The Day-to-Day Functioning of Close versus Casual Friendships

Abstract

Sixty five undergraduates maintained daily records of their interactions with two same-sexed target friends (one casual friend and one close friend) for a one week period. Data concerned structural (e.g. time, location, initiator) and functional (e.g. degree to which various costs and benefits were experienced, perceived effect of the interaction) aspects of the interactions. Compared to casual friends, close friends were found to interact more frequently, to interact across a greater range of settings and to describe their interactions as being more exclusive and providing more benefits (particularly emotional and informational support). Social exchange dynamics were found to vary for casual versus close friendships. Most strikingly, costs appeared to be weighted more heavily when interacting with casual friends than with close friends. However, for both close and casual dyads, the amount of fun and relaxation experienced with one's friend was the variable most correlated with evaluations of friendship progression. Gender differences in interaction patterns also emerged.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Altman, I. & Taylor, D.A. (1973) Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Argyle, M. & Henderson, M. (1984) 'The Rules of Friendship', Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 1: 211-237.

Baxter, L.A. & Wilmot, W.W. (1986) 'Interaction Characteristics of Disengaging, Stable and Growing Relationships', in R. Gilmour & S.W. Duck (eds) The Emerging Field of Personal Relationships. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Byrne, D. & Clore, G.L. (1970) 'A Reinforcement Model of Evaluative Responses', Personality: An International Journal 1: 103-128.

Caldwell, M.A. & Peplau, L.A. (1982) 'Sex Differences in Same-sex Friendships', Sex Roles 8: 721-732.

Clark, M.S. & Mills, J. (1979) 'Interpersonal Attraction in Exchange and Communal Relationships', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37: 12-24.

Davis, K.E. & Todd, M. (1982) 'Friendship and Love Relations', Advances in Descriptive Psychology 2: 79-122.

Duck, S.W. (1986) Human Relationships. London: Sage.

Duck, S.W. & Miell, D. (1986) 'Charting the Development of Personal Relationships', in R. Gilmour & S.W. Duck (eds) The Emerging Field of Personal Relationships. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

10.

Duck, S.W. & Sants, H.K.A. (1983) 'On the Origin of the Specious: Are Personal Relationships Really Interpersonal States?' Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 1: 27-41.

11.

Eidelson, R.J. (1980) 'Interpersonal Satisfaction and Level of Involvement: A Curvilinear Relationship'. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39: 460-470.

12.

Hays, R.B. (1985) 'A Longitudinal Study of Friendship Development', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48: 909-924.

13.

Hays, R.B. (1988) 'Friendship', in S.W. Duck (ed.) Handbook of Personal Relationship. London: Wiley.

14.

Jones, E.E. & Davis, K.G. (1965) 'From Acts to Dispositions: The Attribution Process in Person Perception', in L. Berkowitz (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2. New York: Academic Press.

15.

Kanouse, D.E. & Hanson, L.R. (1972) 'Negativity in Evaluations', in E.E. Jones , D.E. Kanouse , H.H. Kelley , R.E. Nisbett , S. Valins & B. Weiner (eds) Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

16.

Kelley, H.H. (1979) Personal Relationships. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

17.

Kelley, H.H. , Berscheid, E. , Christensen, A. , Harvey, J.H. , Huson, L. , Levinger, G. , McClintock, E. , Peplau, L.A. & Peterson, D.R. (1983) Close Relationships. Chicago: Aldine.

18.

Rodin, M.J. (1982) 'Non-eiigagcment. Fait;;. to Engage, and Disengagement', in S.W. Duck (ed.) Personal Relationships 4: Dissolving Personal Relationships. London: Academic Press.

19.

Slovic, P. & Lichenstein, S. (1968) 'Relative Importance of Probabilities and Payoffs in Risk Taking', Journal of Experimental Psychology 78: 143-156.

20.

Thibaut, J.W. & Kelley, H.H. (1959) The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: Wiley.

21.

Walster, E. , Walster, G.W. & Berscheid, E. (1978) Equity: Theory and Research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

22.

Watzlawick, P. , Beavin, J.H. & Jackson, D.D. (1967) The Pragmatics of Human Communication. New York: Norton.

23.

Wheeler, L. & Nezlek, J. (1977) 'Sex differences in social participation', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35: 742-754.

24.

Wheeler, L. , Reis, H.T. & Nezlek, J. (1983) 'Loneliness, Social Interaction, and Sex Roles', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45: 943-953.