This paper presents a model of the construction of social reality through human interaction. Human interactants are characterized as creating (realizing) the facts they come to believe about themselves. This creative process occurs during interpersonal interactions in which both desirable and/or undesirable facts emerge. A case study of a couple in therapy demonstrates the process through which a husband and wife have created many undesirable facts between them while denying that several desirable facts happen between them. A discussion of the power and responsibility involved in realizing interpersonal experiences follows the case study analysis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Austin, J.C. (1962) How to Do Things with Words. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Bateson, G. , Jackson, D., Haley. J& Weakland, J. (1956) `Toward a Theory of Schizophrenia', Behavioral Science1: 251-264.
3.
Cronen, V.E. , Pearce, W.B. & Snavely, L. (1979) `A Theory of Rules Structure and Episode Types and a Study of Perceived Enmeshment in Unwanted Repetitive Patterns', in D. Nimmo (ed.) Communication Yearbook III. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
4.
Delia, J. (1974) `Cognitive Complexity and Impression Formation in Informal Social Interaction', Speech Monographs41: 299-308.
5.
Feffer, M. & Gourevitch, B. (1960) `Cognitive Aspects of Role Taking in Children', Journal of Personality28: 283-306.
6.
Harré, R. & Secord, P. (1973) The Explanation of Social Behavior. Totowa, NJ: Littleheld & Adams.
7.
Harris, L.M. (1980a) `Analysis of a Paradoxical Logic: A Case Study', Family Process19: 19-33.
8.
Harris, L.M. (1980b) `Making a Case for Case Studies: Towards a Synthesis of Nomothetic and Ideographic Methodologies in the 1980s', paper presented at the Annual Speech Communication Association Convention (November).
9.
Harris, L.M. & Berlin, D. (1982) `Metatheoretical Considerations for Family Theory: An Apology to Families', paper presented at the National Conference on Family Relations, Theory Construction and Research Methodology, Pre-Conference Workshop (October).
10.
Harris, L.M. & Straus, M. (1980) `Demystifying the Double Bind: Patterned Disorder in Domestic Violence', paper presented at the National Council on Family Relations Annual Meeting (October).
11.
Harris, M. (1974) `Why a Perfect Knowledge of All the Rules One Must Know to Act Like a Native Cannot Lead to the Knowledge of How Natives Act', Journal of Anthropological Research30: 242-252.
12.
Kantor, D. & Lehr, W. (1975) Inside the Family. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13.
Pearce, W.B. & Cronen, V.W. (1980) Communication, Action and Meaning: The Social Construction of Reality. New York: Praeger.
14.
Searle, J. (1969) Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
Turner, R. (1956) `Role-Taking, Role Standpoint, and Referential Group Behavior', American Journal of Sociology61: 316-328.
16.
Turner, V. (1982) From Ritual to Theatre: The Human Seriousness of Play. New York: Performing Arts Journal Publications.
17.
Watzlawick, P. (1976) How Real Is Rea?New York: Random House.
18.
Watzlawick, P. , Beavin, J. & Jackson, D. (1967) Pragmatics of Human Communication. New York: Norton.
19.
Weinstein, E.A. (1969) `The Development of Interpersonal Competence', in D.A. Goslin (ed.) Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
20.
Wiemann, J. (1977) `Explanation and Test for a Model of Communication Competence', Human Communication Research3: 195-213.
