A longitudinal survey study was conducted to examine which strategies for reducing cognitive dissonance were used among men engaging in infidelity. Data were collected in two waves, 1 month apart (ntime1 = 1514, ntime2 = 425), from a sample of male users of Ashley Madison, a “married dating” site targeting users who are seeking to engage in infidelity. Because perpetrators of infidelity may justify their behaviors differently depending on whether they cheated in an online environment, both online and offline infidelity behaviors were considered. Results indicated that attitude change and self-concept change were positively related to online infidelity, while only self-concept change was positively related to offline infidelity, suggesting their differential effectiveness for various communication media. Self-concept change, attitude change, and denial of responsibility were negatively related to psychological discomfort and perceived negative impact at time 2, indicating their relative success for reducing negative psychological outcomes compared to other strategies such as adding consonant cognitions.
AlexopoulosC.SharabiL.UhlichM.TimmermansE. B. R. (2020). The ups and downs of stepping out: Infidelity-induced self-concept change [Paper presentation]. International Communication Association, Denver, CO.
2.
AlexopoulosC.TimmermansE. B. R.McNallieJ. (2020). Swiping more, committing less: Unraveling the link between dating app use and intention to commit infidelity. Computers and Human Behavior, 102, 172–180.
AndersonE. (2010). “At least with cheating there is an attempt at monogamy”: Cheating and monogamism among undergraduate heterosexual men. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(7), 851–872.
5.
BachmanG. F.GuerreroL. K. (2006). Relational quality and communicative responses following hurtful events in dating relationships: An expectancy violations analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 943–963. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407506070476
6.
BanfieldS.McCabeM. P. (2001). Extra relationship involvement among women: Are they different from men?Archives of Sexual Behavior, 30, 119–142. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002773100507
7.
BartaW. D.KieneS. M. (2005). Motivations for infidelity in heterosexual dating couples: The roles of gender, personality differences, and sociosexual orientation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 339–360.
8.
BauerleS. Y.AmirkhanJ. H.HupkaR. B. (2002). An attribution theory analysis of romantic jealousy. Motivation and Emotion, 26, 297–319. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022871104307
BrockT. C.BallounJ. L. (1967). Behavioral receptivity to dissonant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 413–428. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021225
11.
BuunkB. P.BakkerA. B. (1995). Extradyadic sex: The role of descriptive and injunctive norms. Journal of Sex Research, 32, 313–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499509551804
12.
CooperJ. (2007). Cognitive dissonance: Fifty years of a classic theory. SAGE.
13.
CottonJ. L. (1985). Cognitive dissonance in selective exposure. In ZillmanD.BryantJ. (Eds.), Selective exposure to communication (pp. 11–33). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14.
DenesA.LannuttiP. J.BevanJ. L. (2015). Same-sex infidelity in heterosexual romantic relationships: Investigating emotional, relational, and communicative responses. Personal Relationships, 22, 414–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12087
15.
DrakeC. R.McCabeM. P. (2000). Extrarelationship involvement among heterosexual males: An explanation based on the theory of planned behavior, relationship quality, and past behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 1421–1439. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02528.x
16.
ElkinR. A.LeippeM. R. (1986). Physiological arousal, dissonance, and attitude change: Evidence for a dissonance–arousal link and a “don’t remind me” effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.55
17.
ElliotA. J.DevineP. G. (1994). On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 382–394.
18.
Emmers-SommerT. M.WarberK.HalfordJ. (2010). Reasons for (non) engagement in infidelity. Marriage & Family Review, 46(6–7), 420–444.
19.
FalconerT.HumphreysT. P. (2019). Sexting outside the primary relationship: Prevalence, relationship influences, physical engagement, and perceptions of “cheating”. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 28, 134–142.
20.
FeldmanS.CauffmanE. (1999). Your cheatin’ heart: Attitudes, behaviors, and correlates of sexual betrayal in late adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescents, 9, 227–252. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327795jra0903_1
21.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance (Vol. 2). Stanford University Press.
22.
FinchamF. D.BradburyT. N. (1992). Assessing attributions in marriage: The relationship attribution measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 457–468. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.3.457
23.
FosterJ. D.MisraT. A. (2013). It did not mean anything (about me): Cognitive dissonance theory and the cognitive and affective consequences of romantic infidelity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 835–857. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407512472324
24.
FreyD. (1986). Recent research on selective exposure to information. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 41–80). Academic Press.
25.
FreyD.IrleM.MöntmannV.KumpfM.OchsmannR.SauerC. (1982). Cognitive dissonance: Experiments and theory. In IrleM. (Ed.), Studies in decision making (pp. 281–310). de Gruyter.
26.
FrickerJ. (2006). Predicting infidelity: The role of attachment styles, lovestyles, and the investment model [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Swinburne University of Technology.
27.
GroothofH.DijkstraP.BareldsD. (2009). Sex differences in jealousy: The case of Internet infidelity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 1119–1129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509348003
28.
HackathornJ.HarveyR. (2010). Sexual double standards: Bias in perceptions of cyber-infidelity. Sexuality and Culture, 15, 100–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-010-9082-x
29.
Harmon-JonesE. (2001). The role of affect in cognitive-dissonance processes. In ForgasJ. P. (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 237–255). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
30.
Harmon-JonesE.MillsJ. (2019). An introduction to cognitive dissonance theory and an overview of current perspectives on the theory. In Harmon-JonesE. (Ed.), Cognitive dissonance: Reexamining a pivotal theory in psychology (pp. 3–24). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000135-001
HertleinK. M.StevensonA. (2010). The seven “As” contributing to Internet-related intimacy problems: A literature review. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 4(3). https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/4230
33.
