Using data gathered through a meta-analysis, this study tests a path model representing variables that relate to sexual coercion. Specifically, sex, attitudes toward women, past/current relationship, alcohol, coercion strategies, victim resistance, and rape justifiability were proposed and their effects examined. Results indicated that the level of actual or perceived coerciveness was a function of the level of coerciveness of the strategy, whether or not a prior relationship existed, whether alcohol was involved, if the victim resisted, if the rape was perceived as justifiable, and the attitude that person has toward women. The results suggest that determinations of whether a particular action is perceived as a rape or coerced depend on the attitudes of the person making the evaluation and the perception of the situation. Personal and social implications of these findings are discussed.
* Abbey, A. (1987). Misperceptions of friendly behavior as sexual interest: A survey of naturally occurring incidents. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 173-194.
2.
Allen, M. , Bourhis, J., Emmers-Sommer, T. M., & Sahlstein, E. (1998). Methods of reducing dating anxiety: A meta-analysis. Communication Reports, 11, 49-55.
3.
Allen, M. , D'Alessio, D., & Brezgel, K. (1995). A meta-analysis summarizing the effects of pornography II. Human Communication Research, 22, 258-283.
4.
Anderson, W. P. , & Cummings, K. (1993). Women's acceptance of rape myths and their sexual experiences. Journal of College Student Development, 34, 53-57.
5.
Atkeson, B. M. , Calhoun, K. M., & Morris, K. T. (1988). Victim resistance to rape: The relationships of previous victimization, demographics and situational factors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 18, 497-507.
6.
Bart, P. B. , & O'Brien, P. H. (1985). Stopping rape: Successful survival strategies. New York: Pergamon Press.
7.
Berger, R. J. , Searles, P., Salem, R. G., & Piene, B. A. (1986). Sexual assault in a college community. Sociological Focus, 19, 1-26.
8.
Bostwick, T. D. , & DeLucia, J. L. (1992). Effects of gender and specific dating behaviors on perceptions of sex willingness and date rape. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 11 (1), 14-25.
9.
Brady, E. C. , Chrisler, J. C., Hosdale, D. C., Osowiecki, T., & Veal, T. A. (1991). Date rape: Expectations, avoidance strategies, and attitudes toward victims. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 427-429.
10.
* Bridges, J. (1991). Perceptions of data and stranger rape: A difference in sex role expectations and rape-supportive beliefs. Sex Roles, 24, 291-307.
11.
* Briere, J., & Malamuth, N. (1983). Self-reported likelihood of sexually aggressive behavior: Attitudinal versus sexual explanations. Journal of Research in Personality, 17, 315-323.
12.
* Burgoyne, S. G., & Spitzberg, B. H. (1992, July). An examination of communication tactics used in potential date rape episodes. Paper presented at the International Society for the Study of Personal Relationships annual conference, Orono, Maine.
13.
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships16(5)
14.
Burrell, N. , Donohue, W., & Allen, M. (1990). The impact of disputants' expectations on mediation: Testing an interventionist model. Human Communication Research, 17, 104-139.
15.
Burt, M. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217-230.
16.
Burt, M. , & Albin, R. (1981). Rape myths, rape definitions, and probability of conviction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 212-230.
17.
* Byers, E., & Eno, R. (1991). Predicting men's sexual coercion and aggression from attitudes, dating history, and sexual response. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 4, 55-70.
18.
* Calhoun, L., Selby, J., & Warring, L. (1976). Social perceptions of the victim's causal role in rape: An exploratory examination of four factors. Human Relations, 29, 517-526.
19.
Check, J. V. , & Malamuth, N. M. (1983). Sex role stereotyping and reactions to depictions of stranger vs. acquaintance rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 344-356.
20.
* Chiu, L. (1990). The relationship of career goals and self-esteem among adolescents. Adolescence, 25, 593-597.
21.
Christopher, F. S. , & Frandsen, M. M. (1990). Strategies of influence in sex and dating. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 89-105.
22.
* Dull, T., & Giacopassi, D. (1987). Demographic correlates of sexual and dating attitudes: A study of date rape. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 14, 175-193.
23.
Duncan, O. (1975). Introduction to structural equation models. New York: Academic Press.
24.
Emmers, T. M. , & Allen, M. (1995, February). Resistance to sexual coercion behaviors: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the Western States Communication Association Convention, Portland, Oregon.
25.
