Family scholarship has documented negative associations between ambivalence and well-being in the context of parent-adult child relationships. As sibling ties remain salient throughout later life, ambivalence experienced in sibling relationships might also be related to older adult well-being. The purpose of this study was to examine the associations between sibling ambivalence and both psychological and physical well-being of older adults, as well as differences in these links by sibling gender composition. Data came from 702 older adults (392 women) who were 64.58 years old on average (SD = 4.51). Structural equation modeling using FIML revealed that participants who felt more ambivalence toward their siblings reported poorer psychological well-being. However, a multiple group analysis showed that this association was only significant for brother-brother pairs. Findings suggest the need to further investigate the implication of sibling ambivalence for psychological well-being in later life, especially for brothers.
AntonucciT.AkiyamaH.TakahashiK. (2004). Attachment and close relationships across the life span. Attachment & Human Development, 6(4), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461673042000303136
2.
BankS. P.KahnM. D. (1982). The sibling bond. Basic Books.
BedfordV. H.AvioliP. S. (2012). Siblings in middle and late adulthood. In BliesznerR.BedfordV. H. (Eds.), Handbook of families and aging (2nd ed., pp. 125–153). Praeger.
Blanchard-FieldsF.SteinR.WatsonT. L. (2004). Age differences in emotion-regulation strategies in handling everyday problems. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 59(6), 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/59.6.P261
Campione‐BarrN.KillorenS. E. (2019). Love them and hate them: The developmental appropriateness of ambivalence in the adolescent sibling relationship. Child Development Perspectives, 13(4), 221–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12345
9.
CicirelliV. G. (1989). Feelings of attachment to siblings and well-being in later life. Psychology and Aging, 4(2), 211–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.4.2.211
10.
CongerR. D.CongerK. J. (2002). Resilience in Midwestern families: Selected findings from the first decade of a prospective, longitudinal study. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(2), 361–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00361.x
ConnidisI. A.CampbellL. D. (1995). Closeness, confiding, and contact among siblings in middle and late adulthood. Journal of Family Issues, 16(6), 722–745. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251395016006003
14.
ConnidisI. A.McMullinJ. A. (2002). Sociological ambivalence and family ties: A critical perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(3), 558–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00558.x
15.
DerogatisL. R. (1994). Symptom checklist-90-R: Administration, scoring & procedure manual for the revised version of the SCL-90. National Computer Systems.
DunnJ. (1996). Children’s family relationships between two and five: Developmental changes and individual differences. Social Development, 5(3), 230–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.1996.tb00083.x
18.
EisingaR.GrotenhuisM. T.PelzerB. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?International Journal of Public Health, 58(4), 637–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3
19.
EriksenS.GerstelN. (2002). A labor of love or labor itself: Care work among adult brothers and sisters. Journal of Family Issues, 23(7), 836–856. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251302236597
20.
FingermanK. L.HayE. L. (2002). Searching under the streetlight? Age biases in the personal and family relationships literature. Personal Relationships, 9(4), 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.09404
21.
FingermanK. L.HayE. L.BirdittK. S. (2004). The best of ties, the worst of Ties: Close, problematic, and ambivalent social relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66(3), 792–808. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00053.x
22.
FingermanK. L.PitzerL.LefkowitzE. S.BirdittK. S.MroczekD. (2008). Ambivalent relationship qualities between adults and their parents: Implications for the well-being of both parties. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 63(6), 362–371. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/63.6.P362
23.
FullerH. R.AjrouchK. J.AntonucciT. C. (2020). The convoy model and later‐life family relationships. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 12(2), 126–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12376
24.
GilliganM.KarrakerA.JasperA. (2018). Linked lives and cumulative inequality: A multigenerational family life course framework. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 10(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12244
25.
GilliganM.StockerC. M.Jewsbury CongerK. (2020). Sibling relationships in adulthood: Research findings and new frontiers. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 12(3), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12385
26.
GilliganM.SuitorJ. J.FeldS.PillemerK. (2015). Do positive feelings hurt? Disaggregating positive and negative components of intergenerational ambivalence. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(1), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12146
27.
GilliganM.SuitorJ. J.KimS.PillemerK. (2013). Differential effects of perceptions of mothers’ and fathers’ favoritism on sibling tension in adulthood. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 68(4), 593–598. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt039
28.
GilliganM.SuitorJ. J.NamS. (2015). Maternal differential treatment in later life families and within-family variations in adult sibling closeness. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 70(1), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbu148
29.
GilliganM.SuitorJ. J.NamS.RouthB.RurkaM.ConG. (2017). Family networks and psychological well-being in midlife. Social Sciences, 6(3), 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci6030094
30.
GirardinM.WidmerE. D.ConnidisI. A.CastrénA. M.GouveiaR.MasottiB. (2018). Ambivalence in later‐life family networks: Beyond intergenerational dyads. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80(3), 768–784. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12469
31.
GrahamJ. W.CoffmanD. L. (2012). Structural equation modeling with missing data. In HoyleR. H. (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 277–295). The Guilford Press.
32.
Holt-LunstadJ.UchinoB. N. (2019). Social ambivalence and disease (SAD): A theoretical model aimed at understanding the health implications of ambivalent relationships. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(6), 941–966. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619861392
33.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
34.
Ingersoll‐DaytonB.NealM. B.HaJ. H.HammerL. B. (2003). Redressing inequity in parent care among siblings. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(1), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00201.x
35.
JensenA. C.ApsleyH. B.ThackerayL. E.ShoafB. T. (2022). Sibling social comparison in Mid-to later life: Links with well-being and relationship quality. Journal of Family Issues, 43(9), 2355–2379. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X211030726
36.
