English language development or proficiency (ELD/P) standards promise to play an important role in the instruction and assessment of the language development of English language learner (ELL) pre-K-12 students, but to do so effectively they must convey the progression of student language learning in authentic school contexts for authentic academic purposes. The construct of academic English is defined as the vocabulary, sentence structures, and discourse associated with language used to teach academic content as well as the language used to navigate the school setting more generally. The construct definition is informed by a relatively modest number of empirical studies of textbooks, content assessments, and observations of classroom discourse. The standards of a state with a large ELL population and a large multi-state consortium are then reviewed to illustrate the role of the academic English construct in the standards’ coverage of language modalities or domains, levels of attainment or proficiency, grade spans, and the needs of the large number of young English learners. Recommendations and potential strategies for validating, creating, and augmenting standards that reflect authentic uses of academic language in school settings are also made.
Abedi, J., Hofstetter, C.H., & Lord, C. ( 2004). Assessment accommodations for English language learners: Implications for policy-based empirical research. Review of Educational Research, 74, 1-28.
2.
American Federation of Teachers (2003). Setting strong standards. Washington, DC: Author.
3.
Andersen, E.S. ( 1986). The acquisition of register variation in Anglo-American children. In B. B. Schieffelin & E. Ochs (Eds.), Language socialization across cultures (pp. 153-161). New York: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Anthony, J.L., & Lonigan, C.J. ( 2004). The nature of phonological awareness: Converging evidence from four studies of preschool and early grade school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 43-55.
5.
Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center ( 2009). Framework for high-quality English language proficiency standards and assessments. Prepared for the US Department of Education. San Francisco, CA: WestEd.
6.
Bailey, A.L. (in press). Academic English. In J. Banks (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Diversity in Education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
Bailey, A.L. ( 2007). Introduction: Teaching and assessing students learning English in school. In A. L. Bailey (Ed.), Language demands of school: Putting academic language to the test (pp.1-26). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
8.
Bailey, A.L. ( 2008). Assessing the language of young learners. In E. Shohamy & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education, Vol. 7: Language testing and assessment (pp. 379-398). Berlin: Springer.
9.
Bailey, A.L. ( 2010). Implications for assessment and instruction In M. Shatz & L. Wilkinson (Eds.), The education of English language learners (pp. 222-247), New York: Guilford Press.
10.
Bailey, A.L., & Butler, F.A. (2002 /3). An evidentiary framework for operationalizing academic language for broad application to K-12 education: A design document (CSE Tech. Rep. No.611). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST) .
11.
Bailey, A.L., Butler, F.A., Stevens, R., & Lord, C. ( 2007). Further specifying the language demands of School. In A. L. Bailey (Ed.), Language demands of school: Putting academic language to the test. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
12.
Bailey, A.L., & Heritage, M. ( 2008). Formative assessment for literacy, grades K-6: Building reading and academic language skills across the curriculum. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin/ Sage Press.
13.
Bailey, A.L., Huang, Y.D., Osipova, A., & Beauregard, S. (2010). Continuities and discontinuities in the academic language demands placed on young English language learners in preschool and kindergarten. Unpublished manuscript, UCLA.
14.
Beck, I.L., McKeown, M.G., & Kucan, L. ( 2002). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction . New York: Guildford Press.
15.
Bialystok, E., Majumder, S., & Martin, M.M. ( 2003). Developing phonological awareness: Is there a bilingual advantage? Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 27-44.
16.
Braze, D., Tabor, W., Shankweiler, D.P., & Mencl, W.E. ( 2007). Speaking up for vocabulary: reading skill differences in young adults. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 226-243.
17.
Bunch, M. (in press). Testing English language learners under No Child Left Behind . To appear in Language Testing: Special Issue.
18.
Butler, F.A., Bailey A.L., Stevens, R., Huang, B., & Lord, C. ( 2004). Academic English in Fifth-grade Mathematics, Science, and Social Studies textbooks. CSE Tech. Rep. No.642. Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
19.
Butler, F.A., Stevens, R., & Castellon, M. ( 2007). ELLs and standardized assessments: the interaction between language proficiency and performance on standardized tests. In A. L. Bailey (Ed.), The language demands of school: Putting academic English to the test. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
20.
California State Board of Education. (1998 ). English-Language Arts Content Standards for California Public Schools. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education.
21.
California State Board of Education. (1999 ). English-Language Development Standards for California Public Schools: Kindergarten through Grade Twelve. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education.