Federal Bureau of Investigation (1992, August 30). Crime in the United States, 1991 (pp. 14-58). Washington, DC: United States Department of Justice.
26.
* Garcia, L., Milano, L., & Quijano, A. (1989). Perceptions of coercive sexual behavior by males and females. Sex Roles, 21, 569-577.
27.
* Haley, R. (1991). Predicting male undergraduate sexual coercion: Testing a two-factor inter-action model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
28.
Hamilton, M. , & Hunter, J. (1989). Path: A program for conducting path analysis using correlations. Unpublished computer program, East Lansing, MI.
29.
* Hamilton, M., & Yee, J. (1990). Rape knowledge and propensity to rape. Journal of Research in Personality, 24, 111-122.
30.
Harney, P. A. , & Muehlenhard, C. L. (1991). Factors that increase the likelihood of victimization. In A. Parrot & L. Bechhofer (Eds.), Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime (pp. 159-175). New York: Wiley.
31.
Hunter, J. (1980). Factor analysis. In P. Monge & J. Cappella (Eds.), Multivariate techniques in human communication research (pp. 132-167). New York, NY: Academic Press.
32.
Hunter, J. , & Schmidt, F. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33.
Jenkins, M. J. , & Dambrot, F. H. (1987). The attribution of date rape: Observer's attitudes and sexual experiences and the dating situation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17 (10), 875-895.
34.
* Kanin, E. J. (1967). An examination of sexual aggression as a response to sexual frustration. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 29, 428-433.
35.
Kleck, G. , & Sayles, S. (1990). Rape and resistance. Social Problems, 37, 149-162.
36.
Korman, S. K. (1983). Nontraditional dating behavior: Date initiation and date expense sharing among feminists and nonfeminists. Family Relations, 32, 575-581.
37.
Koss, M. P. (1985). The hidden rape victim: Personality, attitudinal, and situational characteristics. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 193-212.
38.
Koss, M. P. (1988). Hidden rape: Incidence, prevalence, and descriptive characteristics of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of college students. In A. W. Burgess (Ed.), Sexual assault (Vol. 2, pp. 3-25). New York: Garland.
39.
Koss, M. P. , & Dinero, T. E. (1989). Discriminant analysis of risk factors for sexual victimization among a national sample of college women. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 57, 242-250.
40.
Koss, M. P. , Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987). The scope of rape: Incidence and prevalence of sexual aggression and victimization in a national sample of higher education students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 162-170.
41.
* Koss, M., Leonard, K., Beezley, D., & Oros, C. (1985). Nonstranger sexual aggression: A discriminant analysis of the psychological characteristics of undetected offenders. Sex Roles, 12, 981-992.
42.
Kuhn, L. (1996). Exposing a woman-hating culture. In J. Anndrzejewski (Ed.), Oppression and social justice: Critical frameworks (5th ed., pp. 335-346). Needham Heights, MA: Simon and Schuster.
43.
* Lane, K., & Gwartney-Gibbs, P. (1985). Violence in the context of dating and sex. Journal of Family Issues, 6, 45-59.
44.
Law Enforcement Assistance Administration (1975). Criminal victimization in 13 American cities. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
45.
Levine, E. M. , & Kanin, E. J. (1987). Sexual violence among dates and acquaintances: Trends and their implications for marriage and family. Journal of Family Violence, 2, 55-65.
46.
Levine, T. , & McCroskey, J. (1990). Measuring trait communication apprehension: A test of rival measurement models of the PRCA-24. Communication Monographs, 57, 62-72.
47.
MacDonald, J. M. (1971). Rape: Offenders and their victims. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
48.
Mahoney, E. R. , Shively, M. D., & Traw, M. (1986). Sexual coercion and assault: Male socialization and female risk. Sexual Coercion and Assault, 1, 2-8.
49.
* Malamuth, N. (1986). Predictors of naturalistic sexual aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 953-962.
50.
* McCormick, N. (1979). Come-ons and put-offs: Unmarried students' strategies for having and avoiding sexual intercourse. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 4, 194-211.
51.
Mongeau, P. A. , & Carey, C. M. (1996). Who's wooing whom II?: An experimental investigation of date-initiation and expectancy violation. Western Journal of Communication, 60, 195-213.
52.
Mongeau, P. A. , Hale, J. L., Johnson, K. L., & Hillis, J. D. (1993). Who's wooing whom? An investigation of female initiated dating. In P. J. Kalbfleisch (Ed.), Interpersonal communication: Evolving interpersonal relationships (pp. 51-68). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
53.
