Stay-at-home orders issued to combat the growing number of infections during the coronavirus pandemic in 2020 had many psychological consequences for people including elevated stress, anxiety, and difficulty maintaining meaning in their lives. The present studies utilized cross-sectional designs and were conducted to better understand how social media usage related to people’s subjective isolation (i.e., social loneliness, emotional loneliness, and existential isolation) and meaning in life (MIL) during the early months of the pandemic within the United States. Study 1 found that general social media use indirectly predicted higher MIL via lower existential isolation and social isolation. Study 2 replicated these patterns and found that social media use also predicted lower MIL via higher emotional loneliness, and that the aforementioned effects occurred with active, but not passive, social media use. Findings suggest social media use may be a viable means to validate one’s experiences (i.e., reduce existential isolation) during the pandemic but may also lead to intensified feelings concerning missing others (i.e., increased emotional loneliness). This research also helps to identify potential divergent effects of social media on MIL and helps to clarify the relationships among varying types of subjective isolation.
AllingtonD.DuffyB.WesselyS.DhavanN.RubinJ. (2020). Health-protective behavior, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency. Psychological Medicine, 51(10), 1763–1769. https://doi.org/10.1017/s003329172000224x.
2.
ArndtJ.LandauM. J.VailK. E.,IIIVessM. (2013). An edifice for enduring personal value: A terror management perspective on the human quest for multi-level meaning. In MarkmanK.ProulxT.LindbergM. (Eds.), The psychology of meaning (pp. 49–69). APA. https://doi.org/10.1037/14040-003.
3.
BanerjeeD.RaiM. (2020). Social isolation in Covid-19: The impact of loneliness. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 66(6), 525–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764020922269.
4.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173.
5.
Berg-WegerM.MorleyJ. E. (2020). Loneliness and social isolation in older adults during the Covid-19 pandemic: Implications for gerontological social work. Journal of Nutrition, Health and Aging, 24(5), 456–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-020-1366-8.
6.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
7.
BergerP. L.LuckmannT. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor Books.
8.
BrailovskaiaJ.TeichertT. (2020). “I like it” and “I need it”: Relationship between implicit associations, flow, and addictive social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 113, 106509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106509.
9.
BurkeM.KrautR. E. (2016). The relationship between Facebook use and well-being depends on communication type and tie strength. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(4), 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12162.
10.
BurkeM.MarlowC.LentoT. (2010). Social network activity and social well-being. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, GA, 10–15 April 2010. pp. 1909–1912. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753613.
11.
CacioppoJ. T.FowlerJ. H.CristakisN. A. (2009). Alone in the crowd: The structure and spread of loneliness in a large social network. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 977–991. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016076.
CinelliM.QuattrociocchiW.GaleazziA.ValensiseC. M.BrugnoliE.SchmidtA. L.ZolaPZolloF.ScalaA. (2020). The covid-19 social media infodemic. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 16598. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73510-5.
14.
De Jong GierveldJ.Van TilburgT. G. (2006). A six-item scale for overall, emotional and social loneliness: Confirmative tests on new survey data. Research on Aging, 28(5), 582–598. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027506289723.
15.
De Jong GierveldJ.Van TillburgT. (2010). The De Jong Gierveld short scales for emotional and social loneliness: Tested on data from 7 countries in the UN generations and gender surveys. European Journal of Aging, 7(2), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-010-0144-6.
16.
DetersF. G.MehlM. R. (2013). Does posting Facebook status updates increase or decrease loneliness? An online social networking experiment. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(5), 579–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612469233.
17.
DhirA.YossatornY.KaurP.ChenS. (2018). Online social media fatigue and psychological wellbeing—A study of compulsive use, fear of missing out, fatigue, anxiety and depression. International Journal of Information Management, 40(2), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.01.012.
18.
DomahidiE. (2018). The associations between online media use and users’ perceived social resources: A meta-analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(4), 181–200. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmy007.
19.
EchterhoffG.HigginsE. T.LevineJ. M. (2009). Shared reality: Experiencing commonality with others inner states about the world. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(5), 496–521. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01161.x.
20.
EdwardsM. E.Van TongerenD. R. (2019). Meaning mediates the association between suffering and well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 15(6), 722–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2019.1651890.
21.
FardoulyJ.DiedrichsP. C.VartanianL. R.HalliwellE. (2015). Social comparisons on social media: The impact of Facebook on young women’s body image concerns and mood. Body Image, 13, 38-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2014.12.002.
FrisonE.EggermontS. (2016). Exploring the relationships between different types of Facebook use, perceived online social support, and adolescents’ depressed mood. Social Science Computer Review, 34(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314567449.
25.
GaoJ.ZhengP.JiaY.ChenH.MaoY.ChenS.FuH.DaiJ. (2020). Mental health problems and social media exposure during COVID-19 outbreak. Plos One, 15(4), e0231924. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231924.
