Brown, J. D.1997:
‘Computers in language testing: present research and some future directions.’Language Learning and Technology1,
44-59
. Available on the internet at http://www.polyglot.cal.msu.edu/llt/vol1num1/brown/default.html
2.
Chalhoub-Deville, M.
and
Deville, C.1999:
Computer adaptive testing in second language contexts
. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics19,
273-299
.
3.
Chapelle, C.1998: Construct definition and validity inquiry. In
Bachman, L. F.
and
Cohen, A. D.
, Interfaces between second language acquisition and language testing
research.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
, 32-70.
4.
Dunkel, P. A.1999:
Considerations in developing or using second/foreign language proficiency
computer adaptive tests
. Language Learning and Technology2,
77-93
. Available on the internet at http://www.polyglot.cal.msu.edu/llt/vol2num2/article4/index.html
5.
Fulcher, G.1995:
Variable competence in second language acquisition: a problem for research methodology
. System23,
25-33
.
6.
Skehan, P.1987: Variability in language testing. In
Ellis, R.
, editor, Second language acquisition in context.
Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall
, 195-206.
7.
Tarone, E.1998: Research on interlanguage variation. In
Bachman, L. F.
and
Cohen, A. D.
, editors, Interfaces between second language acquisition and language
testing research.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
, 71-89.