The construct of anxiety is often believed to be the affective factor with the greatest potential to pervasively affect the learning process (Horwitz, 2001), and recent research has demonstrated that anxiety can mediate whether learners are able to notice feedback and subsequently produce output (Sheen, 2008). In order to reduce the negative effects of anxiety, researchers have suggested that computer-based interaction may be an ideal medium for communication and practice (Kern, 1995), although this hypothesis has yet to be tested empirically. The current study addresses this gap by comparing the effect of computer-mediated communication (CMC) vs. face-to-face communication (FTF) on learners’ state anxiety. Twenty-five learners of intermediate Spanish completed two information-gap tasks with their teacher in a within-subject, counterbalanced design. Learners’ state anxiety was measured halfway through and following each task via a state anxiety questionnaire, and a task preference questionnaire was administered after the treatment. Results demonstrate that — contrary to expectations — reported state anxiety was not significantly lower in the CMC mode than the FTF mode. In fact, learners’ reported state anxiety was comparable across modality. The use and implications of both interactional modes for foreign language learning contexts are discussed, as are students’ perceptions of interaction in the CMC and FTF modes.
Abrams, Z.I. ( 2003). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 157-67.
2.
Bailey, K. ( 1983). Competitiveness and anxiety in adult second language learning: Looking at and through the diary studies. In H. Seliger & M.H. Long (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in language learning (pp. 67-102). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
3.
Beauvois, M. ( 1992). Computer-assisted classroom discussion in the foreign language classroom: Conversation in slow motion. Foreign Language Annals, 25, 455-63.
4.
Chamorro-Premuzic, T. & Furnham, A. ( 2003). Personality traits and academic examination performance . European Journal of Personality, 17, 237-50.
5.
Chastain, K. ( 1975). Affective and ability factors in second language acquisition . Language Learning, 25, 153-61.
6.
Cheng, Y., Horwitz, E., & Schallert, D. ( 1999). Language anxiety: Differentiating writing and speaking components. Language Learning, 49, 417-46.
7.
Chun, D.M. ( 1994). Using computer networking to facilitate the acquisition of interactive competence. System, 22, 17-31.
8.
Darhower, M. ( 2002). Interactional features of synchronous computer-mediated communication in the intermediate L2 class: A sociocultural case study. CALICO Journal, 19, 249-77.
9.
Dörnyei, Z. ( 2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Dörnyei, Z. ( 2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Doughty, C. & Long, M.H. ( 2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning and Technology, 7, 50-80.
12.
Doughty, C. & Varela, E. ( 1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-38). New York: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Ellis, R. ( 2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
Ellis, R. ( 2008). The study of second language acquisition. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
Eysenck, M. ( 1979). Anxiety, learning and memory: A reconceptualization. Journal of Research In Personality, 13, 363-85.
16.
Givón, T. ( 1985). Function, structure, and language acquisition. In D.I. Slobin (Ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition: Volume 1 (pp. 1008-25). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
Gregersen T. & Horwitz, E. ( 2002). Language learning and perfectionism: Anxious and non-anxious language learners’ reactions to their own oral performance. The Modern Language Journal, 86, 562-70.
18.
Hauck M. & Hurd, S. ( 2005). Exploring the link between language anxiety and learner self-management in open language learning contexts. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, II, n.p.
19.
Horwitz, E. ( 2001). Language anxiety and achievement. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 112-26.
20.
Horwitz, E., Horwitz, B., & Cope, J. ( 1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70, 125-32.
21.
Iwasaki, J. & Oliver, R. ( 2003). Chat-line interaction and negative feedback. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 17, 60-73.
22.
Kelm, O. ( 1992). The use of synchronous computer networks in second language instruction: A preliminary report. Foreign Language Annals , 25, 441-545.
23.
Kern, R. ( 1995). Restructuring classroom interaction with networked computers: Effects on quantity and characteristics of language production. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 457-76.
24.
Kim, S.Y. ( 1998). Affective experience of Korean college students in different instructional contexts: Anxiety and motivation in reading and conversation courses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA.
25.
Kötter, M. ( 2003). Negotiation of meaning and codeswitching in online tandems . Language Learning and Technology, 7, 145-74.
26.
Krashen, S. ( 1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition . Oxford: Pergamon.
27.
Krashen, S. ( 1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
28.
Krashen, S. ( 2003). Explorations in language acquisition and use. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
29.
Lamy, M.N. & Hampel, R. ( 2007). Online communication in language learning and teaching . Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan .
30.
Lee, L. ( 2001). Online interaction: Negotiation of meaning and strategies used among learners of Spanish. ReCALL, 13, 232-44.
31.
MacIntyre, P.D. ( 1995). How does anxiety affect second language learning? A reply to Sparks and Ganschow. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 90-9.
32.
MacIntyre, P.D. ( 1999). Language anxiety: A review of the research for language teachers. In D.J. Young (Ed.), Affect in foreign language and second language learning (pp. 24-45). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
33.
