Drawing the line at infidelity: Negotiating relationship morality in a Swedish context of consensual non-monogamy

Abstract

Consensual non-monogamy (CNM) involves being in a relationship that allows participants multiple concurrent sexual and/or intimate partners. Previous studies exploring attitudes toward different types of extra-dyadic sexual activity (EDSA) has typically distinguished between, on the one hand, polyamory/open relationships/swinging and, on the other, infidelity. The aim of this article is to develop further these discussions by showing how the distinctions between relationship types are drawn and/or blurred in social interactions, and how this requires moral work and negotiations of what ethical polyamory is. The research questions are as follows: 1. How are different CNM relationship types distinguished from each other, as well as intertwined and negotiated in social interactions? 2. How are ideals of consent, honesty, and communication reproduced and renegotiated in CNM relationships? 3. How does moral work become important for responding to negative attitudes toward CNM? The material consists of interviews with 22 persons practicing polyamory, CNM, or relationship anarchy, analyzed using thematic analysis. Results show that CNM relationship types are not clearly distinguishable but rather negotiated in social interactions both within a relationship and with others. Interviewees express that consent, honesty, and communication are central for their relationships, but also that they are negotiated. For example, honesty can be renegotiated by introducing an option of not telling your partner everything. Consent can also be renegotiated with some conditions, such as not actively searching out potential partners. They describe several different types of moral work: negotiating and reformulating others’ moral opinions, reversing moral hierarchies, and taking responsibility to explain and to soothe situations. These results contribute to existing research on attitudes toward CNM practices pointing out the importance of taking social interactions into account in order to explore the full extent of negative attitudes toward people involved in CNM relationships and how they handle these interactions.

Keywords

Consensual non-monogamy infidelity moral work ethical polyamory Sweden

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adeniji

(2001). Ordningsstörande begär. Biteori som kritik av antropologisk sexualitetsforskning [Disturbing desires. Bitheory as a critique of anthropological sexuality studies]. Lambda Nordica, 5(1–2), 54–69.

Anapol

(2010). Polyamory in the 21st century. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

Anderson

(2010). At least with cheating there is an attempt at monogamy’: Cheating and monosexism among undergraduate heterosexual men. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(7), 851–872. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407510373908

Andersson

Carlström

(2019). More-than-two-parent families displaying legitimate parenthood in Swedish media. Lambda Nordica, 24(2-3), 81–103.

Andersson

Carlström

(2021). Polyamorous parenthood – kinship, gender and morality”. In Wahlström Henriksson

Goedecke

(Ed.), Close Relations. Family, kinship and beyond (pp. 139-153). Springer.

Andersson

(2017). Governing through love. Same-sex cohabitation in Sweden. Sexualities, 20(5–6), 604–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460716665788

Bertilsdotter Rosqvist

(2007). Lagom lika, lagom olika: en diskussion om makt, retorik och bi-teoretiska/sexuella subjektiviteter. [Sufficiently similar, sufficiently different: a discussion of power, rhetoric and bi-theoretical/sexual subjectivities. Umeå: h:ström.

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Carlström

Andersson

(2019). ‘Living outside of protocol’ – Polyamorous orientations, bodies and queer temporalities. Sexuality & Culture, 23(4), 1315–1331.

10.

Conley

T. D.

Moors

A. C.

Matsick

J. L.

Ziegler

(2013). The fewer the merrier? assessing stigma surrounding consensually non-monogamous romantic relationships. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2012.01286.x

11.

De Graeve

(2019). ‘No expectations’: Straight men’s sexual and moral identity-making in non-monogamous dating. Sexualities, 22(5–6), 844–859. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460718779946

12.

Deri

(2015). Love’s refraction. Jealousy and compersion in queer polyamorous relationships. University of Toronto Press.

13.

Drew

(1998). Complaints about transgressions and misconduct. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 31(3–4), 295–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.1998.9683595

14.

Grunt-Mejer

Campbell

(2016). Around consensual nonmonogamies: Assessing attitudes toward nonexclusive relationships. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1010193

15.

Gustavson

(2003). Bisexuella trekanter och tvetydigheter: bisexualitet som teori och kritik mot tvåsamhetnormen. [Bisexual threesomes and ambiguities: bisexuality as theory and critique of the norm of coupledom. Lambda Nordica, 9(1–2), 39–44.

16.

Gustavson

(2006). Blandade känslor: bisexuella kvinnors praktik & politik. [Mixed feelings: bisexual women’s practices and politics. Göteborg: Kabusa böcker.

17.

Hacking

(1999). The social construction of what? Harvard University Press.

18.

Hangen

Crasta

Rogge

R. D.

(2020). Delineating the boundaries between nonmonogamy and infidelity: Bringing consent back into definitions of consensual nonmonogamy with latent profile analysis. The Journal of Sex Research, 57(4), 438–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1669133

19.

