This research provides a conceptual replication and theoretical extension of the mutual cyclical growth model. This model proposes that dependence promotes relationship commitment, which promotes pro-relationship behavior, which—when detected by partners—promotes partners’ trust, which promotes partners’ willingness to depend on the relationship. Prior research supports these links on a month-to-month basis, but romantic partners’ thoughts, feelings, and behaviors may change on a day-to-day basis. The present research sought to replicate the model on a daily level, and to extend the model with an important potential moderator: individuals’ attachment orientations. Results from a dyadic daily-report study of romantic couples replicated the links in the mutual cyclical growth model at the level of day-to-day fluctuations in partners’ experiences; the links were especially strong for individuals high in attachment anxiety. This research provides insight into mechanisms through which close relationships develop and strengthen.
AgnewC. R.Van LangeP. A. M.RusbultC. E.LangstonC. A. (1998). Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(4), 939–954. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.4.939
2.
AronA.AronE. N. (1997). Self-expansion motivation and including other in the self. In DuckS. (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions (2nd ed., pp. 251–270). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
3.
AxelrodR. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books.
4.
BartzJ. A.LydonJ. E. (2006). Navigating the interdependence dilemma: Attachment goals and the use of communal norms with potential close others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(1), 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.77
5.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497
6.
BeckL. A.ClarkM. S. (2010). Looking a gift horse in the mouth as a defense against increasing intimacy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(4), 676–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.02.006
7.
BeckL. A.PietromonacoP. R.DeVitoC. C.PowersS. I.BoyleA. M. (2014). Congruence between spouses’ perceptions and observers’ ratings of responsiveness: The role of attachment avoidance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(2), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213507779
8.
BolgerN.LaurenceauJ. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. Guilford Press.
9.
BolgerN.ZuckermanA.KesslerR. C. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 953–961. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.953
10.
BuiK. V. T.PeplauL. A.HillC. T. (1996). Testing the Rusbult model of relationship commitment and stability in a 15-year study of heterosexual couples. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(12), 1244–1257. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672962212005
11.
CampbellL.SimpsonJ. A.BoldryJ.KashyD. A. (2005). Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: The role of attachment anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 510–531. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.510
12.
ClarkM. S.MillsJ. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.12
13.
ClarkM. S.MoninJ. K. (2006). Giving and receiving communal responsiveness as love. In SternbergR. J.WeisK. (Eds.), The new psychology of love (pp. 200–221). Yale University Press.
14.
ClarkM. S.OuelletteR.PowellM. C.MilbergS. (1987). Recipient’s mood, relationship type, and helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(1), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.94
15.
CollinsN. L.FeeneyB. C. (2000). A safe haven: An attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(6), 1053–1073. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1053
16.
CollinsN. L.FeeneyB. C. (2004). Working models of attachment shape perceptions of social support: Evidence from experimental and observational studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(3), 363–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.363
17.
EndersC. K.TofighiD. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121
18.
FeeneyB. C.CollinsN. L. (2001). Predictors of caregiving in adult intimate relationships: An attachment theoretical perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(6), 972–994. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.972
19.
FeeneyJ. A. (2002). Attachment, marital interaction, and relationship satisfaction: A diary study. Personal Relationships, 9(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6811.00003
20.
FelmleeD.SprecherS.BassinE. (1990). The dissolution of intimate relationships: A hazard model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53(1), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786866
21.
FinkelE. J.RusbultC. E.KumashiroM.HannonP. A. (2002). Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: Does commitment promote forgiveness?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 956–974. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.956
22.
FraleyR. C.WallerN. G.BrennanK. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.350
23.
HolmesJ. G.RempelJ. K. (1989). Trust in close relationships. In HendrickC. (Ed.), Close relationships (pp. 187–220). Sage Publications, Inc.
24.
Holt-LunstadJ.SmithT. B.LaytonJ. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLoS Medicine, 7(7), Article e1000316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316
25.
JoelS.MacDonaldG.ShimotomaiA. (2011). Conflicting pressures on romantic relationship commitment for anxiously attached individuals. Journal of Personality, 79(1), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00680.x
26.
JohnsonD. J.RusbultC. E. (1989). Resisting temptation: Devaluation of alternative partners as a means of maintaining commitment in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 967–980. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.967
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. Guilford Press.
29.
LemayE. P.Jr.ClarkM. S.FeeneyB. C. (2007). Projection of responsiveness to needs and the construction of satisfying communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(5), 834–853. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.834
30.
LemayE. P.Jr.LinJ. L.MuirH. J. (2015). Daily affective and behavioral forecasts in romantic relationships: Seeing tomorrow through the lens of today. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(7), 1005–1019. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215588756
31.
LemayE. P.Jr.NealA. M. (2014). Accurate and biased perceptions of responsive support predict well-being. Motivation and Emotion, 38(2), 270–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-013-9381-2
MacKinnonD. P.LockwoodC. M.WilliamsJ. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4
34.
MikulincerM. (1998). Attachment working models and the sense of trust: An exploration of interaction goals and affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1209–1224. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1209
35.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. Guilford Press.
36.
MillerR. S. (1997). Inattentive and contented: Relationship commitment and attention to alternatives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(4), 758–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.4.758
37.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.CollinsN. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 641–666. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.641
38.
MurrayS. L.BellaviaG. M.RoseP.GriffinD. W. (2003). Once hurt, twice hurtful: How perceived regard regulates daily marital interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 126–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.126
39.
PietromonacoP. R.BeckL. A. (2015). Attachment processes in adult romantic relationships. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R.SimpsonJ. A.DovidioJ. F. (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology (Vol. 3): Interpersonal relations (pp. 33–64). American Psychological Association.
40.
RempelJ. K.HolmesJ. G.ZannaM. P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.95
41.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton University Press.
42.
RusbultC. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.101
43.
RusbultC. E.DrigotasS. M.VeretteJ. (1994). The investment model: An interdependence analysis of commitment processes and relationship maintenance phenomena. In CanaryD. J.StaffordL. (Eds.), Communication and relational maintenance (pp. 115–139). Academic Press.
44.
RusbultC. E.MartzJ. M.AgnewC. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5(4), 357–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x
45.
RusbultC. E.VeretteJ.WhitneyG. A.SlovikL. F.LipkusI. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(1), 53–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.1.53
46.
SeligJ. P.PreacherK. J. (2008). Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects [Computer software]. Available fromhttps://quantpsy.org/
47.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S.PhillipsD. (1996). Conflict in close relationships: An attachment perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(5), 899–914. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.5.899
48.
Van LangeP. A. M.RusbultC. E.DrigotasS. M.ArriagaX. B.WitcherB. S.CoxC. L. (1997). Willingness to sacrifice in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1373–1395. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.6.1373
49.
WieselquistJ.RusbultC. E.FosterC. A.AgnewC. R. (1999). Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(5), 942–966. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.942
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
