.) Language assessment in Asia: Local, regional or global? (pp. 27–52). Seoul: ASIA TEFL.