Dyadic perception between 108 older identical and same-sex fraternal twin pairs was examined using three different tasks: (i) an emotional sensitivity task, (ii) a Q-Sort rating of emotion-eliciting situations, and (iii) an assessment of each other's personality traits. Idiographic analyses related judgements of self and co-twin within and between twins. Projection approached the reliability of the judgements and was significantly higher than both empathic accuracy and actual similarity, suggesting that the process of dyadic perception was mainly shaped by projection. Significant correlations between empathic accuracy and projection were caused by the similarity of the twins in self-judgements. Empathic accuracy was much weaker once projection was controlled, indicating that twins had used valid projection to improve accuracy. Similarity-controlled projection was still high and reflected the fact that the twins overestimated their similarity to a large extent. Contrary to expectation but consistent across the three tasks, identical and fraternal twins differed neither in levels of actual similarity, empathic accuracy and projection, nor in similarity-controlled empathic accuracy and projection.
Acitelli, L. A. , Douvan, E., & Veroff, J. (1993). Perceptions on conflict in the first year of marriage: How important are similarity and understanding?Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 5-19.
2.
Acitelli, L. A. , Douvan, E., & Veroff, J. (1997). The changing influence of interpersonal perceptions on marital well-being among black and white couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 291-304.
3.
Ainslie, R. (1985). The psychology of twinship. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
4.
Baron, R. M. , & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
5.
Borkenau, P. , & Ostendorf, F. (1993). NEO-fünf-faktoren-inventar (Neo-FFI) nach Costa und McCrae [NEO-five-factor inventory (Neo-FFI) according to Costa and McCrae]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
6.
Buber, M. (1923). Ich und du [I and thou]. Leipzig, Germany: Insel.
7.
Caspi, A. , Herbener, E. S., & Ozer, D. J. (1992). Shared experiences and the similarity of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 281-291.
8.
Cronbach, L. J. (1955). Processes affecting scores on `understanding of others' and `assumes similarity'. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 177-193.
9.
Davis, M. H. (1994). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
10.
Gottman, J. M. (1981). Time-series analyses. A comprehensive introduction for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Griffin, D. , & Gonzalez, R. (1995). The correlational analysis of dyad-level data: Models for the exchangeable case. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 430-439.
12.
Hancock, M. , & Ickes, W. (1996). Empathic accuracy: When does the perceiver-target relationship make a difference?Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 179-199.
13.
Hendrick, S. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 93-98.
14.
Hoch, S. J. (1987). Perceived consensus and predictive accuracy: The pros and cons of projection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 221-234.
15.
Ickes, W. (1993). Empathic accuracy. Journal of Personality, 61, 587-610.
16.
Ickes, W. (Ed.). (1997). Empathic accuracy. New York: Guilford.
17.
Ickes, W. , Stinson, L., Bissonette, V., & Garcia, S. (1990). Naturalistic social cognition: Empathic accuracy in mixed-sex dyads. Joumal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 730-742.
18.
Ickes, W. , Tooke, W., Stinson, L., Baker, V. L., & Bissonette, V. (1988). Naturalistic social cognition: Intersubjectivity in same-sex dyads. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12, 58-86.
19.
Kenny, D. A. (1988) The analysis of data from two-person relationships. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (1st ed., pp. 57-78). Chichester: Wiley.
20.
Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception. A social relation analysis. New York: Guilford.
21.
Kenny, D. A. , & Acitelli, L. K. (1994). Measuring similarity in couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 8, 417-431.
22.
Kenny, D. A. , & Albright. L. (1987) Accuracy in interpersonal perception: A social relation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 390-402.
23.
Kenny, D. A. , Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analyis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (VoL 1, pp. 233-265). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
24.
Kraemer, H. C. (1984). Item selection for profiles: A reanalysis of an international profile of schizophrenia. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 297-309.
25.
Larzelere, R. E. , & Mulaik, S. A. (1977). Single-sample tests for many correlations. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 557-569.
26.
Levenson, R. E. & Gottman, J. M. (1983). Marital interaction: Physiological linkage and affective exchange. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 587-597.
27.
Levenson, R. W. , & Ruef, A. M. (1992). Empathy: A physiological substrate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 234-246.
28.
Levinger, G. , & Breedlove, J. (1966). Interpersonal attraction and agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 367-372.
29.
Malloy, T. E. , & Albright, L. (1990). Interpersonal perception in a social context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 419-428.
30.
Marangoni, C. , Garcia, S., Ickes, W., & Teng, G. (1995). Empathic accuracy in a clinically relevant setting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 854-869.
31.
McCartney, K. , Harris, M. J., & Bernieri, F. (1990). Growing up and growing apart. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 226-237.
32.
Pedersen, N. L. , McClearn, G. E., Plomin, R., Nesselroade, J. R., Berg, S., & DeFaire, U. (1991). The Swedish Adoption Twin Study of Aging: An update. Acta Geneticae Medicae et Gemellologiae, 40, 7-20.
33.
Plomin, R. (1986). Development, genetics, and psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
34.
Saudino, K. J. , McGuire, S., Reis, D., Hetherington, E. M., & Plomin, R. (1995). Parent ratings of EAS temperament in twins, full siblings, half siblings, and step siblings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 723-733.
35.
Schave, B. , & Ciriello, J. (1983). Identity and intimacy in twins. New York: Praeger.
36.
Sillars, A. L. , Folwell, A. L., Hill, K. C., Maki, B. K., Hurst, A. P., & Casano, A. C. (1994). Marital communication and the persistence of misunderstanding. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 11, 611-617.
37.
Sillars, A. L. , Pike, G. R., Jones, T. J., & Murphy, M. A. (1984). Communication and understanding in marriage. Human Communication Research, 10, 317-350.
38.
Simpson, J. A. , Ickes, W., & Blackstone, T. (1995). When the head protects the heart: Empathic accuracy in dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 629-641.
39.
Stinson, L. , & Ickes, W. (1992). Empathic accuracy in the interactions of male friends versus male strangers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 787-797.
40.
Thomas, G. , & Fletcher, G. O. (1997). Empathic accuracy in close relationships. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Empathic accuracy (pp. 194-217). New York: Guilford.
41.
Thomas, G. , Fletcher, G. O., & Lange, C. (1997). On-line empathic accuracy in marital interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 839-850.
42.
Vandell, D. L. (1990). Development in twins. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of Child Development (Vol. 7, pp. 145-174). London: Jessica Kingsley.
43.
Vehrs, W. (1986). Nicht-verbale erlebnisbeschreibung [Non-verbal self-description]. Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
44.
Wackman, D. B. (1973). Interpersonal communication and coorientation. American Behavioral Scientist, 16, 537-550.
45.
Waller, N. G. , & Shaver, P. R. (1994). The importance of nongenetic influences on romantic love styles. Psychological Science, 5, 268-274.
46.
Weinert, F. E. (Ed.). (1997). GOLD: Genetic oriented life span study in differential development. Paper 16/1997. Munchen: Max Planck-Institute for Psychological Research.
