Relationship of TOEFL iBT® scores to academic performance: Some evidence from American universities

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between scores on the TOEFL Internet-Based Test (TOEFL iBT®) and academic performance in higher education, defined here in terms of grade point average (GPA). The academic records for 2594 undergraduate and graduate students were collected from 10 universities in the United States. The data consisted of students’ GPA, detailed course information, and admissions-related test scores including TOEFL iBT, GRE, GMAT, and SAT scores. Correlation-based analyses were conducted for subgroups by academic status and disciplines. Expectancy graphs were also used to complement the correlation-based analyses by presenting the predictive validity in terms of individuals in one of the TOEFL iBT score subgroups belonging to one of the GPA subgroups. The predictive validity expressed in terms of correlation did not appear to be strong. Nevertheless, the general pattern shown in the expectancy graphs indicated that students with higher TOEFL iBT scores tended to earn higher GPAs and that the TOEFL iBT provided information about the future academic performance of non-native English speaking students beyond that provided by other admissions tests. These observations led us to conclude that even a small correlation might indicate a meaningful relationship between TOEFL iBT scores and GPA. Limitations and implications are discussed.

Keywords

academic performance English proficiency grade point average international students predictive validity TOEFL

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Al-Musawi

N. M.

Al-Ansari

S. H.

(1999). Test of English as a Foreign Language and First Certificate of English tests as predictors of academic success for undergraduate students at the University of Bahrain. System, 27, 389–399.

Ayers

J. B.

Quattlebaum

R. F.

(1992). TOEFL performance and success in a master’s program in engineering. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 973–975.

Chalhoub-Deville

Deville

(2006). Old, borrowed, and new thoughts in second language testing. In Brennan

R. L.

(Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed.). Westport, CT: Praeger.

Fox

(2004). Test decisions over time: Tracking validity. Language Testing, 21(4), 437–465.

Graham

J. G.

(1987). English language proficiency and the prediction of academic success. TESOL Quarterly, 21(2), 505–521.

Hartnett

R. T.

Willingham

W. W.

(1980). The criterion problem: What measure of success in graduate education? Applied Psychological Measurement, 4(3), 281–291.

Heil

D. K.

Aleamoni

L. M.

(1974). Assessment of the proficiency in the use and understanding of English by foreign students as measured by the Test of English as a Foreign Language. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 093 948).

Institute for International Education (2007). Open doors: Report on international educational exchange. Retrieved October 23, 2007 from http://opendoors.iienetwork.org.

Kuncel

N. R.

Crede

Thomas

L. L.

(2007). A meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT) and undergraduate grade point average (UGPA) for graduate student academic performance. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(1), 51–68.

10.

Neal

M. E.

(1998). The predictive validity of the GRE and TOFEL exams with GGPA as the criterion of graduate success for international graduate students in science and engineering. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED424294).

11.

Powers

D. E.

Kim

H.-J.

Weng

V. Z.

(2008). The redesigned TOEIC (listening and reading) test: Relations to test-taker perceptions of proficiency in English (ETS Research Report no. RR-08-56). Princeton, NJ: ETS.

12.

Ree

M. J.

Carretta

T. R.

Earles

J. A.

Albert

(1994). Sign changes when correction for range restriction: A note on Pearson’s and Lawley’s selection formula. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 298–301.

13.

Rosenthal

Rubin

D. B.

(1982). A simple, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 166–169.

14.

Ross

(1998). Self-assessment in second language testing: A meta-analysis and analysis of experiential factors. Language Testing, 15(1), 1–20.

15.

Sackett

P. R.

Borneman

M. J.

Connelly

B. S.

(2008). High-stakes testing in higher education and employment: Appraising the evidence for validity and fairness. American Psychologist, 63(4), 215–227.

16.

Sackett

P. R.

Yang

(2000). Correction for range restriction: An expanded typology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 112–118.

17.

Schrader

W. B.

(1965). A taxonomy of expectancy tables. Journal of Educational Measurement, 2, 29–35.

18.

Sinharay

Powers

D. E.

Feng

Saldivia

Giunta

Simpson

Weng

(2009). Appropriateness of the TOEIC® Bridge test for students in three countries of South America. Language Testing, 26(4), 589–619.

19.

Van Nelson

Nelson

J. S.

Malone

B. G.

(2004). Predicting success of international graduate students in an academic university. College and University Journal, 80(1), 19–27.

20.

Vinke

A. A.

Jochems

W. M. G.

(1993). English proficiency and academic success in international postgraduate education. Higher Education, 26, 275–285.

21.

Wiberg

Sundstrom

(2009). A comparison of two approaches to correction of restriction of range in correlation analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 14(5), 1–9.

22.

Woodrow

(2006). Academic success of international postgraduate education students and the role of English proficiency. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 1, 51–70.

23.

Zwick

(2002). Fair game? The use of standardized admissions tests in higher education. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.