Young adults engage in digital dating abuse (DDA), or threatening, monitoring, and controlling behavior towards a romantic partner through technology. Alcohol use and jealousy are well-established risk factors for in-person partner abuse but have not yet been investigated in couples in the context of DDA. Jealousy might be a relevant moderator in the digital context, potentially amplifying the negative associations between problematic alcohol use and DDA. Thus, we examine dyadic associations between young adults’ problematic alcohol use and DDA perpetration, with romantic jealousy as a moderator. Participants are young adult heterosexual couples (N = 91 couples, Mage = 21.03 years, 54.4% White, 19.2% Latino, 26.3% other). Results from actor-partner interdependence models suggest that men’s jealousy significantly moderates both the actor effect for men and the partner effect for women. In contrast, women’s jealousy significantly moderates the partner effects for both men and women. Men’s problematic alcohol use is a risk factor for their own DDA perpetration at high levels of jealousy and is a risk factor for their partner’s DDA perpetration across their own or their partner’s jealousy. Women’s problematic alcohol use is a risk factor for their partner’s DDA perpetration across levels of their jealousy. These findings underscore the importance of considering individual and relational factors in understanding DDA. The study highlights the need for dyadic interventions targeting problematic alcohol use and jealousy to prevent DDA. Future research should utilize longitudinal designs and diary studies to investigate in-the-moment processes and within-person variability.
ArnettJ. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties (pp. viii–270). Oxford University Press.
2.
BaborT. F.de la FuenteSaundersJ.GrantM. (1992). AUDIT. The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Guidelines for use in primary health care. World Health Organization.
3.
BareldsD. P. H.Barelds-DijkstraP. (2007). Relations between different types of jealousy and self and partner perceptions of relationship quality. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 14(3), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.532
4.
BartholomewK.CobbR. J. (2010). Conceptualizing relationship violence as a dyadic process. In Handbook of interpersonal Psychology (pp. 233–248). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118001868.ch14
5.
BlowA. J.GormanL.GanoczyD.KeesM.KashyD. A.ValensteinM.MarcusS. M.FitzgeraldH. E.ChermackS. (2013). Hazardous drinking and family functioning in National Guard veterans and spouses postdeployment. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(2), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031881
6.
BremM. J.RomeroG.GarnerA. R.GrigorianH.StuartG. L. (2021). Alcohol problems, jealousy, and cyber dating abuse perpetration among men and women: Toward a conceptual model. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(19–20), 0886260519876029. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519876029
7.
BremM. J.ShoreyR. C.McNultyJ.ElledgeL. C.TempleJ. R.StuartG. L. (2022). Proximal associations among college students’ alcohol use and cyber partner abuse perpetration. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 36(7), 815–823. https://doi.org/10.1037/ADB0000818
8.
BremM. J.ShoreyR. C.RothmanE. F.TempleJ. R.StuartG. L. (2018). Trait jealousy moderates the relationship between alcohol problems and intimate partner violence among men in batterer intervention programs. Violence Against Women, 24(10), 1132–1148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218781948
9.
BuunkB. P. (1997). Personality, birth order and attachment styles as related to various types of jealousy. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(6), 997–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(97)00136-0
10.
Cano-GonzalezI.CharakR.ChenP.-Y.CantosA. (2022). Patterns, risk factors, and mental health correlates of cyber intimate partner violence in Hispanic emerging adults. Journal of Family Violence, 38(5), 941–952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-022-00434-1
11.
CapaldiD. M.KimH. K.ShorttJ. W. (2004). Women’s involvement in aggression in young adult romantic relationships: A developmental systems model. In Aggression, antisocial behavior, and violence among girls: A developmental perspective (pp. 223–241). Guilford Publications.
12.
CapaldiD. M.KnobleN. B.ShorttJ. W.KimH. K. (2012). A systematic review of risk factors for intimate partner violence. Partner Abuse, 3(2), 231–280. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.3.2.231
13.
CapaldiD. M.LowS.TiberioS. S.ShorttJ. W. (2019). Intimate partner violence across the lifespan: Dyadic theory and risk and protective factors. In Handbook of interpersonal violence and abuse across the lifespan (pp. 1–25). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62122-7_151-1
14.
