Alptekin, A. (2002). Towards intercultural communicative competence in ELT. ELT Journal, 56(1), 57-64.
2.
Altenberg, B. (1998). On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word combinations. In A. P. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, analysis, and applications (pp. 101-122). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
Brown, A. (2003). Interviewer variation and the co-construction of speaking proficiency. Language Testing, 20(1), 1-25.
4.
Canagarajah, A.S. (2006). Changing communicative needs, revised assessment objectives: Testing English as an international language. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3(3), 229-242.
5.
Erman, B., & Warren, B. (2000). The idiom principle and the open choice principle . Text, 20(1), 29-62.
6.
ffrench, A. (2003). The change process at the paper level. Paper 5, Speaking. In C. J. Weir & M. Milanovic (Eds.), Continuity and innovation: Revising the Cambridge Proficiency in English Examination, 1913-2002 (pp. 367-471). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
Foot, M. (1999). Relaxing in pairs. ELT Journal , 53(1), 36-41.
8.
Galaczi, E. (2005). Upper Main Suite speaking assessment: Towards an understanding of assessment criteria and oral examiner behaviour. Research Notes, 20. UCLES. Retrieved January, 2009, from http://www.cambridgeesol.org/rs_notes/index.htm ., 16-19.
9.
Galaczi, E. (2008). Peer-peer Interaction in a speaking test: The case of the First Certificate in English Examination. Language Assessment Quarterly, 5(2), 89-119.
10.
Hall, J.K. (1995). (Re)creating our worlds with words: A sociohistorical perspective of face-to-face interaction. Applied Linguistics , 16(2), 206-232.
11.
Hoey, M. (2005). Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language . Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
12.
Hubbard, C., Gilbert, S., & Pidcock, J. (2006). Assessment processes in speaking tests: A pilot verbal protocol study. Research Notes, 24. UCLES. Retrieved January, 2009, from http://www.cambridgeesol.org/rs_notes/index.htm ., 14-19.
13.
Iwashita, N. (1996). The validity of the paired interview format in oral performance assessment. Melbourne Papers in Language Testing, 5(2), 51-66.
14.
Lazaraton, A., & Davis, L. (2008). A microanalytic perspective on discourse, proficiency, and identity in paired oral assessment. Language Assessment Quarterly, 5(4), 313-335.
15.
May, L. (2006). An examination of of rater orientations on a paired candidate discussion task through stimulated recall. Melbourne Papers in Language Testing, 11(1), 29-51.
16.
McNamara, T.F. (1997). `Interaction' in second language performance assessment: Whose performance? Applied Linguistics, 18(4), 446-466.
17.
Nakatsuhara, F. (2006). The impact of proficiency-level on conversational styles in paired speaking tests. Research Notes, 30. UCLES . Retrieved January, 2009, from http://www.cambridgeesol.org/rs_notes/index.htm., 15-20.
18.
Norton, J. (2005). The paired format in the Cambridge speaking tests . ELT Journal, 59(4), 287-297.
19.
O'Sullivan, B. (2002). Learner acquaintanceship and oral proficiency test pair-task performance. Language Testing, 19(3), 277-295.
20.
Pawley, A., & Syder, F. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191-226). London: Longman.
21.
Saville, N. (2003). The process of test development and revision within UCLES EFL. In C. J. Weir & M. Milanovic (Eds.), Continuity and innovation: Revising the Cambridge Proficiency in English Examination, 1913-2002 (pp. 57-120). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Saville, N., & Hargreaves, P. (1999). Assessing speaking in the revised FCE. ELT Journal, 53(1), 42-53.
23.
Swain, M. (2001). Examining dialogue: Another approach to content specification and to validating inferences drawn from test scores. Language Testing, 18(3), 275-302.
24.
Taylor, L. (2000). Investigating the paired speaking test format. Research Notes, 2. UCLES. Retrieved January, 2009, from http://www.cambridgeesol.org/rs_notes/index.htm ., 14-15.
25.
Taylor, L. (2003). The Cambridge approach to speaking assessment. Research Notes, 13. UCLES. Retrieved January, 2009, from http://www.cambridgeesol.org/rs_notes/index.htm ., 2-4.
26.
Ucles. (2002). Certificate of Proficiency in English handbook: Revised CPE specifications and sample papers . Cambridge: University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations.
27.
Ucles. (2008). Certificate of Proficiency in English: Handbook for teachers. Cambridge : University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations.
28.
Weir, C.J., & Milanovic, M. (2003). Continuity and innovation: Revising the Cambridge Proficiency in English Examination, 1913-2002. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
29.
Young, R., & Milanovic, M. (1992). Discourse variation in oral proficiency interviews . Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14(4), 403-424.