This work uses samples of 285 college students and their mothers to offer validity to a fourth attachment style and to test a new hypothesis: that partners would be preferred as a function of their potential for providing a secure attachment bond. Profiles exemplifying four attachment styles of potential partners were rated by the participants for degree of preference and degree of similarity to current partners. Consistent with the attachment-security hypothesis, Secure partners were preferred across all attachment styles in both samples, followed by Preoccupied, Avoidant, and finally Ambivalent partners. Current partners were rated as more secure than insecure, but the more secure the rater, the more secure they rated their partners. We propose an alternative organizing principle for the study of partner preference, using attachment theory rather than either of the traditional explanatory mechanisms, similarity or complementarity.
Ainsworth, M.D.S. (1985) `Attachment Across the Lifespan', Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine61: 792-811.
2.
Bartholomew, K. (1990) `Avoidance of Intimacy: An Attachment Perspective', Journal of Social and Personal Relationships7: 147-178.
3.
Bartholomew, K. & Horowitz, L.M. (1991) `Attachment Styles in Young Adults: A Test of a Model', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology61: 226-244.
4.
Bowlby, J. (1973) Attachment and Loss, Vol. 2: Separation; Anxiety and Anger. New York: Basic Books.
5.
Brennan, K.A. & Shaver, P.R. (1995) `Dimensions of adult attachment, affect regulation, and romantic relationship functioning', Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin21, 267-283.
6.
Brennan, K.A. , Shaver, P.R. & Tobey, A.E. (1991) `Attachment Styles, Sex, and Parental Problem Drinking', Journal of Social and Personal Relationships8: 451-466.
7.
Buss, D.M. (1994) The Evolution of Desire. New York: Basic Books.
8.
Byrne, D. (1971) The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
9.
Carnelley, K. [Fiala]. (1991) `Attachment and the Psychosocial Functioning of Depressed, Remitted Depressed, and Non-depressed Women and their Partners', Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Chappell, K.D. & Davis, K.E. (1993) `Working Models of Attachment and Partner Choice: Effects of Partner and Attachment Style'. Paper presented at National Council on Family Relations, annual meeting, Baltimore, MD, November.
12.
Cicchetti, D. , Toth, S.L. & Lynch, M. (1995) `Bowlby's Dream Comes Full Circle: The Application of Attachment Theory to Risk and Psychopathology', in T.H. Ollendick & R.J. Prinz (eds) Advances in Clinical Child Psychology17, pp. 1-75.
13.
Collins, N.L. & Read, S.J. (1990) `Adult Attachment, Working Models, and Relationship Quality in Dating Couples', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology58: 644-663.
14.
Crittenden, P.M. (1988) `Relationships at Risk', in J. Belsky & T. Nezworski (eds) Clinical Implications of Attachment, pp. 136-174. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
Davis, K.E. & Latty-Mann, H. (1987) `Love Styles and Relationship Quality: A Contribution to Validation', Journal of Social and Personal Relationships4: 409-429.
Duck, S.W. & Sants, H.K.A. (1983) `On the Origin of the Specious: Are Personal Relationships Really Interpersonal States?', Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology1: 27-41.
18.
Dutton, D. (1995) The Domestic Assault of Women (revised & expanded edn). Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
19.
Hazan, C. & Shaver, P. (1987) `Romantic Love Conceptualized as an Attachment Process', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology52: 511-524.
20.
Jagger, M. & Richards, K. (1969) `You can't always get what you want', Let it bleed AKO (LP) 8004-1.
21.
Kalick, S.M. & Hamilton, T.E. (1986) `The Matching Hypothesis Reexamined', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology52: 673-682.
22.
Kirkpatrick, L.A. & Davis, K.E. (1994) `Attachment Style, Gender, and Relationship Stability: A Longitudinal Analysis', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology66: 502-512.
23.
Kobak, R. & Hazan, C. (1991) `Attachment in Marriage: Effects of Security and Accuracy of Working Models', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology60: 861-869.
24.
Latty-Mann, H. (1989) `The Influence of Family of Origin Dynamics on the Etiology of Adult Attachment Styles and Love Styles: With Special Focus on Adult Children of Alcoholics (ACoAs)'. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
25.
Latty-Mann, H. (1991) `An Intergenerational Approach to Studying the Influence of Family of Origin Dynamics on the Etiology of Adult Romantic Attachment Styles: With Special Focus on Adult Children of Alcoholics (ACoAs)'. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC.
26.
Levy, M.B. & Davis, K.E. (1988) `Lovestyles and Attachment Styles Compared: Their Relations to each other and to Various Relationship Characteristics', Journal of Social and Personal Relationships5: 439-471.
27.
Main, M. & Solomon, J. (1990) `Procedures for Identifying Insecure-Disoriented/Disorganized Infants: Procedures, Findings, and Implications for the Classification of Behavior', in M. Greenberg, D. Cicchetti & M. Cummings (eds) Attachment in the Preschool Years: Theory, Research and Intervention. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
28.
Murstein, B.I. (1987) `A Clarification and Extension of the SVR Theory of Dyadic Pairing', Journal of Marriage and the Family49: 929-947.
29.
Senchak, M. & Leonard, K.E. (1992) `Attachment Styles and Marital Adjustment among Newlywed Couples', Journal of Social and Personal Relationships9: 51-64.
30.
Shaver, P.R. & Hazan, C. (1988) `A Biased Overview of the Study of Love', Journal of Social and Personal Relationships5: 473-501.
31.
Zeifman, D. & Hazan, C. (in press) `A Process Model of Adult Attachment Formation', in S.W. Duck (ed.) The Handbook of Personal Relationships, 2nd edn.Chichester: Wiley.
