Recent research has developed a good understanding of how maintenance behaviors are related to husbands’ and wives’ individual perceptions of marriage. Unfortunately, one of the limitations is that data have been collected from an individual spouse and may be misleading when applied to the relationship as a whole. The purpose of the present study was to test a procedure by which data collected from spouses can be used to examine joint couple-level concepts. Specifically, the study employs structural equation modeling with 129 married couples to examine the relationship between husbands’ and wives’ use of maintenance behaviors and joint couple-level constructs of marital quality. The final models for couple satisfaction, couple commitment, and couple love had good fits, indicating that individual use of maintenance behaviors has an influence upon couples’ marital quality. Also, wives’ overall use of maintenance behaviors had a stronger relationship with marital quality than did husbands’ use of maintenance behaviors.
Acitelli, L. K. (1992). Gender differences in relationship awareness and marital satisfaction among young married couples. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 102–110.
2.
Acock, A. , & Schumm, W. (1992). Analysis of covariance structures applied to family research and theory. In P. Boss, W. Doherty, R. LaRoosa, W. Schumm, & S. Steinmetz (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and methods (pp. 451–468). New York: Plenum.
3.
Baxter, L. A. , & Dindia, K. (1990). Marital partners’ perceptions of marital maintenance strategies. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 187–208.
4.
Bell, R. A. , Daly, J. A., & Gonzalez, C. (1987). Affinity-maintenance in marriage and its relationships to women’s marital satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 445–454.
5.
Bentler, P. M. , & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significant tests and goodness-of-fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.
6.
Burrell, N. , & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1990). Psychological reality of marital conflict. In D. Cahn (Ed.), Intimates in conflict (pp. 167–185). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
Canary, D. J. , & Stafford, L. (1992). Relational maintenance strategies and equity in marriage. Communication Monographs, 59, 243–267.
8.
Canary, D. J. , & Stafford, L. (1994). Maintaining relationships through strategic and routine interaction. In D. J. Canary & L. Stafford (Eds.) Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 3–21). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
9.
Dainton, M. , & Stafford, L. (1993). Routine maintenance behaviors: A comparison of relationship type, partner similarity and sex differences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 255–271.
10.
Dainton, M. , Stafford, L., & Canary, D. J. (1994). Maintenance strategies and physical affection as predictors of love, liking, and satisfaction in marriage. Communication Reports, 7, 89–98.
11.
Duck, S. (1994). Steady as (s)he goes: Relational maintenance as a shared meaning system. In D. J. Canary & L. Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 45–61). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12.
Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1990). Models of marital interaction. In H. Giles & W. P. Robinson (Eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 433–450). New York: Wiley.
13.
Godwin, D. D. , & Scanzoni, J. (1989). Couple consensus during marital joint decisionmaking: A context, process, outcome model. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 943–956.
14.
Guerrero, L. K. , Eloy, S. V., & Wabnik, A. I. (1993). Linking maintenance strategies to relationship development and disengagement: A reconceptualization. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 273–283.
15.
Hoyle, R. K. (1995). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In R. K. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 1–15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16.
Joreskog, K. , & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17.
Lund, M. (1985). The development of investment and commitment scales for predicting continuity of personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 3–23.
18.
Marston, P. J. , & Hecht, M. L. (1994). Love ways: An elaboration and application to relational maintenance. In D. J. Canary & L. Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance, pp. 187–202. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19.
Olson, D. H. , McCubbin, H. I., Barnes, H., Larsen, A., Muxen, M., & Wilson, M. (1989). Families: What makes them work (2nd edn.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
Ragsdale, J. D. (1996). Gender, satisfaction level, and the use of relational maintenance strategies in marriage. Communication Monographs, 63, 354–369.
21.
Schumm, W. R. , Paff-Bergen, L. A., Hatch, R. C., Obiorah, F. C., Copeland, J. M., Meens, L. D., & Bugaighis, M. A. (1986). Concurrent and discriminant validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 381–387.
22.
Stafford, L. (1994). Tracing the threads of spider webs. In D. J. Canary & L. Stafford (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 115–139). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
23.
Stafford, L. & Canary, D. L. (1991). Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 217–242.
24.
Szinovacz, M. E. (1983). Using couple data as a methodological tool: The case of marital violence. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 633–644.
25.
Teachman, J. D. , Carver, K., & Day, R. (1995). A model for the analysis of paired data. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 1011–1024.
26.
Thomson, E. , & Williams, R. (1982). Beyond wives’ family sociology: A method for analyzing couple date. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, November, 999–1008.
27.
Weigel, D. J. , & Ballard-Reisch, D. S. (1996). Relationship maintenance, commitment and satisfaction in marriages: Gender and marital life course issues. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Speech Communication Association, San Diego, CA.
28.
Wood, J. T. (1995). Relational communication: Continuity and change in personal relationships. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