GersonJ.PlagnolA.CorrP. J. (2017). Passive and active Facebook use measure (PAUM): Validation and relationship to reinforcement sensitivity theory. Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.05.034.
28.
GilmourJ.MachinT.BrownlowC.JeffriesC. (2020). Facebook-based social support and health: A systematic review. Psychology of Popular Media, 9(3), 328–346. https://doi.org/10.1037/ppm0000246.
29.
GreenbergJ.SolomonS.ArndtJ. (2008). A basic but uniquely human motivation: Terror management. In ShahJ. Y.GardnerW. L. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 114–134). Guilford.
30.
HallJ. A. (2018). Energy, episode, and relationship: A test of communicate bond belong theory. Communication Quarterly, 66(4), 380–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2017.1411377.
31.
HallJ. A. (2019). How many hours does it take to make a friend?Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(4), 1278–1296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518761225.
32.
HallJ. A.DavisD. C. (2017). Proposing the communicate bond belong theory: Evolutionary intersections with episodic interpersonal communication. Communication Theory, 27(1), 21–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12106.
HayesA. F. (2012). Process: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. AF Hayes. http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
35.
HelmP. J.LifshinU.ChauR.GreenbergJ. (2019). Existential isolation and death thought accessibility. Journal of Research in Personality, 82, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103845.
36.
HelmP. J.RothschildL. G.GreenbergJ.CroftA. (2018). Explaining sex differences in existential isolation research. Personality and Individual Differences, 134, 283-288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.06.032.
37.
HelmP. J.GreenbergJ.ParkY. C.PinelE. C. (2019). Feeling alone in your subjectivity: Introducing the state trait existential isolation model (STEIM). Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 3(3), 146–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.41.
38.
HelmP. J.JimenezT.BultmannM.LifshinU.GreenbergJ.ArndtJ. (2020). Existential isolation, loneliness, and attachment in young adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 159, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.109890.
39.
HicksJ. A.SchlegelR. J.KingL. A. (2010). Social threats, happiness, and the dynamics of meaning in life judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(10), 1305–1317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210381650.
40.
JuddC. M.KennyD. A. (1981). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5(5), 602–619. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x8100500502.
KimJ. Y.ChungN.AhnK. M. (2013). Why people use social networking services in Korea: The mediating role of self-disclosure on subjective well-being. Information Development, 30(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0266666913489894.
43.
KingL. A.HeintzelmanS. J.WardS. J. (2016). Beyond the search for meaning: A contemporary science of the experience of meaning in life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(4), 211–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416656354.
44.
KrasnovaH.WidjajaT.BuxmannP.WenningerH.BenbasatI. (2015). Research note—Why following friends can hurt you: An networking sites among college-age users. Information Systems Research, 26(3), 585–605. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0588.
45.
LambertN. M.StillmanT. F.HicksJ. A.KambleS.BaumeisterR. F.FinchamF. D. (2013). To belong is to matter: Sense of belonging enhances meaning in life. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(11), 1418–1427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213499186.
46.
LinL. (2021). Longitudinal associations of meaning in life and psychosocial adjustment to the COVID‐19 outbreak in China. British Journal of Health Psychology, 26(2), 525–534. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12492.
47.
LitmanL.RobinsonJ.AbberbockT. (2017). TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z.
LouL. L.YanZ.NickersonA.McMorrisR. (2012). An examination of the reciprocal relationship of loneliness and Facebook use among first-year college students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(1), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.2190/ec.46.1.e.
50.
MarinoC.GiniG.VienoA.SpadaM. M. (2018). The associations between problematic Facebook use, psychological distress and well-being among adolescents and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 226, 274-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.10.007.
51.
MaxwellS. E.ColeD. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.23.
52.
MeierA.ReineckeL. (2020). Computer-mediated communication, social media, and mental health: A conceptual and empirical meta-review. Communication Research, 48(8), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220958224.
53.
MellishT. I.LuzmoreN. J.ShahbazA. A. (2020). Why were the UK and USA unprepared for the COVID-19 pandemic? The systemic weaknesses of neoliberalism: a comparison between the UK, USA, Germany, and South Korea. Journal of Global Faultlines, 7(1), 9–45. https://doi.org/10.13169/jglobfaul.7.1.0009.
54.
NunnallyJ. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (3rd ed). McGraw-Hill.
55.
OrbenA. (2020). Teenagers, screens and social media: A narrative review of reviews and key studies. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 55(4), 407–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-019-01825-4.
56.
PenningtonN. (2021). Communication outside of the home through social media during COVID-19. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 4, 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100118.
57.
PerlmanD.PeplauL. A. (1981). Toward a Social Psychology of Loneliness. In DwakS.GilmourR. (Eds.), Personal Relationships in Disorder (pp. 32-56). London: Academic Press.