CaridadeS.BragaT.BorrajoE. (2019). Cyber dating abuse (CDA): Evidence from a systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 48, 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2019.08.018
15.
CookW. L.KennyD. A. (2005). The actor-partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250444000405
16.
CraneC. A.WiernikB. M.BerbaryC. M.CrawfordM.SchlauchR. C.EastonC. J. (2021). A meta-analytic review of the relationship between cyber aggression and substance use. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 221, Article 108510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108510
17.
CrooksC. V.JaffeP.DunlopC.KerryA.Exner-CortensD. (2019). Preventing gender-based violence among adolescents and young adults: Lessons from 25 years of program development and evaluation. Violence Against Women, 25(1), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218815778
18.
DokkedahlS.ElklitA. (2019). Understanding the mutual partner dynamic of intimate partner violence: A review. Partner Abuse, 10(3), 298–335. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.10.3.298
19.
EckhardtC. I.ParrottD. J.CraneC. A. (2019). Alcohol, conflict, and aggression in intimate relationships: A dyadic approach. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(5), 1459–1475. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518825308
20.
EllysonA. M.AdhiaA.LyonsV. H.RivaraF. P. (2021). Prevalence, age of initiation, and patterns of co-occurrence of digital dating abuse behaviors nationwide. Children and Youth Services Review, 122, Article 105921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105921
21.
FinkelE. J.EckhardtC. I. (2013). Intimate partner violence. In SimpsonJ. A.CampbellL. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 452–474). New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
ForanH. M.HeymanR. E.Smith SlepSnarrJ. D.United States Air Force Family Advocacy Research Program. (2012). Hazardous alcohol use and intimate partner violence in the military: understanding protective factors. Psychology of addictive behaviors: Journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 26(3), 471–483. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027688
23.
ForanH. M.O’LearyK. D. (2008). Problem drinking, jealousy, and anger control: Variables predicting physical aggression against a partner. Journal of Family Violence, 23(3), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10896-007-9136-5
24.
García CarreteroM. Á.Novalbos RuizJ. P.Martínez DelgadoJ. M.O’Ferrall GonzálezC. (2016). Validation of the alcohol use disorders identification test in university students: AUDIT and AUDIT-C. Adicciones, 28(4), 194–204. https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.775
25.
GilbarO.CharakR.TrujilloO.CantuJ. I.CavazosV.LaviI. (2023). Meta-analysis of cyber intimate partner violence perpetration and victimization: Different types and their associations with face-to-face IPV among men and women. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(3), 1948–1965. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221082087
26.
HorigianV. E.SchmidtR. D.FeasterD. J. (2021). Loneliness, mental health, and substance use among US young adults during COVID-19. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 53(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2020.1836435
27.
JohnsonW. L.GiordanoP. C.ManningW. D.LongmoreM. A. (2015). The age-IPV curve: Changes in the perpetration of intimate partner violence during adolescence and young adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(3), 708–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10964-014-0158-Z
28.
JohnsonFayL. C. (1950). The Johnson-Neyman technique, its theory and application. Psychometrika, 15(4), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288864
29.
KokotailoP. K.EganJ.GangnonR.BrownD.MundtM.FlemingM. (2004). Validity of the alcohol use disorders identification test in college students. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 28(6), 914–920. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ALC.0000128239.87611.F5
30.
KwokI.WescottA. B. (2020). Cyberintimacy: A scoping review of technology-mediated romance in the digital age. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(10), 657–666. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0764
31.
LeadbeaterB. J.BanisterE. M.EllisW. E.YeungR. (2008). Victimization and relational aggression in adolescent romantic relationships: The influence of parental and peer pehaviors, and individual adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(3), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-007-9269-0
32.
LeoneR. M.CraneC. A.ParrottD. J.EckhardtC. I. (2016). Problematic drinking, impulsivity, and physical IPV perpetration: A dyadic analysis. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 30(3), 356–366. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000159
33.