* Mosher, D. L., & Anderson, R. D. (1986). Macho personality, sexual aggression, and reactions to guided imagery of realistic rape. Journal of Research in Personality, 20, 77-94.
54.
* Muehlenhard, C. L. (1988). Misinterpreted dating behaviors and the risk of date rape. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 6, 20-37.
55.
Muehlenhard, C. L. , & Cook, S. W. (1988). Men's self-reports of unwanted sexual activity. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 58-72.
56.
Muehlenhard, C. L. , & Falcon, P. L. (1991). Men's heterosexual skill and attitudes toward women as predictors of verbal sexual coercion and forceful rape. Sex Roles, 23, 241-259.
57.
* Muehlenhard, C. L., Friedman, D. E., & Thomas, C. M. (1985). Is date rape justifiable? The effects of dating activity, who initiated, who paid, and men's attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 297-310.
58.
Muehlenhard, C. L. , Goggins, M. F., Jones, J. M., & Satterfield, A. T. (1991). Sexual violence and coercion in close relationships. In K. McKinney & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Sexuality in close relationships (pp. 155-175). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
59.
Muehlenhard, C. L. , & Hollabaugh, L. C. (1988). Do women sometimes say no when they mean yes? The prevalence and correlates of women's token resistance to sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 872-879.
60.
* Muehlenhard, C. L., & Linton, M. A. (1987). Date rape and sexual aggression in dating situations: Incidence and risk factors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 186-196.
61.
Muehlenhard, C. L. , & Rodgers, C. S. (1998). Token resistance to sex: New perspectives on an old stereotype. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 443-463.
62.
Muehlenhard, C. L. , & Scardino, T. J. (1985). What will he think? Men's impressions of women who initiate dates and achieve academically. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32, 560-569.
63.
Muehlenhard, C. L. , & Schrag, J. L. (1991). Nonviolent sexual coercion. In A. Parrot & L. Bechhofer (Eds.), Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime (pp. 115-128). New York: Wiley.
64.
Parrot, A. (1990). Acquaintance rape and sexual assault. Holmes Beach, FL: Learning Publications.
65.
Pollard, P. (1992). Judgements about victims and attackers in depicted rapes: A review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 307-326.
66.
Poppen, P. J. , & Segal, N. J. (1988). The influence of sex and sex role orientation on sexual coercion. Sex Roles, 19 (11-12), 689-701.
67.
* Rapaport, K., & Burkhart, B. (1984). Personality and attitudinal characteristics of sexually coercive college males. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93, 216-221.
68.
Shotland, R. L. (1992). A theory of the causes of courtship rape: Part 2. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 127-143.
69.
* Shotland, R., & Goodstein, L. (1983). Just because she doesn't want to doesn't mean it's rape: An experimentally based causal model of the perception of rape in a dating situation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 220-232.
70.
Shotland, R. L. , & Goodstein, L. (1992). Sexual precedence reduces the perceived legitimacy of sexual refusal: An examination of attributions concerning date rape and consensual sex. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 756-764.
71.
Siegel, J. M. , Sorenson, S. B., Golding, J. M., Burnam, M. A., & Stein, J. A. (1989). Resistance to sexual assault: Who resists and what happens?American Journal of Public Health, 79, 27-31.
72.
Sigelman, C. K. , Berry, C. J., & Wiles, K. A. (1984). Violence in college students' dating relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 5, 530-548.
73.
Sprecher, S. , Hatfield, E., Cortese, A., Potapova, E., & Levitskaya, A. (1994). Token resistance to sexaul intercourse and consent to unwanted sexual intercourse: College students' dating experiences in three countries. Journal of Sex Research, 31, 125-132.
74.
Struckman-Johnson, C. (1988). Forced sex on dates: It happens to men, too. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 234-241.
75.
Ullman, S. E. , & Knight, R. A. (1993). The efficacy of women's resistance strategies in rape situations. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 23-28.
76.
* Walker, W., Rowe, R., & Quinsey, V. (1993). Authoritarianism and sexual aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1036-1045.
77.
* Wilson, W., & Durrenberger, R. (1982). Comparison of rape and attempted rape victims. Psychological Reports, 50, 198.
78.
Zillmann, D. , & Bryant, J. (1982). Pornography, sexual callousness, and the trivialization of rape. Journal of Communication, 32, 10-21.
