Bailey, A.L., & Butler, F.A. ( 2003). An evidentiary framework for operationalizing academic language for broad application to K-12 education: A design document ( CSE Tech. Rep. No. 611). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST) .
2.
Belfield, C. ( 2010). Review of ‘Fostering Innovation and Excellence.’Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved from http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/fosteringinnovation .
3.
Brindley, G. ( 2001). Outcomes-based assessment in practice: Some examples of emerging insights. Language Testing, 18, 393-407.
4.
Broadfoot, P. ( 1996). Education, assessment, and society: A sociological analysis . Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.
5.
Chalhoub-Deville, M. ( 2009a). The intersection of test impact, validation, and educational reform policy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 118-131.
6.
Chalhoub-Deville, M. ( 2009b). Standards-based assessment in the U.S.: Social and educational impact. In L. Taylor and C. Weir (Eds.), Language testing matters: Investigating the wider social and educational impact of assessment (281-300) . New York: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Chalhoub-Deville, M., & Deville, C. ( 2006). Old, borrowed, and new thoughts in second language testing . In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed.) (pp. 517-530). Westport, CT: American Council on Education/ Praeger.
8.
Chalhoub-Deville, M., & Deville, C. ( 2008). National standardized English language assessments. In B. Spolsky & F. Hults (Eds.), Handbook of educational linguistics (510-522) . Oxford: Blackwell.
9.
Common Core State Standards Initiative (2010 ). Common standards. Retrieved from www.corestandards.org/.
10.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Public Law No. 89-10 (1965).
11.
Goals 2000: Education America Act. Public Law No. 103-227 (1994).
12.
Haertel, E.H., & Herman, J.L. ( 2005). A historical perspective on validity arguments for accountability testing. In J. L. Herman & E. H. Haertel (Eds.), Uses and misuses of data for educational accountability and improvement (National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook, Vol. 104, Part 2, pp. 1-34). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education. Distributed by Blackwell Publishing.
13.
Hamilton, L. ( 2003). Assessment as a policy tool. Review of Research in Education, 27, 25-68.
14.
Izumi, L. ( 2010). Washington doesn’t know best: The perils of federal control of education. Pacific Research Institute. Retrieved from www.pacificresearch.org/press/speech-washington-doesntknow-best-the-perils-of-federal-control-of-education .
15.
Klinger, D.A., DeLuca, C., & Miller, T. ( 2008). The evolving culture of large-scale assessments inCanadian education. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy , 76, 1-34.
16.
Klingner, J. ( 2010). Review of ‘Meeting the needs of English learners and other diverse learners.’Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved from http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/english-learners.
17.
Linn, R.L. ( 2005, 28 June). Conflicting demands of No Child Left Behind and state systems: Mixed messages about school performance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(33). Retrieved from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v13n33/ .
18.
Martineau, J.A., & Dean, V. ( 2010, October). A state perspective on enhancing assessment and accountability systems through systematic integration of computer technology . Paper presented at the Tenth Annual Maryland Assessment Conference, College Park, MD.
19.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2010). Retrieved from www. doe.mass.edu/boe/docs/0710/item1.html .
20.
Mathis, W.J. ( 2010). The ‘Common Core’ Standards Initiative: An Effective Reform Tool?Boulder, CO, and Tempe, AZ: Education and the Public Interest Center & Education Policy Research Unit . Retrieved from http://epicpolicy.org/publication/common-core-standards .
21.
Mathis, W.J., & Welner, K.G. ( 2010). Introduction: Assessing the research base for ‘A Blueprint for Reform.’Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved from http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/blueprint-introduction.
22.
Menken, K. ( 2008). English learners left behind: Standardized testing as language policy. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
23.
National Council on Educational Standards and Testing (NCEST). (1992). Raising standards for American Education: A Report to Congress, the Secretary of Education, the National Education Goals Panel, and the American People. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
24.
No Child Left Behind Act. Public Law No. 107-110, § 115 Stat. 1425 (2001).
25.
Ravitch, D. ( 2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York : Basic Books.
26.
Ravitch, D., & Mathis, W.J. ( 2010). Review of ‘College- and Career-Ready Students.’Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://nepc.colorado.edu/thinktank/review-college-and-career.
27.
Rotherham, A. ( 1999). Toward performance-based federal education funding: Reauthorization of the ESEA. Progressive Policy Institute. Retrieved from www.ppionline.org/ppi_ci.cfm?knlgA reaID=110&subsecID=136&contentID=1249.
28.
Rebell, M., & Wolff, J. ( 2008). Moving every child ahead: From NCLB hype to meaningful educational opportunity. New York: Teachers College Press.
29.
Rivera, C. ( 2008, May). Test accommodations for ELLs: Developing an ELL-responsive SEA policy to support local practice. Paper presented at the Immigrant and Refugee Education Directors Meeting, Council of Great City Schools. Retrieved from www.cgcs.org/conferences/Rivera.ppt.
30.
Rupp, A.A., & Vock, M. ( 2007). National standards in Germany: Methodological challenges for developing and calibrating standards-based tests. In D. Waddington, P. Nentwig , & S. Schanze (Eds.), Making it comparable: Standards in science education (pp. 173-198). Muenster: Waxmann.
31.
Shepard, L. ( 2008, March). Understanding learning (and teaching) progressions as a framework for language testing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Language Testing Research Colloquium, Denver, CO.
32.
Shohamy, E. ( 2001). The power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. London: Longman/Pearson Education.
33.
State of Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. (2010). 31-state consortium awarded RTTT assessment grant. Retrieved from www.k12.wa.us/SMARTER/PressReleases/RTTTAssessmentGrant.aspx.
34.
US Department of Education. (2010). ESEA reauthorization: A blueprint for reform. Retrieved from www.2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/blueprint/index.html.
35.
US Department of Education. (2010). A blueprint for reform: The reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Retrieved from www.2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/blueprint .
36.
US Department of Education. (2010). Diverse learners. Retrieved from www.2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/blueprint/faq/diverse-learners.pdf.
37.
Warren, B. ( 2010). Review of ‘A complete education’. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved from http://nepc.colorado.edu/thinktank/review-complete-education .
38.
Way, D., & Kirkpatrick, R. (2010, October). What states need to consider in transitioning to computer-based assessments from the viewpoint of a contractor. Paper presented at the Tenth Annual Maryland Assessment Conference, College Park, MD.
39.
Wixson, K.K., Dutro E., & Athan, R.G. ( 2003). The challenge of developing content standards. Review of Research in Education, 27, 69-107.
40.
Wolf, M.K., Farnsworth, T., & Herman, J. ( 2008). Validity issues in assessing English Language Learners’ language proficiency. Educational Assessment, 13, 80-107.
41.
Working Group on ELL Policy. (2010). Improving educational outcomes for English language learners: Recommendations for the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics. Retrieved from www.cal.org/topics/ell/ELL-Working-Group-ESEA.pdf .