Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The present study explored the role of phubbing, or interrupting a conversation by attending to one’s cell phone instead of their communication partner, among 51 couples living together during the COVID-19 pandemic. Framed by affection exchange theory, the present study examined whether phubbing was indirectly associated with relationship satisfaction via feelings of affection deprivation. The findings indicated that phubbing was associated with greater feelings of affection deprivation, which in turn were associated with less relationship satisfaction. However, phubbing similarity (i.e., the extent to which partners engaged in similar phubbing behaviors) was not associated with affection deprivation or relationship satisfaction. Dyadic analyses revealed a partner effect between affection deprivation and relationship satisfaction. The theoretical implications for co-present phone use and its impact on relational dynamics are discussed.

Keywords

phubbing affection deprivation relationship satisfaction affection exchange theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Beukeboom

C. J.

Pollmann

(2021). Partner phubbing: Why using your phone during interactions with your partner can be detrimental for your relationship. Computers in Human Behavior, 124(1), Article 106932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106932

Bröning

Wartberg

(2022). Attached to your smartphone? A dyadic perspective on perceived partner phubbing and attachment in long-term couple relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 126(3), Article 106996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106996

Cascalheira

C. J.

McCormack

Wignall

(2024). Relationships, technology and the role of living arrangements during social lockdown related to COVID-19. Families, Relationships and Societies, 13(3), 407–425. https://doi.org/10.1332/204674321X16805990108608

Cornelius

Denes

Webber

K. T.

Guest

Goldsmith

Schwartz

J. E.

Gorin

A. A.

(2022). Relationship quality and objectively measured physical activity before and after implementation of COVID-19 stay-home orders. Journal of Health Psychology, 37(8), 1013–1021. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053211042075

David

M. E.

Roberts

J. A.

(2021). Investigating the impact of partner phubbing on romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction: The moderating role of attachment anxiety. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(12), 3590–3609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407521996454

Denes

Bennett

Winkler

K. L.

(2017). Exploring the benefits of affectionate communication: Implications for interpersonal acceptance–rejection theory. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 9(4), 491–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12218

Denes

Cornelius

Guest

Webber

K. T.

Gorin

A. A.

(2022). Sexuality and mental health during the pandemic: Associations among couples’ COVID-19 anxiety, sexual communication, and sexual satisfaction. Communication Research Reports, 39(5), 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2022.2120862

Denes

Cornelius

Webber

K. T.

Guest

Ellis

J. A.

Gorin

A. A.

(2023). Living through the pandemic together: Exploring the associations among couples’ communal orientation, self-disclosure, and thriving. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(11), 3563–3584. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075231175694

Denes

Crowley

J. P.

Winkler

K. L.

Ponivas

A. L. P.

Dhillon

Bennett

(2020). Exploring the effect of pillow talk on relationship satisfaction and physiological stress responses to couples’ difficult conversations. Communication Monographs, 87(3), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2020.1726424

10.

Floyd

(2006). Communicating affection: Interpersonal behavior and social context. Cambridge University Press.

11.

Floyd

(2014). Relational and health correlates of affection deprivation. Western Journal of Communication, 78(4), 383–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2014.927071

12.

Floyd

(2016). Affection deprivation is associated with physical pain and poor sleep quality. Communication Studies, 67(4), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2016.1205641

13.

Floyd

(2019). Affectionate communication in close relationships. Cambridge University Press.

14.

Floyd

Boren

J. P.

Hannawa

A. F.

Hesse

McEwan

Veksler

A. E.

(2009). Kissing in marital and cohabiting relationships: Effects on blood lipids, stress, and relationship satisfaction. Western Journal of Communication, 73(2), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570310902856071

15.

Floyd

Hesse

(2017). Affection deprivation is conceptually and empirically distinct from loneliness. Western Journal of Communication, 81(4), 446–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2016.1263757

16.

Halpern

Katz

J. E.

(2017). Texting’s consequences for romantic relationships: A cross-lagged analysis highlights its risks. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 386–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.051

17.

Hendrick

S. S.

(1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50(1), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.2307/352430

18.

