Research on romantic conflict has persuasively documented that the way partners communicate with one another during disagreements is a driving factor in predicting how they perceive the conflicts in their relationships. The current research added to this literature by differentiating couples who resolve conflicts more, versus less, successfully. Specifically, the current work examined how couples’ behavioral trajectories across the course of conflict related to their perceptions of conflict resolution. To this end, we coded warmth and dominance behaviors exhibited by 173 couple members (346 individuals) over the course of an eight-minute conflict discussion. We examined how participants’, and their partners’, perceptions of conflict resolution were related to their interpersonal behaviors. In line with predictions, less average interpersonal warmth was associated with worse perceptions of resolution, and declining warmth over time was also associated with worse perceptions of resolution. Dominance behaviors were not associated with conflict resolution perceptions.
Alonso-FerresM.RighettiF.Valor-SeguraI.ExpositoF. (2021). How power affects emotional communication during relationship conflicts: The role of perceived partner responsiveness. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(7), 1203–1215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550621996496
2.
BayesM. A. (1972). Behavioral cues of interpersonal warmth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 39(2), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033367
3.
BordinE. S. (1955). Psychological counseling (p. 414). Appleton-Century-Crofts.
4.
CarrèreS.GottmanJ. M. (1999). Predicting divorce among newlyweds from the first three minutes of a marital conflict discussion. Family Process, 38(3), 293–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1999.00293.x
5.
CarsonR. (1969). Interaction Concepts of Personality. Aldine.
6.
CorneliusT. L.AlessiG. (2007). Behavioral and physiological components of communication training: Does the topic affect outcome?Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(3), 608–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00395.x
7.
CrenshawA. O.LeoK.ChristensenA.HoganJ. N.BaucomK. J. W.BaucomB. R. W. (2021). Relative importance of conflict topics for within-couple tests: The case of demand/withdraw interaction. Journal of Family Psychology: JFP: journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 35(3), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000782
8.
CundiffJ. M.SmithT. W.ButnerJ.CritchfieldK. L.Nealey-MooreJ. (2015). Affiliation and control in marital interaction: Interpersonal complementarity is present but is not associated with affect or relationship quality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214557002
9.
DunlopW. L.McCoyT. P.HanleyG. E.HarakeN. R. (2020). Communion. Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences, 765–772.
10.
FinkelE. J. (2009). Intimate partner violence. National Science Foundation. Grant #0719780.
11.
FinkelE. J.SlotterE. B.LuchiesL. B.WaltonG. M.GrossJ. J. (2013). A brief intervention to promote conflict reappraisal preserves marital quality over time. Psychological Science, 24(8), 1595–1601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612474938
12.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP. (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005
13.
FoxS. E.ThomasK. M.DurbinC. E.HopwoodC. J. (2021). A variance decomposition of the continuous assessment of interpersonal dynamics. Psychological Assessment, 33(5), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000995
FunderD. C. (1999). Personality judgment: A realistic approach to person perception. Elsevier.
16.
GiffordR. (1991). Mapping nonverbal behavior on the interpersonal circle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.279
17.
GiffordR. (1994). A lens-mapping framework for understanding the encoding and decoding of interpersonal dispositions in nonverbal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(2), 398–412. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.66.2.398
18.
GiffordR.O'ConnorB. (1987). The interpersonal circumplex as a behavior map. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(5), 1019–1026. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.5.1019
19.
GirardJ. M.C WrightA. G. (2018). DARMA: Software for dual axis rating and media annotation. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 902–909. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0915-5
20.
GottmanJ.MarkmanH.NotariusC. (1977). The topography of marital conflict: A sequential analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of Marriage and Family, 39(3), 461–477. https://doi.org/10.2307/350902
21.
GottmanJ. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes (pp. 521). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
22.
GottmanJ. M.CoanJ.CarrereS.SwansonC. (1998). Predicting marital happiness and stability from newlywed interactions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/353438
23.
GottmanJ. M.GottmanJ. S. (2015). Gottman couple therapy. In Clinical handbook of couple therapy (5th ed., pp. 129–157). The Guilford Press.
24.
GottmanJ. M.LevensonR. W. (2000). The timing of divorce: Predicting when a couple will divorce over a 14-year period. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(3), 737–745. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00737.x
25.
HannonP. A.RusbultC. E.FinkelE. J.KamashiroM. (2010). In the wake of betrayal: Amends, forgiveness, and the resolution of betrayal. Personal Relationships, 17(2), 253–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01275.x
26.
HopwoodC. J.HarrisonA. L.AmoleM.GirardJ. M.WrightA. G. C.ThomasK. M.SadlerP.AnsellE. B.ChaplinT. M.MoreyL. C.CrowleyM. J.Emily DurbinC.KashyD. A. (2020). Properties of the continuous assessment of interpersonal dynamics across sex, level of familiarity, and interpersonal conflict. Assessment, 27(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118798916
27.
HoyleR. H.LynamD. R.MillerJ. D.PekJ. (2023). The questionable practice of partialing to refine scores on and inferences about measures of psychological constructs. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 19(1), 155–176. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-071720-015436
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3
30.
KashyD. A.DonnellanM. B.BurtS. A.McGueM. (2008). Growth curve models for indistinguishable dyads using multilevel modeling and structural equation modeling: The case of adolescent twins' conflict with their mothers. Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 316–329. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.2.316
31.
