A review of the literature demonstrates that `relationship thinking' is a central factor influencing the behavior of personal relationship participants. The present investigation examined the psychometric properties of an instrument designed to assess individual levels of relational cognition complexity, a structural quality of relationship thinking. Scores obtained via the Relational Cognition Complexity Instrument (RCCI) were found to have moderate 1-week test-retest reliability and high internal consistency. They were also found to have discriminant validity relative to measures of person cognition complexity and verbal intelligence. Male relationship partners were also found to score significantly lower on the RCCI than were female relationship partners.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Acitelli, L. K. (1986) `The Influence of Relationship Awareness on Perceived Marital Satisfaction and Stability' (Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan), Dissertation Abstracts International 47(10): 4340. (University Microfilms No. 87-02, 670.)
2.
Acitelli, L.K. (1988) `When Spouses Talk to Each Other about Their Relationship', Journal of Social and Personal Relationships5: 185-200.
3.
Allard, M.J. & Carlson, E.R. (1963) `The Generality of Cognitive Complexity', Journal of Social Psychology87: 33-104.
4.
Anderson, J.R. (1983) The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
Beatty, M.J. & Payne, S.K. (1984) `Loquacity and Quantity of Constructs as Predictors of Social Perspective Taking', Communication Quarterly32: 207-210.
6.
Berger, C.R. & Bell, R.A. (1988) `Plans and the Initiation of Social Relationships', Human Communication Research15: 217-235.
7.
Bernal, G. & Baker, J. (1979) `Toward a Metacommunicational Framework of Couple Interactions', Family Process18: 293-302.
8.
Burleson, B. & Waltman, M.S. (1988) `Cognitive Complexity: Using the Role-Category Questionnaire Measure', in C. Tardy (ed.) A Handbook for the Study of Human Communication: Methods and Instruments for Observing, Measuring, and Assessing Communication Processes, pp. 1-36. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
9.
Burnett, R. (1984) `Thinking and Communicating About Personal Relationships: Some Sex Differences', paper presented at the Second International Conference on Personal Relationships, Madison, WI.
10.
Carmines, E.G. & Zeller, R.A. (1979) Reliability and Validity Assessment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
Cate, R. , Koval, J. & Lloyd, S. (1989) `The Measurement of Relationship Consciousness', unpublished manuscript, Washington State University.
12.
Crockett, W.H. (1965) `Cognitive Complexity and Impression Formation', in B.A. Maher (ed.) Progress in Experimental Personality Research, Vol. 2, pp. 47-90. New York: Academic Press.
13.
Crockett, W.H. , Press, A.N., Delia, J.G. & Kenney, C.J. (1974) `The Structural Analysis of the Organization of Written Impressions', unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
14.
Cupach, W. & Metts, S. (1986) `Accounts of Relational Dissolution: A Comparison of Marital and Non-marital Relationships', Communication Monographs53: 311-334.
15.
Duck, S.W. & Pond, K. (1989) `Friends, Romans, Countrymen, Lend Me Your Retrospections: Rhetoric and Reality in Personal Relationships', in C. Hendrick (ed.) Close Relationships, pp. 17-38 (Review of Social Behavior and Personality, Vol. 10). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16.
Higgins, E.T. , King, G.A. & Mavin, G.H. (1982) `Individual Construct Accessibility and Subjective Impressions and Recall', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology43: 35-47.
17.
Marks, S.R. (1986) Three Corners: Exploring Marriage and The Self. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
18.
Martin, R.W. (1989a) `Relational Cognition Complexity and Communication in Personal Relationships' (Doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa), Dissertation Abstracts International 50(9): 2705. (University Microfilms No. 90-04, 931.)
19.
Martin, R. (1989b) `Personal Relationship Cognition and Relational Communication: Is There a Preference for Probabilistic Playfulness?', paper presented at the Annual Speech Communication Association Convention, San Francisco.
20.
Martin, R. (1990a) `We Can Work It Out: Relationship Thinking and Conflict in Personal Relationships', paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Personal Relationships, Oxford University, UK.
21.
Martin, R. (1990b) `A Lag-sequential Analysis of Relational Communication in Married Couples: What is the Role of Relational Cognition Complexity?', paper presented at the Annual Speech Communication Association Convention, Chicago, IL.
22.
Neimeyer, G.J. (1984) `Cognitive Complexity and Marital Satisfaction', Journal of Clinical and Social Psychology2: 258-263.
23.
O'Keefe, D.J. & Sypher, H.E. (1981) `Cognitive Complexity Measures and the Relationship of Cognitive Complexity to Communication', Human Communication Research8: 72-92.
24.
Raush, H.L. , Barry, W.A., Hertel, R.K. & Swain, M.A. (1974) Communication, Conflict and Marriage. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
25.
Rogers, L.E. & Farace, R.V. (1975) `Analysis of Relational Communication in Dyads: New Measurement Procedures', Human Communication Research1: 222-239.
26.
Sypher, H.E. & Applegate, J. (1984) `Organizing Communication Behavior: The Role of Schemas and Constructs', in R.N. Bostrom (ed.) Communication Year-book, Vol. 8, pp. 310-329. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