Hesse

Floyd

Mikkelson

A. C.

(2023). Affection deprivation is more aversive than excessive affection: A test of affection exchange theory. Personal Relationships, 30(1), 296–313. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12458

19.

Hesse

Floyd

Rains

S. A.

Mikkelson

A. C.

Pauley

P. M.

Woo

N. T.

Custer

B. E.

Duncan

K. L.

(2021). Affectionate communication and health: A meta-analysis. Communication Monographs, 88(2), 194–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2020.1805480

20.

Hesse

Mikkelson

Tian

(2021). Affection deprivation during the COVID-19 pandemic: A panel study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(10), 2965–2984. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211046587

21.

Hesse

Mikkelson

A. C.

(2017). Affection deprivation in romantic relationships. Communication Quarterly, 65(1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2016.1176942

22.

Hesse

Tian

(2020). Affection deprivation in marital relationships: An actor-partner interdependence mediation analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37(3), 965–985. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407519883697

23.

Hipp

C. J.

Carlson

R. G.

(2021). The dyadic association among technoference and relationship and sexual satisfaction of young adult couples. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 47(5), 508–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2021.1922562

24.

Katsumata

Ichikohji

Nakano

Yamaguchi

Ikuine

(2022). Changes in the use of mobile devices during the crisis: Immediate response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 5(3), Article 100168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2022.100168

25.

Kenny

D. A.

Kashy

D. A.

Cook

W. L.

(2020). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Publications.

26.

McDaniel

B. T.

Drouin

(2019). Daily technology interruptions and emotional and relational well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.027

27.

Ohadi

Brown

Trub

Rosenthal

(2018). I just text to say I love you: Partner similarity in texting and relationship satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 78(8), 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.048

28.

Roberts

J. A.

David

M. E.

(2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54(1), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.058

29.

Schokkenbroek

J. M.

Hardyns

Ponnet

(2022). Phubbed and curious: The relation between partner phubbing and electronic partner surveillance. Computers in Human Behavior, 137(5), Article 107425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107425

30.

Stevic

Koban

Binder

Matthes

(2021). You are not alone: Smartphone use, friendship satisfaction, and anxiety during the COVID-19 crisis. Mobile Media & Communication, 10(2), 294–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/20501579211051820

31.

Togar

E. M.

Vanden Abeele

M. M. P.

van Wijk

C. H.

Yasin

R. M.

Antheunis

M. L.

(2023). An actor-partner model of partner phubbing, mobile phone conflict, and relationship satisfaction between romantic partners in Liberia. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(10), 3147–3170. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075231169701

32.

Turner

M. M.

Denes

Cornelius

(2025). The dyadic role of attachment in the relational maintenance of cohabitating couples during COVID-19. Communication Quarterly. Advanced Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2025.2491514

33.

Vanden Abeele

M. M. P.

Antheunis

M. L.

Schouten

A. P.

(2016). The effect of mobile messaging during a conversation on impression formation and interaction quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 562–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.005

34.

Vanden Abeele

M. M. P.

Hendrickson

A. T.

Pollmann

M. M. H.

Ling

(2019). Phubbing behavior in conversations and its relation to perceived conversation intimacy and distraction: An exploratory observation study. Computers in Human Behavior, 100, 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.004

35.

Vogels

E. A.

Anderson

(2020). Dating and relationships in the digital age. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2020/05/08/dating-and-relationships-in-the-digital-age/

36.

Wright

M. F.

Wachs

(2021). Moderation of technology use in the association between self-isolation during COVID-19 pandemic and adolescents’ romantic relationship quality. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 24(7), 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0729

37.

Zoppolat

Righetti

Balzarini

R. N.

Alonso-Ferres

Urganci

Rodrigues

D. L.

Debrot

Wiwattanapantuwong

Dharma

Chi

Karremans

J. C.

Schoebi

Slatcher

R. B.

(2022). Relationship difficulties and “technoference” during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 39(11), 3204–3227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407522109361

Phone or affection?: Assessing dyadic perceptions of partner phubbing,affection deprivation,and relationship satisfaction

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References