Hutzler

K. T.

Giuliano

T. A.

Herselman

J. R.

Johnson

S. M.

(2016). Three’s a crowd: Public awareness and (mis)perceptions pf polyamory. Psychology & Sexuality, 7(2), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2015.1004102

20.

Inglehart

Haerpfer

Moreno

Welzel

Kizilova

Diez-Medrano

(2014). World values survey: Round six - country-pooled datafile version. JD Systems Institute. www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationW

21.

Jackson

Scott

(2004). The personal is still political: Heterosexuality, feminism and monogamy. Feminism & Psychology, 14(1), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353504040317

22.

Klesse

(2006). Polyamory and its ‘others’: Contesting the terms of non-monogamy. Sexualities, 9(5), 565–583. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460706069986

23.

Klesse

(2007). The spectre of promiscuity: Gay male and bisexual non-monogamies and polyamories. Ashgate.

24.

Lano

(1995). The history of non-monogamous Lifestyles. In Lano

Parry

(Eds.), Breaking the barriers to desire polyamory, polyfidelity and non-monogamy: New approaches to multiple relationships (pp. 68–78). Five Leaves Publications.

25.

Mägi

Zimmerman

L.-l.

(2015). Stjärnfamiljejuridik. Svensk familjelagstiftning ur ett normkritiskt perspektiv. Malmö: Gleerups.

26.

Matsick

J. L.

Conley

T. D.

Ziegler

Moors

A. C.

Rubin

J. D.

(2014). Love and sex: Polyamorous relationships are perceived more favourably than swinging and open relationships. Psychology & Sexuality, 5(4), 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2013.832934

27.

Mattingly

(2013). Moral selves and moral scenes: Narrative experiments in everyday life. Ethnos, 78(3), 301–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2012.691523

28.

May

(2008). On being a ‘good’ mother: The moral presentation of self in written life stories. Sociology, 42(3), 470–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508088836

29.

Mint

(2004). The power dynamics of cheating. Journal of Bisexuality, 4(3–4), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1300/j159v04n03_04

30.

Norberg

(2009). Samkönad tvåsamhet: Vardagsliv och heteronormativa praktiker. Umeå: Sociologiska institutionen. Umeå universitet.

31.

Nordgren

(2012). The short instructional manifesto for relationship anarchy. https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/andie-nordgren-the-short-instructional-manifesto-for-relationship-anarchy (accessed 26 April 2021).

32.

Pallotta-Chiarolli

(2010). To pass, border or pollute’: Polyfamilies go to school. In Barker

Langdridge

(Eds.), Safe, sane and consensual: Contemporary perspectives on sadomasochism. Routledge.

33.

Richardson

(2005). Desiring sameness? The rise of a neoliberal politics of normalisation. Antipode, 37(3), 515–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00509.x

34.

Ritchie

Barker

(2006). ‘There aren’t words for what we do or how we feel so we have to make them up’: Constructing polyamorous languages in a culture of compulsory monogamy. Sexualities, 9(5), 584–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460706069987

35.

Robinson

(1997). My baby just cares for me: Feminism, heterosexuality and non-monogamy. Journal of Gender Studies, 6(4), 143–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.1997.9960678

36.

Roseneil

(2006). On not living with a partner: Unpicking coupledom and cohabitation. Sociological Research Online, 11(3), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1413

37.

Ryan

Bissell

Alexander

(2010). Moral work in women's narratives of breastfeeding. Social Science & Medicine, 70(6), 951–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.11.023

38.

Samuels

(2010). Promiscuities. In Barker

Langdridge

(Eds.), Politics, imagination, spirituality and hypocrisy (pp. 121-221). Routledge.

39.

Séguin

L. J.

(2019). The good, the bad, and the ugly: Lay attitudes and perceptions of polyamory. Sexualities, 22(4), 669–690.

40.

Sheff

Hammers

(2011). The privilege of perversities: Race, class and education among polyamorists and kinksters. Psychology & Sexuality, 2(3), 198–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2010.537674

41.

Skeggs

(1997). Formations of class and gender: Becoming respectable. Sage.

42.

Smart

Neale

(1997). Good enough morality? Divorce and postmodernity. Critical Social Policy, 17(53), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/026101839701705301

43.

Table

Sandoval

J. A.

Weger

(2017). Transitions in polyamorous identity and intercultural communication: An application of identity management theory. Journal of Bisexuality, 17(3), 277–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/15299716.2017.1350897

44.

Tileaga

(2007). Ideologies of moral exclusion: A critical discursivereframing of depersonalization, delegitimization and dehumanization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46(Pt 4), 717–737.

45.

Tweedy

A. E.

(2011). Polyamory as a sexual orientation. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 79(4), 1461–1515.

46.

Widmer

E. D.

Treas

Newcomb

(1998). Attitudes toward nonmarital sex in 24 countries. Journal of Sex Research, 35(4), 349–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499809551953

47.

Wosick-Correa

(2010). Agreements, rules and agentic fidelity in polyamorous relationships. Psychology & Sexuality, 1(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419891003634471