Desired friends represent aspirational relationships. But are they realistic? Two longitudinal studies were conducted, each with two waves of data within a single school year. Participants included 340 boys and 385 girls, ages 10–14, from Florida (U.S.) and Lithuania. Participants identified and rank-ordered classmates who were desired friends and existing friends. Peer nominations assessed status and attributes (i.e., academic achievement, attractiveness, athleticism, fun, popularity, unpopularity). Few (3.1–13.4%) desired friends became reciprocated friends. Desired friends had higher status and more favorable attributes than (a) those not nominated as desired friends and (b) those who desired them as friends. Youth had more in common with existing friends than desired friends. We conclude that desired friends represent unattainable ideals rather than realistic interpersonal goals.
AlmaatouqA.PentlandA.ShmueliE.ShaliziC. R. (2016). Are you your friends’ friend? Poor perception of friendship ties limits the ability to promote behavioral change. PLoS One, 11(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151588
2.
AronA.LewandowskiG. W.Jr.MashekD.AronE. N. (2013). The self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships. In SimpsonJ. A.CampbellL. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 90–115). Oxford University Press.
3.
AsendorpfJ. B.PenkeL.BackM. D. (2011). From dating to mating and relating: Predictors of initial and long-term outcomes of speed-dating in a community sample. European Journal of Personality, 25(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.768
BerscheidE.DionK.WalsterE.WalsterG. W. (1971). Physical attractiveness and dating choice: A test of the matching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7(2), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(71)90065-5
6.
BrassN. R.RyanA. M. (2021). Changes in behavioral correlates of social status during early adolescence: Does school context matter?Developmental Psychology, 57(7), 1136–1148. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000957
7.
BruchE. E.NewmanM. E. J. (2018). Aspirational pursuit of mates in online dating markets. Science Advances, 4(8), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aap9815
8.
BukowskiW. M.SippolaL. K.HozaB. (1999). Same and other: Interdependency between participation in same- and other-sex friendships. Journal of Adolescence, 28(4), 439–459. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021664923911
9.
ByrneD. E. (1971). The attraction paradigm. Academic Press.
10.
CillessenA. H. N.MarksP. E. L. (2011). Conceptualizing and measuring popularity. In CillessenA. H. N.SchwartzD.MayeuxL. (Eds.), Popularity in the peer system (pp. 25–56). Guilford.
11.
CummingG.FinchS. (2005). Inference by eye: Confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. American Psychologist, 60(2), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.60.2.170
12.
DijkstraJ. K.CillessenA. H. N.BorchC. (2013). Popularity and adolescent friendship networks: Selection and influence dynamics. Developmental Psychology, 49(7), 1242–1252. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030098
13.
DijkstraJ. K.CillessenA. H. N.LindenbergS.VeenstraR. (2010). Basking in reflected glory and its limits: Why adolescents hang out with popular peers. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(4), 942–958. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00671.x
14.
EastwickP. W.FinkelE. J. (2008). Sex differences in mate preferences revisited: Do people know what they initially desire in a romantic partner?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(2), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.245
15.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
FaurS.Leggett-JamesM. P.KaniušonytėG.ŽukauskienėR.LaursenB. (2024). Perceptions of relationship quality that predict friendship dissolution during childhood and adolescence: Social support matters more than negativity. Developmental Psychology, 60(3), 560–566. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001676
18.
FletcherG. J. O.SimpsonJ. A.ThomasG. (2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(3), 340–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200265007
19.
FletcherG. J. O.SimpsonJ. A.ThomasG.GilesL. (1999). Ideals in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.1.72
20.
FurmanW.BiermanK. L. (1983). Developmental changes in young children's conceptions of friendship. Child Development, 54(3), 549–556. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130041
21.
GottmanJ. M.GrazianoW. G. (1983). How children become friends. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 48(3), 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/1165860
22.
HafenC. A.LaursenB.BurkW. J.KerrM.StattinH. (2011). Homophily in stable and unstable adolescent friendships: Similarity breeds constancy. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(5), 607–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.027
23.
HallJ. A. (2012). Friendship standards: The dimensions of ideal expectations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29(7), 884–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512448274
24.
HallJ. A.LarsonK. A.WattsA. (2011). Satisfying friendship maintenance expectations: The role of friendship standards and biological sex. Human Communication Research, 37(4), 529–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01411.x
25.
HartlA. C.LaursenB.CantinS.VitaroF. (2020). A test of the bistrategic control hypothesis of adolescent popularity. Child Development, 91(3), e635–e648. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13269
26.