22.
California Department of Education (2008a). California English Language Development Test (CELDT), 2008-09 Edition. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education .
23.
California Department of Education (2008b). California Preschool Learning Foundations. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education.
24.
California Department of Education Educational Demographics Unit, (2009). Statewide English learners by language and grade, 2007-08. Retrieved 6/29/09 from http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/LEPbyLang1.
25.
Chalhoub-Deville, M., & Deville, C. ( 2008). Nationally mandated testing for accountability: English language learners in the US. In B. Spolsky and F. Hult (Eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics (pp. 510-522). Malden, MA : Blackwell.
26.
Chamot, A.U., & O’Malley, J.M. (1994). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
27.
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010 a). K-12 Common Core State Standards. Retrieved from CCSSI Website: www.corestandards.org/the-standards .
28.
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010 b). Application of Common Core State Standards for English Language Learners. Retrieved from CCSSI Website: www.nga.org/portal/site/nga/menuitem.50aeae5ff70b817ae8ebb856a11010a0
29.
Cummins, J. ( 1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49, 222-25l.
30.
Cummins, J. ( 1980). The construct of proficiency in bilingual children. In J. E. Alatis, (Ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics: Current Issues in Bilingual Education, 81-103.
31.
Davies, F., & Green, T. ( 1984). Reading for learning in the sciences. London: Oliver and Boyd and the Schools Council.
32.
Duncan, S.E., & De Avila, E.A. (1988). Language Assessment Scales (LAS) Reading and Writing Examiner’s Manual, Forms 1A and B, Forms 3A and B. Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw-Hill .
33.
Duncan, S.E., & De Avila, E.A. (1990). Language Assessment Scales (LAS) Reading Component, Forms 1A, 2A, and 3A. Monterey, CA: CTB/McGraw-Hill.
34.
Durgunoglu, A.Y. ( 2002). Cross-linguistic transfer in literacy development and implications for language learners. Annals of Dyslexia, 52, 189-204.
35.
Figueroa, R. ( 1990). Assessment of linguistic minority group children. In C. R. Reynolds & R. W. Kamphaus (Eds.), Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children: intelligence and achievement (pp. 671-696). New York: The Guilford Press.
36.
Figueroa, R.A., & Hernandez, S. ( 2000). Testing Hispanic students in the United States: Technical and policy issues. Washington, DC: President’s Advisory Commission on Educational Excellence for Hispanic Americans.
37.
Francis, D., Lesaux, N., & August, D. ( 2006). Language instruction. In D. August & T. Shanahan (Eds.), Developing literacy in second-language learners: Report of the National Literacy Panel on Language-Minority Children and Youth (pp. 365-413). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38.
Gándara, P. ( 2005). Fragile futures: Risk and vulnerability among Latino high achievers. Policy brief. Princeton, NJ: ETS.
39.
Gibbons, P. ( 1998). Classroom talk and the learning of new registers in a second language. Language and Education, 12(2), 99-118.
40.
Gόmez, E.L. ( 2000). A history of the ESL standards for Pre-K-12 students . In M. A. Snow (Ed.), Implementing the ESL standards for pre-K-12 students through teacher education . Washington, DC: TESOL.
41.
Gottlieb, M., Cranley, M.E., & Cammilleri, A. (2007). Understanding the WIDA English Language Proficiency Standards: A resource guide. Madison, WI: Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System.
42.
Grabe, W. ( 2004). Research on teaching reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 44-69.
43.
Kenyon, D.M., MacGregor, D., Li, D., & Cook, H.G. (In press). Issues in vertical scaling of a K-12 English language proficiency test. To appear in Language Testing: Special Issue.
Leung, C., & Mohan, B. ( 2004). Teacher formative assessment and talk in classroom contexts: Assessment as discourse and assessment of discourse. Language Testing, 21(3), 335-359.
46.
Lunzer, E., & Gardner, K. ( 1984). Learning from the written word. Oliver and Boyd and theSchools Council.
47.
Martinez, J-F., Bailey, A.L., Kerr D., Huang B.H.-H., & Beauregard S. ( 2010). Measuring opportunity to learn and academic language exposure for English language learners in elementary science classrooms. Report no.767. Los Angeles : University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
48.
Masters, G., & Foster, M. ( 1996). Progress maps. Melbourne Australia. The Australian Council for Educational Research.
49.