JensenA. C.NielsonM. K.YorgasonJ. B. (2020). The longest-lasting relationship: Patterns of contact and well-being among mid-to later-life siblings. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 75(10), 2240–2249. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbz083
37.
JensenA. C.WhitemanS. D.FingermanK. L. (2018). “Can’t live with or without them:” Transitions and young adults’ perceptions of sibling relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 32(3), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000361
38.
KiecoltK. J.BliesznerR.SavlaJ. (2011). Long-term influences of intergenerational ambivalence on midlife parents’ psychological well‐being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 73(2), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00812.x
39.
KnightB. G. (2023). Therapy with older adult couples. In LebowJ. L.SnyderD. K. (Eds.), Clinical handbook of couple therapy (pp. 454–471). Guilford Publications.
40.
LeeJ.LeeJ. (2018). Psychometrics of a Korean intergenerational psychological ambivalence scale for young adult children. Journal of Family Relations, 23(3), 105–130. https://doi.org/10.21321/jfr.23.3.105
41.
LeeJ.LeeJ. (2019). Intergenerational ambivalence among young adults in Korea: Associations with dimensions of intergenerational solidarity. Journal of Korean Home Management Association, 37(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.7466/JKHMA.2019.37.1.1
42.
LendonJ. P.SilversteinM.GiarrussoR. (2014). Ambivalence in older parent–adult child relationships: Mixed feelings, mixed measures. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(2), 272–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12101
43.
LowensteinA. (2007). Solidarity-conflict and ambivalence: Testing two conceptual frameworks and their impact on quality of life for older family members. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 62(2), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/62.2.S100
44.
LüscherK. (2011). Ambivalence: A “sensitizing construct” for the study and practice of intergenerational relationships. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 9(2), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2011.568338
45.
LüscherK.PillemerK. (1998). Intergenerational ambivalence: A new approach to the study of parent-child relations in later life. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60(2), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.2307/353858
46.
MatthewsS. H. (2002). Sisters and brothers/daughters and sons: Meeting the needs of old parents. Unlimited Publishing LLC.
PaulE. (1997). A longitudinal analysis of midlife interpersonal relationships and well-being. In LachmanM. E.JamesJ. B. (Eds.), Multiple paths of midlife development (pp. 171–206). University of Chicago Press.
49.
PillemerK. (2004). Can’t live with ‘Em, can’t live without ‘Em: Older mothers’ ambivalence toward their adult children. In PillemerK.LuscherK. (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in family research: Volume 4. Intergenerational ambivalences: New perspectives on parent-child relations in later life (pp. 115–132). Elsevier.
RaulinM. L. (1984). Development of a scale to measure intense ambivalence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.52.1.63
52.
ReczekR.StaceyL.DunstonC. (2022). Friend, foe, or forget ‘Em? The quality of LGBTQ adult sibling relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 84(2), 415–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12821
53.
RojasS. M.GrzywaczJ. G.Zapata RoblyerM. I.CrainR.CervantesR. C. (2016). Stressors among Hispanic adults from immigrant families in the United States: Familismo as a context for ambivalence. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 22(3), 408–416. https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000082
54.
ScharfM.ShulmanS.Avigad-SpitzL. (2005). Sibling relationships in emerging adulthood and in adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Research, 20(1), 64–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558404271133
55.
ShermanA. M.LansfordJ. E.VollingB. L. (2006). Sibling relationships and best friendships in young adulthood: Warmth, conflict, and well‐being. Personal Relationships, 13(2), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00110.x
56.
SteinbachA.HankK. (2018). Full-half-and step-sibling relations in young and middle adulthood. Journal of Family Issues, 39(9), 2639–2658. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X18757829
57.
StockerC. M.GilliganM.KlopackE. T.CongerK. J.LanthierR. P.NepplT. K.O’NealC. W.WickramaK. A. S. (2020). Sibling relationships in older adulthood: Links with loneliness and well-being. Journal of Family Psychology, 34(2), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000586
58.
SuitorJ. J.GilliganM.PillemerK. (2011). Conceptualizing and measuring intergenerational ambivalence in later life. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 66(6), 769–781. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbr108
59.
SýkorováD. (2024). Siblinghood amongst older adults: What being a sibling or having siblings means. Journal of Family Issues, 45(2), 419–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X221150974
60.
ThompsonM. M.ZannaM. P.GriffinD. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 361–386). Erlbaum.
61.
UchinoB. N.BoschJ. A.SmithT. W.CarlisleM.BirminghamW.BowenK. S.LightK. C.HeaneyJ.O'HartaighB. (2013). Relationships and cardiovascular risk: Perceived spousal ambivalence in specific relationship contexts and its links to inflammation. Health Psychology, 32(10), 1067–1075. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033515
62.
UchinoB. N.Holt-LunstadJ.SmithT. W.BloorL. (2004). Heterogeneity in social networks: A comparison of different models linking relationships to psychological outcomes. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23(2), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.23.2.123.31014
63.
UchinoB. N.SmithT. W.BergC. A. (2014). Spousal relationship quality and cardiovascular risk: Dyadic perceptions of relationship ambivalence are associated with coronary-artery calcification. Psychological Science, 25(4), 1037–1042. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613520015
64.
WalkerA. J.AllenK. R.ConnidisI. A. (2005). Theorizing and studying sibling ties in adulthood. In BengtsonV. L.AcockA. C.AllenK. R.Dilworth-AndersonP.KleinD. M. (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory and research (pp. 167–190). Sage.
WhitemanS. D.SolmeyerA. R.McHaleS. M. (2015). Sibling relationships and adolescent adjustment: Longitudinal associations in two-parent African American families. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(11), 2042–2053. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0286-0
69.
ZygowiczS. D. (2006). Interpersonal complementarity and intergenerational ambivalence: Parent adult child relationships(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Arizona State University.