MacIntyre, P.D. ( 2002). Motivation, anxiety and emotion in second language acquisition . In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 45-68). Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
34.
MacIntyre, P.D. & Gardner, R. ( 1989). Anxiety and second-language learning: Toward a theoretical clarification. Language Learning, 39, 251-75.
35.
MacIntyre, P.D. & Gardner, R. ( 1991a). Methods and results in the study of anxiety in language learning: A review of the literature. Language Learning, 41, 85-117.
36.
MacIntyre, P.D. & Gardner, R. ( 1991b). Language anxiety: Its relation to other anxieties and to processing in native and second languages. Language Learning , 41, 513-34.
37.
MacIntyre, P.D. & Gardner, R. ( 1994a). The subtle effects of induced anxiety on cognitive processing in the second language. Language Learning, 44, 283-305.
38.
MacIntyre, P.D. & Gardner, R. ( 1994b). The effects of induced anxiety on three stages of cognitive processing in second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 1-17.
39.
Mackey, A. ( 1999). Input, interaction and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557-87.
40.
Mackey, A. & Philp, J. ( 1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings?The Modern Language Journal, 82, 338-56.
41.
McDonough, K. ( 2005). Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners’ responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 79-103.
42.
McDonough, K. & Mackey, A. ( 2006). Responses to recasts: repetitions, primed production, and linguistic development. Language Learning, 56, 693-720.
43.
Ortega, L. ( 1997). Processes and outcomes in networked classroom interaction: Defining the research agenda for L2 computer-assisted classroom discussion . Language Learning and Technology, 1, 82-93.
44.
Parkinson, B. & Howell-Richardson, C. ( 1990). Learner diaries. In C. Brumfit & R. Mitchell (Eds.), Research in the language classroom (ELT Documents133, pp. 128-40). London: Modern English Publication and The British Council.
45.
Pellettieri, J. ( 2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence in the virtual foreign language classroom . In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59-86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Peterson, M. ( 1997). Language teaching and networking. System , 25, 29-37.
47.
Phillips, E.M. ( 1992). The effects of language anxiety on students’ oral test performance and attitudes. The Modern Language Journal , 76, 14-26.
48.
Robinson, P. ( 1995). Task complexity and second language narrative discourse . Language Learning, 45, 99-140.
49.
Robinson, P. ( 2001a). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22, 27-57.
50.
Robinson, P. ( 2001b). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287-318). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
Robinson, P. ( 2003). The cognition hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning. Second Language Studies, 21, 45-105.
52.
Robinson, P. ( 2005). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43, 1-32.
53.
Robinson, P. ( 2007a). Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, and perceptions of task difficulty . International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 191-213.
54.
Robinson, P. ( 2007b). Criteria for classifying and sequencing pedagogic tasks . In M. García-Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 7-27). Clevedon : Multilingual Matters.
55.
Robinson, P. & Gilabert, R. ( 2007). Task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, and second language learning and performance. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45, 161-76.
56.
Scovel, T. ( 1978). The effect of affect on foreign language learning: A review of the anxiety research. Language Learning, 28, 129-42.
57.
Sheen, Y.H. ( 2008). Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning . Language Learning, 58, 835-74.
58.
Shield, L. ( 2000). The nature and purpose of online conversations: A brief synthesis of current research. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 6, 19-52.
59.
Sparks, R.L. & Ganschow, L. ( 1991). Foreign language learning differences: Affective or native language aptitude differences? The Modern Language Journal , 75, 3-16.
60.
Sparks, R.L. & Ganschow, L. ( 1993a). The impact of native language learning problems on foreign language learning: Case study illustrations of the linguistic coding deficit hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 77, 58-74.
61.
Sparks, R.L. & Ganschow, L. ( 1993b). Searching for the cognitive locus of foreign language learning difficulties: Linking first and second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 77, 289-302.
62.
Sparks, R.L., Ganschow, L., & Javorsky, J. ( 2000). Déjà vu all over again: A response to Saito, Horwitz, and Garza. The Modern Language Journal, 84, 251-59.
63.
Spielberger, C. ( 1983). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory (Form Y) . Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
64.
Spielman, G. & Radnofsky, M. ( 2001). Learning language under tension: New directions from a qualitative study. The Modern Language Journal, 85, 259-78.
65.
Sullivan, N. & Pratt, E. ( 1996). A comparative study of two ESL writing environments: A computer-assisted classroom and a traditional oral classroom. System, 29, 491-501.
66.
Tobias, S. ( 1986). Anxiety and cognitive processing of instruction. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-related cognition in anxiety and motivation (pp. 35-54). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
67.
Toyoda, E. & Harrison, R. ( 2002). Categorization of text chat communication between learners and native speakers of Japanese. Language Learning and Technology , 6, 82-99.
68.
Tudini, V. ( 2003). Using native speakers in chat. Language Learning and Technology, 7, 141-59.
69.
Warschauer, M. ( 1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13, 7-26.