Mayer, J. ( 2007). Policy needs: What Federal and State governments need from language research. In A. L. Bailey (Ed.), The language demands of school: Putting academic English to the test. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
50.
McBride-Chang, C., Bialystok, E., Chong, K.K., & Li, Y. ( 2004). Levels of phonological awareness in three cultures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 89(2), 93-111.
51.
McKay, P. ( 2000). On ESL standards for school-age learners. Language Testing, 17(2), 185-217.
52.
McKay, P., Coppari, P., Cumming, A., Graves, K., Lopriore, L., & Short, D. ( 2000). Language standards: An international perspective, Part 2. TESOL Matters, 11(3), 1-6.
53.
McKay, P., Hudson, C., & Sapuppo, M. ( 1994). ESL Bandscales. In NLLIA ESL development: Language and literacy in schools project. Canberra: National Languages and Literacy Institute of Australia.
54.
Michaels, S. ( 1981). ‘Sharing time’: Children’s narrative styles and differential access to literacy. Language and Society , 10, 423-442.
55.
Nagy, W.E. ( 1988). Teaching vocabulary to improve reading comprehension . Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
56.
Nation, I.S.P. ( 2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
57.
National Alliance of Business (1995). Challenge of change: Standards to make education work for all our children . Washington, DC: Business Coalition for Education Reform.
58.
The National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition & Language Instruction Educational Programs (NCELA) ( 2006). The growing numbers of limited English proficient students: 1995/96-2005/06. Retrieved from www.ncela.gwu.edu/files/uploads/4/GrowingLEP_0506.pdf .
59.
No Child Left Behind (2001). No Child Left Behind. Title III: Language instruction for limited English proficient and immigrant students. 107th Congress , 1st Session, December 13, 2001. (Printed version prepared by the National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.) Washington, DC: George Washington University, National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.
60.
Peterson, C., & McCabe, A. (1983). Developmental psycholinguistics: Three ways of looking at a child’s narrative. New York: Plenum.
61.
RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward a research and development program in reading comprehension. Prepared for the Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI), U.S. Department of Education. Santa Monica, CA : RAND Education.
62.
Scarcella, R. ( 2003). Academic English: A conceptual framework ( Tech. Rep. No. 2003-1). Santa Barbara, CA: University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute.
63.
Scarcella, R., & Zimmerman, C. ( 1998). Academic words and gender: ESL student performance on a test of academic lexicon. Studies in Second Language Acquisition , 20, 27-49.
64.
Schleppegrell, M. ( 2001). Linguistic features of the language of schooling. Linguistics and Education, 12(4), 431-459.
65.
Schleppegrell, M.J. ( 2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
66.
Scott, J.A., & Nagy, W.E. ( 2004). Developing word consciousness. In J. F. Baumann & E. J. Kame’enui (Eds.), Vocabulary instruction: Research to practice (pp. 201-217). New York: The Guilford Press.
67.
Short, D. ( 1994). Expanding middle school horizons: Integrating language, culture, and social studies. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 581-608.
68.
Short, D.J. ( 2000). The ESL standards: Bridging the academic gap for English language learners. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED447728).
69.
Silliman, E.R., Wilkinson, L.C., & Brea-Spahn, M.R. (2004). Policy, practice imperatives for language and literacy learning: Who will be left behind? (pp. 97-129). In C. A. Stone, E. R. Silliman , B. J. Ehren, & K. Apel (Eds.), The Handbook of Language and Literacy: Development and Disorders. London: Guilford Press.
70.
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
71.
Spanos, G., Rhodes, N.C., Dale, T.C., & Crandall, J. ( 1988). Linguistic features of mathematical problem solving: Insights and applications. In R. Cocking & J. Mestre (Eds.), Linguistic and cultural influences on learning mathematics (pp. 221-240). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
72.
Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages ( 1997). ESL Standards for Pre-K-12 Students. Alexandria, VA: Author.
73.
Webb, N.L. ( 1997). Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education (Council of Chief State School Officers and National Institute for Science Education). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Education Research.
74.
Wida Consortium ( 2004). WIDA English Language Proficiency Standards. Madison, WI: State of Wisconsin.
75.
WIDA Consortium (2007). English Language Proficiency Standards for English Language Learners in Pre-Kindergarten through Grade 12. 2007 edition. Madison, WI: Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System.
76.
Wixson, K.K., Dutro, E., & Athan, R.G. ( 2003). The challenge of developing content standards. Review of Research in Education, 27, 69-107.