HuebnerD. M.NeilandsT. B.RebchookG. M.KegelesS. M. (2011). Sorting through chickens and eggs: A longitudinal examination of the associations between attitudes, norms, and sexual risk behavior. Health Psychology, 30, 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021973
34.
JackmanM. (2015). Understanding the cheating heart: What determines infidelity intentions?Sexuality & Culture, 19(1), 72–84.
KezerM.SeviB.CemalcilarZ.BaruhL. (2016). Age differences in privacy attitudes, literacy and privacy management on Facebook. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 10, article 2. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2016-1-2
37.
LinvilleP. W. (1985). Self-complexity and affective extremity: Don’t put all of your eggs in one cognitive basket. Social Cognition, 3, 94–120. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1985.3.1.94
38.
LinvilleP. W. (1987). Self-complexity as a cognitive buffer against stress-related illness and depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 663–676. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.4.663
39.
MattinglyB. A.LewandowskiG. W.JrMcIntyreK. P. (2014). “You make me a better/worse person”: A two-dimensional model of relationship self-change. Personal Relationships, 21, 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12025
40.
McConnellA. R.RydellR. J.BrownC. M. (2009). On the experience of self-relevant feedback: How self-concept organization influences affective responses and self-evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 695–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.011
41.
McGrathA. (2017). Dealing with dissonance: A review of cognitive dissonance reduction. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11, e12362. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12362
42.
McIntyreK. P.MattinglyB. A.GorbanS. A.CopeM. A. (2020). Implications of relationship-induced self-concept change across partners: An Actor-Partner Interdependence Model approach. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 37, 1554–1562. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407520903799
43.
MessingS.WestwoodS. J. (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 41, 1042–1063. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212466406
44.
MongeauP. A.HaleJ. L.AllesM. (1994). An experimental investigation of accounts of attributions following sexual infidelity. Communication Monographs, 61, 326–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759409376341
45.
ScukaR. F. (2015). A clinician’s guide to helping couples heal from the trauma of infidelity. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 14, 141–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2014.953653
46.
SharpeD. I.WaltersA. S.GorenM. J. (2013). Effect of cheating experience on attitudes toward infidelity. Sexuality & Culture, 17, 643–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-013-9169-2
47.
ShroutM. R.WeigelD. J. (2020). Coping with infidelity: The moderating role of self-esteem. Personality and Individual Differences, 154, 109631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109631
48.
SimonL.GreenbergJ.BrehmJ. (1995). Trivialization: The forgotten mode of dissonance reduction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2), 247 –260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.247
49.
SlotterE. B.GardnerW. L. (2009). Where do you end and I begin? Evidence for anticipatory, motivated self–other integration between relationship partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1137–1151. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013882
50.
SulerJ. (2005). The online disinhibition effect. International Journal of Applied Psychoanalytic Studies, 2, 184–188.
51.
ThompsonA. E.O’SullivanL. F. (2016). Drawing the line: The development of a comprehensive assessment of infidelity judgments. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(8), 910–926.
52.
ThompsonA. E.O’SullivanL. F. (2017). Understanding variations in judgments of infidelity: An application of attribution theory. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39, 262–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2017.1350578
53.
ThompsonA. E.ZimmermanC. N.KulibertD.MooreE. A. (2017). Sex differences and the effect of rival characteristics on adults’ judgments of hypothetical infidelity. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 3, 97–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-016-0076-2
54.
TimmermansE. B. R.De CaluwéE.AlexopoulosC. (2018). Why are you cheating on Tinder? Exploring users’ motives and (dark) personality traits. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 129–139.
VaidisD. C.BranA. (2018). Some prior considerations about dissonance to understand its reduction: Comment on McGrath (2017). Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12411
57.
VargaC. M.GeeC. B.MunroG. (2011). The effects of sample characteristics and experience with infidelity on romantic jealousy. Sex Roles, 65, 854–866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0048-8
58.
VosslerA. (2016). Internet infidelity 10 years on: A critical review of the literature. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families, 24(4), 359–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480716663191
59.
VosslerA.MollerN. P. (2020). Internet affairs: Partners’ perceptions and experiences of Internet infidelity. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 46, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2019.1654577
60.
WalsterE.BerscheidE.BarclayA. (1967). A determinant of preference among modes of dissonance reduction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 211– 216. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024992
61.
WaltherJ. B. (2007). Selective self-presentation in computer-mediated communication: Hyperpersonal dimensions of technology, language, and cognition. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2538–2557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.002
WeiserD. A.NiehuisS.FloraJ.Punyanunt-CarterN. M.AriasV. S.BairdR. H. (2018). Swiping right: Sociosexuality, intentions to engage in infidelity, and infidelity experiences on Tinder. Personality and Individual Differences, 133, 29–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.025
64.
WhatleyM. A. (2012). Attitudes toward infidelity scale. In KnoxD.SchachtC. (Eds.), Choices in relationships: An introduction marriage and the family (11th ed., p. 415). Thompson Wadsworth Publishing.
65.
WhittyM. T. (2003). Pushing the wrong buttons: Men’s and women’s attitudes toward online and offline infidelity. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6, 569–579. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493103322725342
66.
WhittyM. T. (2005). The realness of cybercheating: Men’s and women’s representations of unfaithful Internet relationships. Social Science Computer Review, 23, 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439304271536
YoungK. S.Griffin-ShelleyE.CooperA.O’MaraJ.BuchananJ. (2000). Online infidelity: A new dimension in couple relationships with implications for evaluation and treatment. Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity: Journal of Treatment and Prevention, 7, 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720160008400207
69.
ZannaM. P.AzizaC. (1976). On the interaction of repression-sensitization and attention in resolving cognitive dissonance. Journal Personality, 44, 577– 593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1976.tb00139
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