KelleyH. H.ThibautJ. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. Wiley.
32.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis (pp. 458). Guilford Press.
33.
KieslerD. J. (1983). The 1982 interpersonal circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. Psychological Review, 90(3), 185–214. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.90.3.185
34.
KieslerD. J. (1996). Contemporary interpersonal theory and research: Personality, psychopathology, and psychotherapy (pp. 398). John Wiley & Sons.
35.
KooT. K.LiM. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
36.
KurziusE.BorkenauP.LeisingD. (2022). Spontaneous interpersonal complementarity in the lab: A multilevel approach to modeling the antecedents and consequences of people’s interpersonal behaviors and their dynamic interplay. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 122(2), 244–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000347
37.
LearyT. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality; a functional theory and methodology for personality evaluation (pp. 518). Ronald Press.
38.
MandalE.LipM. (2022). Mindfulness, relationship quality, and conflict resolution strategies used by partners in close relationships. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 10(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2021.111981
39.
ManusovV. L. (Ed.). (2014). Going beyond words. Psychology Press.
40.
MarkeyP. M.FunderD. C.OzerD. J. (2003). Complementarity of interpersonal behaviors in dyadic interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(9), 1082–1090. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203253474
41.
MarkeyP. M.MarkeyC. N. (2006). A spherical conceptualization of personality traits. European Journal of Personality, 20(3), 169–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.582
42.
McGrawK. O.WongS. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989x.1.1.30
43.
MeiselS. N.ColderC. R.HopwoodC. J. (2022). Assessing parent-adolescent substance use discussions using the continuous assessment of interpersonal dynamics. Journal of Personality Assessment, 104(6), 800–812. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2021.2019051
44.
OlivolaC. Y.FunkF.TodorovA. (2014). Social attributions from faces bias human choices. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(11), 566–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.09.007
45.
OstrovJ. M.CollinsW. A. (2007). Social dominance in romantic relationships: A prospective longitudinal study of non-verbal processes. Social Development, 16(3), 580–595. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2007.00397.x
46.
PetersenJ.LeB. (2017). Psychological distress, attachment, and conflict resolution in romantic relationships. Modern Psychological Studies, 23(1), 3.
47.
RossJ. M.GirardJ. M.WrightA. G. C.BeeneyJ. E.ScottL. N.HallquistM. N.LazarusS. A.SteppS. D.PilkonisP. A. (2017). Momentary patterns of covariation between specific affects and interpersonal behavior: Linking relationship science and personality assessment. Psychological Assessment, 29(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000338
48.
RusbultC. E.ArriagaX. B. (2000). Interdependence in personal relationships. In IckesW.DuckS. (Eds.), The social psychology of personal relationships (pp. 79–108). Wiley.
49.
RusbultC. E.MartzJ. M.AgnewC. R. (1998). The investment model scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5(4), 357–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x
50.
SadlerP.EthierN.GunnG.DuongD.WoodyE. (2009). Are we on the same wavelength? Interpersonal complementarity as shared cyclical patterns during interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1005–1020. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016232
51.
SadlerP.WoodyE. (2003). Is who you are who you’re talking to? Interpersonal style and complementarily in mixed-sex interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 80–96.
52.
SlotterE. B.MarkeyP. M.AudigierA.DashineauS. C.FinkelE. J.LuchiesL. B. (2023). Love’s a dance you learn as you go: Evidence for interpersonal complementarity during romantic conflict and its association with relationship outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 53(4), 805–822. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2937
53.
SmithT. W.CarlsonS. E.UchinoB. N.BaucomB. R. (2022). To put asunder: Are there perils of partialing in actor–partner interdependence models?Journal of Family Psychology: JFP: journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 36(8), 1462–1472. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001011
54.
SmithT. W.TraupmanE. K.UchinoB. N.BergC. A. (2010). Interpersonal circumplex descriptions of psychosocial risk factors for physical illness: Application to hostility, neuroticism, and marital adjustment. Journal of Personality, 78(3), 1011–1036. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00641.x
55.
TandlerN.KrügerM.PetersenL. E. (2020). Better battles by a self-compassionate partner? The mediating role of personal conflict resolution styles in the association between self-compassion and satisfaction in romantic relationships. Journal of Individual Differences, 42(2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000333
56.
TraceyT. J.RyanJ. M.Jaschik-HermanB. (2001). Complementarity of interpersonal circumplex traits. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(7), 786–797. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201277002
57.
WeberD. M.LavnerJ. A.BeachS. R. H. (2023). Couples’ communication quality differs by topic. Journal of Family Psychology: JFP: journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 37(6), 909–919. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001111
58.
WeigelD. J.ShroutM. R. (2021). Relationship conflict, appraisals, and disillusionment: The moderating role of depression. Personality and Individual Differences, 171(1), 110494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110494
59.
WigginsJ. S. (1995). Interpersonal adjective scales professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
60.
WrightA. G. C.PincusA. L.LenzenwegerM. F. (2012). Interpersonal development, stability, and change in early adulthood. Journal of Personality, 80(5), 1339–1372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00761.x
61.
Żemojtel-PiotrowskaM.PiotrowskiJ.ClintonA.CieciuchJ.Różycka-TranJ.KhanhH. T. T. (2015). Entitlement and subjective well-being: A three-nations study. Health Psychology Report, 3(2), 140–149. https://doi.org/10.5114/hpr.2015.49635
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
