Book Review: Language assessment in practice: Developing language assessments and justifying their use in the real world

Bachman L. (2002). Alternative interpretations of alternative assessments: Some validity issues in educational performance assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 21(3), 5–18.

Borsboom D. Mellenbergh G. van Heerden J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111, 1061–1071.

Brennan R. (2001). Generalizability theory. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Cronbach L. J. (1971). Test validation. In Thorndike R. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement, 2nd ed. (pp. 443–507). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

Cronbach L. J. (1988). Five perspectives on validity argument. In Wainer H. Braun H. (Eds.), Test validity (pp. 3–17). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cronbach L. J. Meehl P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.

Cureton E. E. (1951). Validity. In Lindquist E. F. (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 621–694). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

House E. R. (1980). Evaluating with validity. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

Kane M. (1992). An argument-based approach to validation. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 527–535.

Kane M. (2006). Validation. In Brennan R. (Ed.), Educational measurement, 4th ed. (pp. 17–64). Westport, CT: American Council on Education and Praeger.

Kunnan A. J. (2000). Fairness and justice for all. In Kunnan A. J. (Ed.), Fairness and validation in language assessment (pp. 1–14). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Linn R. L. (1997). Evaluating the validity of assessments: The consequences of use. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16(2), 14–16.

Linn R. L. (1998). Partitioning responsibility for the evaluation of the consequences of assessment programs. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17(2), 28–30.

Messick S. (1981). Evidence and ethics in the evaluation of tests. Educational Researcher, 10, 9–20.

Messick S. (1988). The once and future issues of validity. Assessing the meaning and consequences of measurement. In Wainer H. Braun H. (Eds.), Test validity (pp. 33–45). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Messick S. (1989). Validity. In Linn R. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement, 3rd ed. (pp. 13–103). New York: American Council on Education and Macmillan.

Messick S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequences in the validation of performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23, 13–23.

Mislevy R. Steinberg L. Almond R. (2003). On the structure of educational assessments. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1, 3–62.

Popham W. J. (1997). Consequential validity: Right concern – wrong concept. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16(2), 9–13.

Sackett P. R. (1998). Performance assessment in education and professional certification: Lessons for personnel selection? In Hakel M. D. (Ed.) Beyond multiple choice: Evaluating alternatives for traditional testing for selection (pp. 113–129). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Shepard L. A. (1993). Evaluating test validity. In Darling-Hammond L. (Ed.), Review of research in education, Vol. 19 (pp. 405–450). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

Shepard L. A. (1997). The centrality of test use and consequences for test validity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16(2), 5–8, 13, 24.

Toulmin S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Widdowson H. G. (2001). Communicative language assessment: The art of the possible. In Elder C. Brown A. Grove E. Hill K. Iwashita N. Lumley T. McNamara T. O’Loughlin K. (Eds.), Experimenting with uncertainty: Essays in honor of Alan Davies (pp. 12–21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.