Two studies examined how committed people perceived their partners’ social media behaviors and how the presence of these behaviors impacted feelings of relationship security and satisfaction. Study 1 identified the specific social media behaviors that signal commitment by a romantic partner. Study 2 then manipulated the identified partner social media behaviors to examine if buffering occurred for people with high levels of attachment insecurity. Study 2 found that when a person was led to believe their partner engaged in high commitment online behaviors, they reported greater felt relationship security and relationship satisfaction. Attachment avoidance, but not attachment anxiety, moderated the manipulation’s effect on relationship satisfaction. Perceiving that a partner signals high commitment when the threat of online alternatives is salient may be one specific route to mitigate attachment avoidance’s impact on relationship satisfaction.
ArriagaX. B.KumashiroM.FinkelE. J.VanderDriftL. E.LuchiesL. B. (2014). Filling the void: Bolstering attachment security in committed relationships. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(4), 398–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613509287
2.
ArriagaX. B.KumashiroM.SimpsonJ. A.OverallN. C. (2018). Revising working models across time: Relationship situations that enhance attachment security. Personality and Social Psychology Review: An Official Journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc, 22(1), 71–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317705257
3.
BevanJ. L. (2017a). Liking, creeping, and password sharing: Romantic jealousy experience and expression and social networking sites. In Punyanunt-CarterN. M.WrenchJ. S. (Eds.), The impact of social media in modern romantic relationships (pp. 165–180). Lexington Books.
4.
BevanJ. L. (2017b). Romantic jealousy in face-to-face and technologically-mediated interactions: A communicative interdependence perspective. Western Journal of Communication, 81(4), 466–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2017.1283048
5.
BlackA. E.ReisH. T. (2022). Is my partner committed to me or tempted by others?: Perceptions of the partner’s devaluation of alternatives. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology, 3, 100042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2022.100042
BowlbyJ. (1973) Attachment and loss: Separation, anxiety and anger (Vol. 2). Basic Books.
8.
BradyA.BakerL. R. (2022). The changing tides of attractive alternatives in romantic relationships: Recent societal changes compel new directions for future research. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 16(1), Article e12650. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12650
9.
BrodyN.LeFebvreL. E.BlackburnK. G. (2016). Social networking site behaviors across the relational lifespan: Measurement and association with relationship escalation and de- escalation. Social Media + Society, 2(4), 205630511668000. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116680004
10.
BuunkB. P. (1997). Personality, birth order and attachment styles as related to various types of jealousy. Personality and Individual Differences, 23(6), 997–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(97)00136-0
11.
CampbellL.SimpsonJ. A.BoldryJ.KashyD. A. (2005). Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: The role of attachment anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3), 510–531. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.510
12.
DeWallC. N.LambertN. M.SlotterE. B.PondR. S.JrDeckmanT.FinkelE. J.LuchiesL. B.FinchamF. D. (2011). So far away from one's partner, yet so close to romantic alternatives: Avoidant attachment, interest in alternatives, and infidelity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1302–1316. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025497
13.
DrouinM.MillerD. A.DibbleJ. L. (2015). Facebook or memory: Which is the real threat to your relationship?Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 18(10), 561–566. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0259
14.
EllisonN. B.SteinfieldC.LampeC. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer‐mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143–1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
15.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G* power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
16.
FleurietC.ColeM.GuerreroL. K. (2014). Exploring Facebook: Attachment style and nonverbal message characteristics as predictors of anticipated emotional reactions to Facebook postings. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 38, 429–450.
17.
FraleyR. C. (2019). Attachment in adulthood: Recent developments, emerging debates, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 70(70), 401–422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102813
18.
FraleyR. C.WallerN. G.BrennanK. A. (2000). An item-response theory analysis of self- report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.78.2.350
19.
FramptonJ. R.FoxJ. (2018). Social media’s role in romantic partners’ retroactive jealousy: Social comparison, uncertainty, and information seeking. Social Media + Society, 4(3), 205630511880031. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118800317
20.
FunkJ. L.RoggeR. D. (2007). Testing the ruler with item response theory: Increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. Journal of Family Psychology: JFP: Journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43), 21(4), 572–583. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572
21.
