Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Language assessment literacy refers to language instructors’ familiarity with testing definitions and the application of this knowledge to classroom practices in general and specifically to issues related to assessing language. While it is widely agreed that classroom teachers need to assess student progress, many teachers and other test users have a limited understanding of assessment fundamentals. To help meet this need, a tutorial for foreign language instructors was developed (CAL, 2009) to describe the basics of language assessment and assist with test selection. In this project, group interviews and surveys were used to elicit feedback from two groups of experts, US language instructors (N = 44) and language testers (N = 30), on the content of the tutorial. The results of the project revealed the challenges of including the technical information considered essential by testers while meeting the real and practical needs of teachers. This paper investigates efforts to elicit language testers’ beliefs about measurement basics compared with those of language educators and suggests that expert beliefs about what is essential to include in such materials differ depending on the expert perspective.

Keywords

Assessment literacy language assessment literacy language teacher development tutorials

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alderson

J. C.

Huhta

(2005). The development of a suite of computer-based diagnostic tests based on the Common European Framework. Language Testing. 22(3), 301–320.

Bachman

L. F.

(2005). Building and supporting a case for test use. Language Assessment Quarterly, 2(1), 1–34.

Borg

(2009). English language teachers’ conceptions of research. Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 358–388.

Boyles

(2005). Assessment literacy. In Rosenbusch

(Ed.), National assessment summit papers (pp. 11–15). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.

CAL, http://www.cal.org/CALWebDB/FLAD/, accessed February 28, 2013.

Cavella

Malone

(2008). Teaching principles of assessment online. In Goertler

Winke

(Eds.), Opening doors through distance language education: Principles, perspectives, and practices. CALICO Monograph 7.

Chapelle

Enright

Jamieson

(2008). Building a validity argument for the Test of English as a Foreign Language. New York: Routledge.

Davies

(2008). Textbook trends in teaching language testing. Language Testing, 25(3): 327–347.

Dialang, www.lancs.ac.uk/researchenterprise/dialang/about.htm, accessed January 9, 2012.

10.

Dörnyei

(2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

11.

Fulcher

(2012). Assessment literacy for the language classroom. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(2), 113–132.

12.

Hesse-Biber

S. N.

Leavy

(2005). The practice of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

13.

Inbar-Lourie

(2008). Constructing a language assessment knowledge base: A focus on language assessment courses. Language Testing, 25, 328–402.

14.

Jackson

Malone

(2009). Building the foreign language capacity we need: Toward a comprehensive strategy for a national language framework. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.

15.

Jensen

(2007). National foreign language policy: A state language coordinator’s perspective. Modern Language Journal, 91(2), 261–264.

16.

Kenyon

D. M.

(1997). Further research on the efficacy of rater self-training. In Huhta

Kohonen

Kurki-Suonio

Luoma

(Eds.), Current developments and alternatives in language assessment: Proceedings of LTRC 96 (pp. 257–273). Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä.

17.

Kern

(2000). Literacy and language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

18.

Krueger

R. A.

(1998). Analyzing and reporting focus group results. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

19.

Krueger

R. A.

Casey

M. A.

(2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

20.

López Mendoza

A. A.

Bernal Arandia

. (2009). Language testing in Colombia: A call for more teacher education and teacher training in language assessment. PROFILE, 11(2), 55–70.

21.

Mackey

Gass

(2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

22.

Malone

M. E.

(2008). Training in language assessment. In Shohamy

Hornberger

(Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, Vol. 7: Language testing and assessment (2nd ed., pp. 225–233). New York: Springer Science and Business Media.

23.

National Education Association. (1983). Teachers’ views about student assessment. Washington, DC: Author.

24.

Nier

V. C.

Donovan

A. E.

Malone

M. E.

(2009). Increasing assessment literacy among LCTL instructors through blended learning. Journal of the National Council of Less Commonly Taught Languages, 9, 105–136.

25.

Popham

W. J.

(2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental? Theory into Practice, 48(1), 4–11.

26.

Rea-Dickins

(2007). Learning or measuring? Exploring teacher decision making in planning for classroom-based language assessment. In Fotos

Nassaji

(Eds.), Form-focused instruction and teacher education: Studies in honour of Rod Ellis (pp. 193–210). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

27.

Riestenberg

Di Silvio

Donovan

Malone

(2010). Development of a computer based workshop to foster assessment literacy. Journal of the Council of Less Commonly Taught Languages, 9, 22–41.

28.

Schafer

W. D.

(1993). Assessment literacy for teachers. Theory into Practice, 32(2), 118–126.

29.

Shepard

L. A.

(2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.

30.

Stiggins

R. J.

(1997). Student-centered classroom assessment. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

31.

Stoynoff

Chapelle

C. A.

(2005). ESOL tests and testing: A resource for teachers and program administrators. Alexandria, VA: TESOL Publications.

32.

Taylor

(2009). Developing assessment literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 21–36.

The essentials of assessment literacy: Contrasts between testers and users

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References