LiJ.RanG.ZhangQ.HeX. (2023). The prevalence of cyber dating abuse among adolescents and emerging adults: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 144, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2023.107726
34.
LowS.TiberioS. S.ShorttJ. W.CapaldiD. M.EddyJ. M. (2017). Associations of couples’ intimate partner violence in young adulthood and substance use: A dyadic approach. Psychology of Violence, 7(1), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/VIO0000038
35.
LuY.Van OuytselJ.TempleJ. R. (2021). In-person and cyber dating abuse: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(12), 3713–3731. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211065202
36.
McCollumE. E.StithS. M.MillerM. S.RatcliffeG. C. (2011). Including a brief substance-abuse motivational intervention in a couples treatment program for intimate partner violence. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 22(3), 216–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/08975353.2011.602618
37.
MelanderL.HughesV. (2018). College partner violence in the digital age: Explaining cyber aggression using routine activities theory. Partner Abuse, 9(2), 158–180. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.9.2.158
38.
NacarG.Timur TaşhanS.BekarM. (2021). Adaptation of the cyber aggression in relationships scale to Turkish: A validity and reliability study. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 57(1), 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12556
39.
O’HairC. M.GrocottL. R.McNultyJ. K.StuartG. L.ShoreyR. C. (2023). Alcohol use, trait anger, and intimate partner aggression perpetration in college student couples. Journal of Family Violence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-023-00631-6
40.
PatrickM. E.MiechR. A.JohnstonL. D.O’MalleyP. M. (2023). Monitoring the future panel study annual report: National data on substance use among adults ages 19 to 60, 1976-2022 (monitoring the future monograph series). Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
PreacherK. J.CurranP. J.BauerD. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(4), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986031004437
43.
ReedL. A.LawlerS. M.CosgroveJ. M. C.TolmanR. M.WardL. M. (2021). “It was a joke:” Patterns in girls’ and boys’ self-reported motivations for digital dating abuse behaviors. Children and Youth Services Review, 122, Article 105883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105883
44.
ReedL. A.TolmanR. M.WardL. M. (2017). Gender matters: Experiences and consequences of digital dating abuse victimization in adolescent dating relationships. Journal of Adolescence, 59(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.05.015
45.
RodriguezL. M.DiBelloA. M.NeighborsC. (2015). Positive and negative jealousy in the association between problem drinking and IPV perpetration. Journal of Family Violence, 30(8), 987–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-015-9736-4
46.
Rodríguez-DomínguezC.Durán SeguraM.Martínez-PecinoR. (2018). Cyber aggressors in dating relationships and its relation with psychological violence, sexism and jealousy. Health and Addictions, 18(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.21134/haaj.v18i1.329
47.
ShoreyR. C.BrasfieldH.ZaporH.FebresJ.StuartG. L. (2015). The relation between alcohol use and psychological, physical, and sexual dating violence perpetration among male college students. Violence Against Women, 21(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801214564689
48.
StonardK. E. (2020). “Technology was designed for this”: Adolescents’ perceptions of the role and impact of the use of technology in cyber dating violence. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, Article 106211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106211
49.
WatkinsL. E.MaldonadoR. C.DiLilloD. (2014). Hazardous alcohol use and intimate partner aggression among dating couples: The role of impulse control difficulties. Aggressive Behavior, 40(4), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21528
50.
WatkinsL. E.MaldonadoR. C.DiLilloD. (2018). The cyber aggression in relationships scale: A new multidimensional measure of technology-based intimate partner aggression. Assessment, 25(5), 608–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116665696
51.
WincentakK.ConnollyJ.CardN. (2017). Teen dating violence: A meta-analytic review of prevalence rates. Psychology of Violence, 7(2), 224–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040194
52.
WoernerJ.FisselE. R.FloriJ. N.MemphisR. N. (2023). Problem drinking is associated with intimate partner cyber abuse perpetration but is buffered by high relationship satisfaction. Journal of Family Violence, 39(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-023-00513-x
53.
ZweigJ. M.DankM.LachmanP.YahnerJ. (2013). Technology, teen dating violence and abuse, and bullying. U.S. Department of Justice. https://www.urban.org.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