GirmeY. U.AgnewC. R.VanderDriftL. E.HarveyS. M.RholesW. S.SimpsonJ. A. (2018). The ebbs and flows of attachment: Within-person variation in attachment undermine secure individuals’ relationship wellbeing across time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(3), 397–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000115
HuelsnitzC. O.FarrellA.K.SimpsonJ.A.GriskeviciusV.SzepsenwolO. (2018). Attachment and jealousy: Understanding the dynamic experience of jealousy using the Response Escalation Paradigm. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(12), 1664–1680.
26.
JoelS.ImpettE. A.SpielmannS. S.MacDonaldG. (2018). How interdependent are stay/leave decisions? On staying in the relationship for the sake of the romantic partner. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(5), 805–824. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000139
27.
KimK. J.FeeneyB. C.JakubiakB. K. (2018). Touch reduces romantic jealousy in the anxiously attached. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35(7), 1019–1041. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517702012
28.
KruegerK. L.ForestA. L. (2020). Communicating commitment: A relationship-protection account of dyadic displays on social media. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(7), 1059–1073. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219893998
29.
La GuardiaJ. G.RyanR. M.CouchmanC. E.DeciE. L. (2000). Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(3), 367–384. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.79.3.367
30.
MarshallT. C.BejanyanK.Di CastroG.LeeR. A. (2013). Attachment styles as predictors of Facebook‐related jealousy and surveillance in romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 20(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01393.x
31.
McDanielB. T.DrouinM.CravensJ. D. (2017). Do you have anything to hide? Infidelity- related behaviors on social media sites and marital satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.031
MillerM.DenesA.DiazB.BuckR. (2014). Attachment style predicts jealous reactions to viewing touch between a romantic partner and close friend: Implications for internet social communication. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 38(4), 451–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10919-014-0196-y
34.
MuiseA.ChristofidesE.DesmaraisS. (2009). More information than you ever wanted: Does Facebook bring out the green-eyed monster of jealousy?Cyberpsychology & Behavior: The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society, 12(4), 441–444. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2008.0263
35.
MurrayS. L.BellaviaG. M.RoseP.GriffinD. W. (2003). Once hurt, twice hurtful: How perceived regard regulates daily marital interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 126–147. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.126
36.
NealA. M.LemayE. P. (2017). The wandering eye perceives more threats: Projection of attraction to alternative partners predicts anger and negative behavior in romantic relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(2), 450–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517734398
37.
OverallN. C.SibleyC. G. (2008). Attachment and attraction toward romantic partners versus relevant alternatives within daily interactions. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(5), 1126–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.11.006
OwenJ.RhoadesG. K.StanleyS. M.MarkmanH. J. (2011). The revised commitment Inventory: Psychometrics and use with unmarried couples. Journal of Family Issues, 32(6), 820–841. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X10385788
40.
RodriguezL. M.FilloJ.HaddenB. W.ØverupC. S.BakerZ. G.DiBelloA. M. (2019). Do you see what I see? Actor and partner attachment shape biased perceptions of partners. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 45(4), 587–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218791782
41.
RusbultC. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(1), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.101
42.
SharpsteenD. J.KirkpatrickL. A. (1997). Romantic jealousy and adult romantic attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 627–640.
43.
SibleyC. G.LiuJ. H. (2004). Short-term temporal stability and factor structure of the revised experiences in close relationships (ECR-R) measure of adult attachment. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(4), 969–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(03)00165-x
44.
TandonA.DhirA.MäntymäkiM. (2021). Jealousy due to social media? A systematic literature review and framework of social media-induced jealousy. Internet Research, 31(5), 1541–1582. https://doi.org/10.1108/intr-02-2020-0103
45.
TokunagaR. S. (2011). Social networking site or social surveillance site? Understanding the use of interpersonal electronic surveillance in romantic relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 705–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.014
46.
Toplu-DemirtaşE.Akcabozan-KayabolN. B.Araci-IyiaydinA.FinchamF. D. (2022). Unraveling the roles of distrust, suspicion of infidelity, and jealousy in cyber dating abuse perpetration: An attachment theory perspective. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(3-4), NP1432–NP1462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520927505
47.
YoungL.KolubinskiD. C.FringsD. (2020). Attachment style moderates the relationship between social media use and user mental health and wellbeing. Heliyon, 6(6), Article e04056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04056
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
