It is argued that relationship theory is a reflection of modern developments in causal theory, away from Newtonian efficient causation to formal causation in the theories of subatomic physics. Mechanistic psychological explanation has foundered on the fact that there are no underlying efficient causes to be found to account for the ultimate patterning of behaviours into relationships. Psychologists no longer need to `reduce' descriptions of personal relationships to underlying efficient-cause determinants. Theories of personal relationship are fundamentally teleological in assumption and descriptive style. It is shown how the formal-cause conception is a necessary but not sufficient ingredient to telic description. Final causation is required to capture human teleology, and thanks to dialectical reasoning we have a way of accounting for such agential behaviour. The paper closes with a survey of logical learning theory, which is offered in this context as a useful teleological formulation in the description of personal relationships.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adler, A. (1968). The Practice and Theory of Individual Psychology. Littlefield, Adams & Co.: Totowa, NJ.
2.
Aristotle . (1952a) `Posterior analytics'. In R.M. Hutchins (ed.), Great Books of the Western World (Vol. 8) (pp. 95-137). Encyclopedia Britannica: Chicago.
3.
Aristotle . (1952b). `Topics'. In R.M. Hutchins (ed.), Great Books of the Western World (Vol. 8) (pp. 143-223). Encyclopedia Britannica: Chicago.
4.
Bandura, A. (1979). `Self-referent mechanisms in social learning theory'. American Psychologist (34), 439-442.
5.
Berger, C.R. (1980). `Self-consciousness and the adequacy of theory and research into relationship development'. Western Journal of Speech Communication. (44), 93-96.
6.
Berne, E. (1964). Games People Play. The Psychology of Human Relationships. Grove Press, Inc.: New York.
7.
Bohr, N. (1934). Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature. The University Press: Cambridge.
8.
Brewer, W.F. (1974). `There is no convincing evidence for operant or classical conditioning in adult humans'. In W.B. Weimer & D.S. Palermo (eds), Cognition and the Symbolic Processes. Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.
9.
Burtt, E.A. (1955). The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science (rev. ed.) Doubleday & Co.: Garden City, NY.
10.
Cassirer, E. (1950). The Problem of Knowledge. Yale University Press: New Haven, CT.
11.
de Broglie, L. (1949). `A general survey of the scientific work of Albert Einstein'. In P. Schilpp (ed.), Albert Einstein, Philosopher Scientist (Vol. 1). Harper & Row: New York.
12.
DeNike, L.D. (1964). `The temporal relationship between awareness and performance in verbal conditioning'. Journal of Experimental Psychology (68) 521-529.
13.
Duck, S.W. (1977). The Study of Acquaintances. Gower Press: Aldershot, England.
14.
Duck, S.W. (1980). `Personal relationships research in the 1980s: towards an understanding of complex human sociality'. Western Journal of Speech Communication (44),114-119.
15.
Duck, S.W. (1984). `A perspective on the repair of personal relationships: Repairs of what, when?' In S.W. Duck (ed.). Personal Relationships 5:Repairing Personal Relationships. Academic Press: New York.
16.
Duck, S.W. , Lock, A., McCall G., Fitzpatrick, M.A. & Coyne, J.C. (1984). `Social and personal relationships: a joint editorial'. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships (1), 1-14.
17.
Duck, S.W. & Miell, D.E. (1982). `Charting the development of relationships'. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Personal Relationships, Madison, WI, July.
18.
Duck, S.W. & Sants, H. (1983). `On the origin of the specious: Are personal relationships really interpersonal states?'Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology (1), 27-24 1.
19.
Dulany, D. (1968). `Awareness, rules and propositional control: a confrontation with S-R behaviour theory'. In T.R. Dixon & D.L. Horton (eds), Verbal Behaviour and General Behaviour Theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc.: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
20.
Hinde, R.A. (1979). Towards Understanding Relationships. Academic Press: New York.
21.
Hinde, R.A. (1981). `The bases of a science of personal relationships'. In S.W. Duck & R. Gilmour (eds), Personal Relationships 1: Studying Personal Relationships. Academic Press: New York.
22.
Howells, K. (1981). `Social relationships in violent offenders'. In S.W. Duck & R. Gilmour (eds). Personal Relationships 3: Personal Relationships in Disorder. Academic Press: New York.
23.
Johnson, M.P. (1982). `Social and cognitive features of the dissolution of commitment to relationships'. In S.W. Duck. (ed.). Personal Relationships 4: Dissolving Personal Relationships. Academic Press: New York.
24.
Kendler, H.H. & Kendler, R.S. (1975). `From discrimination learning to cognitive development: a neo-behaviouristic odyssey'. In W.K. Estes (ed.), Handbook of Learning and Cognitive Processes (Vol. 1.) Erlbaum: Hillside, NJ.
25.
Kondo, H. (1969). Albert Einstein and the Theory of Relativity. Franklin-Watts, Inc.New York.
26.
Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
27.
Kuhn, T.S. (1977). The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.
28.
Larson, R.W. (1982). `Family and friends as contrasting interaction systems in the lives of adolescents'. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Personal Relationships, Madison, WI, July.
29.
Olson, D.H. (1977). `Insiders' and outsiders' views of relationships: research studies'. In G. Levinger & H. Raush (eds.). Close Relationships. University of Massachusetts Press: Amherst.
30.
Oppenheimer, J.R. (1956). `Analogy in science'. American Psychologist (11), 127-135.
31.
Ome, M.R. (1962). `On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: with particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications'. American Psychologist (17), 776-783.
32.
Page, M.M. (1972). `Demand characteristics and the verbal operant conditioning experiment'. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (23), 304-308.
33.
Russell, B. (1919). Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy. George Allen & Unwin: London.
34.
Russell, B. (1959). Wisdom of the West. Doubleday & Co., Inc.: Garden City, NY.
35.
Rychlak, J.F. (1977). The Psychology of Rigorous Humanism. Wiley-Interscience: New York.
36.
Rychlak, J.F. (1979). Discovering Free Will and Personal Responsibility. Oxford University Press: New York.
37.
Rychlak, J.F. (1981a). Introduction to Personality and Psychotherapy: A Theory-Construction Approach (2nd ed.). Houghton Mifflin: Boston.
38.
Rychlak, J.F. (1981b). `Sigmund Freud's confrontation with the telic mind'. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences (17), 176-183.
39.
Rychlak, J.F. (1981c). A Philosophy of Science for Personality Theory (2nd ed.). Robert E. Krieger Publishing Co: Malabar, FL.
40.
Rychlak, J.F. (1981d). `Logical learning theory: propositions, corollaries, and research evidence'. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (40), 731-749.
41.
Rychlak, J.F. (1984). `Newtonianism and the professional responsibility of psychologists: Who speaks for humanity?`Professional Psychology Research and Practice (15), 82-95.
42.
Rychlak, J.F. (In press). `The nature and challenge of teleological psychological theory'. Annals of Theoretical Psychology: An International Publication.
43.
Spielberger, C.D. , Berger, A. & Howard, K. (1963). `Conditioning of verbal behaviour as a function of awareness, need for social approval, and motivation to receive reinforcement'. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology (67), 241-246.
44.
Zukav, G. (1979). The Dancing Wu Li Masters: An Overview of The New Physics. Bantam Books: New York.