PfefferbaumB.NorthC. S. (2020). Mental health and the Covid-19 pandemic. New England Journal of Medicine, 383(12), 510–512. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2008017.
60.
PietersR. (2017). Meaningful mediation analysis: Plausible causal inference and informative communication. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(3), 692–716. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx081.
61.
PinelE. C.LongA. E.MurdochE. Q.HelmP. (2017). A prisoner of one’s own mind: Identifying and understanding existential isolation. Personality and Individual Differences, 105, 54-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.09.024.
62.
PittmanM.ReichB. (2016). Social media and loneliness: Why an Instagram picture may be worth more than a thousand Twitter words. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 155-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.084.
63.
RaeJ. R.LonborgS. D. (2015). Do motivations for using Facebook moderate the association between Facebook use and psychological. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 771-779. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00771.
64.
RajkumarR. P. (2020). COVID-19 and mental health: A review of the existing literature. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 52, 102066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102066.
65.
ScharkowM. (2016). The accuracy of self-reported internet use—A validation study using client log data. Communication Methods and Measures, 10(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2015.1118446.
66.
SeabrookE. M.KernM. L.RickardN. S. (2016). Social networking sites, depression, and anxiety: A systematic review. JMIR Mental Health, 3(4), e50. https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.5842.
67.
ShawA. M.TimpanoK. R.TranT. B.JoormannJ. (2015). Correlates of Facebook usage patterns: The relationship between passive Facebook use, social anxiety symptoms, and brooding. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 575-580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.003.
StegerM. F. (2017). Meaning in life and wellbeing. In SladeM.OadesL.JordanA. (Eds.), Wellbeing, recovery, and mental health (pp. 75–85). Cambridge University Press.
70.
StegerM. F.FrazierP.OishiS.KalerM. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(1), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80.
71.
StillmanT. F.BaumeisterR. F.LambertN. M.CrescioniA. W.DeWallC. N.FinchamF. D. (2009). Alone and without purpose: Life loses meaning following social exclusion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 686–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.007.
72.
SwannW. B.Stein-SeroussiA.GieslerR. B. (1992). Why people self-verify. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(3), 392-401. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.3.392.
73.
SyK. T. L.MartinezM. E.RaderB.WhiteL. F. (2021). Socioeconomic disparities in subway use and COVID-19 outcomes in New York City. American Journal of Epidemiology, 190(7), 1234–1242. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwaa277.
74.
ThomasL.OrmeE.KerriganF. (2020). Student loneliness: The role of social media through life transitions. Computers & Education, 146, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103754.
75.
TobinS. J.VanmanE. J.VerreynneM.SaeriA. K. (2014). Threats to belonging on Facebook: Lurking and ostracism. Social Influence, 10(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2014.893924.
76.
TrzebińskiJ.CabańskiM.CzarneckaJ. Z. (2020). Reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic: The influence of meaning in life, life satisfaction and assumptions on world orderliness and positivity. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 25(6–7), 1–14.
77.
UsherK.BhullarN.JacksonD. (2020). Life in the pandemic: Social isolation and mental health. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(15–16), 2756–2757. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15290.
78.
VannucciA.FlanneryK. M.OhannessianC. M. (2017). Social media use and anxiety in emerging adults. Journal of Affective Disorders, 207, 163-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2016.08.040.
79.
VannucciA.OhannessianC. M. (2019). Social media use subgroups differentially predict psychosocial well-being during early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(8), 1469–1493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01060-9.
80.
VerduynP.LeeD. S.ParkJ.ShablackH.OrvellA.BayerJ.YbarraJonidesO.J.KrossE. (2015). Passive Facebook usage undermines affective well-being: Experimental and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(2), 480-488. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000057.
81.
VerduynP.YbarraO.RésiboisM.JonidesJ.KrossE. (2017). Do social network sites enhance or undermine subjective well-being? A critical review. Social Issues and Policy Review, 11(1), 274–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.12033.
82.
WeissR. S. (1973). Loneliness: The experience of emotional and social isolation. MIT Press.
83.
WenningerH.KrasnovaH.BuxmannP. (2014). Activity matters: Investigating the influence of Facebook on life satisfaction of teenage users. In AvitalM.LeimeisterJ. M.SchultzeU. (Eds.), Twenty second European conference on information systems (pp. 1–18). ECIS.
84.
WiedermannW.von EyeA. (2015). Direction of effects in mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 20(2), 221–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000027.
WoodsH. C.ScottH. (2016). #Sleepyteens: Social media use in adolescence is associated with poor sleep quality, anxiety, depression and low self-esteem. Journal of Adolescence, 51, 41-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.05.008.
87.
YalomI. D. (1980). Existential psychotherapy. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