HartlA. C.LaursenB.CillessenA. H. (2015). A survival analysis of adolescent friendships: The downside of dissimilarity. Psychological Science, 26(8), 1304–1315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615588751
27.
HenrichJ.Gil-WhiteF. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(3), 165–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00071-4
28.
IBM Corp. (2019). IBM SPSS statistics for windows (Version 25.0).
29.
KendrickK.JutengrenG.StattinH. (2012). The protective role of supportive friends against bullying perpetration and victimization. Journal of Adolescence, 35(4), 1069–1080. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.02.014
30.
KittsJ. A.LealD. F. (2021). What is(n’t) a friend? Dimensions of the friendship concept among adolescents. Social Networks, 66, 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2021.01.004
31.
LaursenB. (2017). Making and keeping friends: The importance of being similar. Child Development Perspectives, 11(4), 282–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12246
32.
LaursenB.AltmanR. L.BukowskiW. M.WeiL. (2020). Being fun: An overlooked indicator of childhood social status. Journal of Personality, 88(5), 993–1006. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12546
33.
LaursenB.VeenstraR. (2023). In defense of peer influence: The unheralded benefits of conformity. Child Development Perspectives, 17(1), 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12477
34.
LaursenB.WilliamsV. A. (1997). Perceptions of interdependence and closeness in family and peer relationships among adolescents with and without romantic partners. New Directions for Child Development, 1997(78), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219977803
35.
Leclerc BedardL. A.Leggett-JamesM. P.ŽukauskienėR.KaniušonytėG.LaursenB. (2025). The correlates and consequences of friendship change and friendlessness during late childhood and early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 46(4), 582–599. https://doi.org/10.1177/02724316251343104
36.
Leggett-JamesM. P.FaurS.KaniušonytėG.ŽukauskienėR.LaursenB. (2023). The perils of not being attractive or athletic: Pathways to adolescent adjustment difficulties through escalating unpopularity. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 52(11), 2231–2242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01835-1
37.
MilnerM.Jr. (2004). Freaks, geeks, and cool kids: Adolescents in the era of consumer culture. Routledge.
38.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998-2017). Mplus User’s Guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
39.
R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 4.3.1). R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
40.
ReganP. C.LevinL.GateR.SprecherS.ChristopherF. S. (2000). Partner preferences: What characteristics do men and women desire in their short-term sexual and long-term romantic partners?Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 12(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v12n03_01
41.
ReitzA. K.Motti-StefanidiF.AsendorpfJ. B. (2016). Me, us, and them: Testing sociometer theory in a socially diverse real-life context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(6), 908–920. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000073
42.
RubinK. H.WojslawowiczJ. C.Rose-KrasnorL.Booth-LaForceC.BurgessK. B. (2006). The best friendships of shy/withdrawn children: Prevalence, stability, and relationship quality. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-005-9017-4
SchenkerN.GentlemanJ. F. (2001). On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals. The American Statistician, 55(3), 182–186. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313001317097960
45.
ScholteR. H. J.OverbeekG.ten BrinkG.RommesE.de KempR. A. T.GoossensL.EngelsR. C. M. E. (2009). The significance of reciprocal and unilateral friendships for peer victimization in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(1), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-008-9287-6
46.
SeloverM.Leggett-JamesM. P.KaniušonytėG.LaursenB. (2026). School structure explains age group differences in friend selection similarity. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 50(2), 284–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/01650254251314822
47.
SimpsonJ. A.FletcherG. J. O.CampbellL. (2001). The structure and function of ideal standards in close relationships. In FletcherG. J. O.ClarkM. S. (Eds.), Interpersonal processes (pp. 86–106). Blackwell.
48.
ThomasA. G.JonasonP. K.BlackburnJ. D.KennairL. E. O.LoweR.MalouffJ.Stewart-WilliamsS.SulikowskiD.LiN. P. (2020). Mate preference priorities in the East and West: A cross-cultural test of the mate preference priority model. Journal of Personality, 88(3), 606–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12514
49.
ThomasK. J.BowkerJ. C. (2013). An investigation of desired friendships during early adolescence. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 33(6), 867–890. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431612469725
VitaroF.BoivinM.BukowskiW. M. (2009). The role of friendship in child and adolescent psychosocial development. In RubinK. H.BukowskiW. M.LaursenB. (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 568–585). Guilford.
52.
WagnerL. (2019). Good character is what we look for in a friend: Character strengths are positively related to peer acceptance and friendship quality in early adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 39(6), 864–903. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431618791286
