Texting plays an increasingly important role in romantic relationships. Along with the increased use and impact of technology in and on relationships, technology provides new approaches to observe and study relationships. This study demonstrates the potential for using unobtrusive measures of texting obtained through mobile data donation for the study of communication behaviors during relationship development. In particular, we examine how texting behaviors change prior to relationship formation and during a relationship transition. Our analysis of 1+ million text messages that 41 college-age romantic couples sent to each other during their first year of dating demonstrates (a) the utility of digital trace data for studying romantic relationship development, (b) the importance of obtaining and analyzing actual texting behaviors when observing interpersonal communication that is frequent, fast, and variable, and (c) the need for more theoretical specificity in how and why different kinds of communication behaviors change as relationships develop.
AckermanR. A.CarsonK. J.CorrettiC. A.EhrenreichS. E.MeterD. J.UnderwoodM. K. (2019). Experiences with warmth in middle childhood predict features of text-message communication in early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 55, 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000636
2.
AvrahamiD.FussellS. R.HudsonS. E. (2008). IM waiting: Timing and responsiveness in semi-synchronous communication. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work—CSCW ‘08, 8–12 November 2008, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/1460563.1460610
BrinkleyD. Y.AckermanR. A.EhrenreichS. E.UnderwoodM. K. (2017). Sending and receiving text messages with sexual content: Relations with early sexual activity and borderline personality features in late adolescence. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.082
5.
CaughlinJ. P.SharabiL. L. (2013). A communicative interdependence perspective of close relationships: The connections between mediated and unmediated interactions matter. Journal of Communication, 63, 873–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12046
6.
ChristensenA.HeaveyC. L. (1993). Gender differences in marital conflict: The demand/withdraw interaction pattern. SAGE.
DogruelL.Schnauber-StockmannA. (2021). What determines instant messaging communication? Examining the impact of person- and situation-level factors on IM responsiveness. Mobile Media & Communication, 9, 210–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920943926
9.
EastwickP. W.KeneskiE.MorganT. A.McDonaldM. A.HuangS. A. (2018). What do short-term and long-term relationships look like? Building the relationship coordination and strategic timing (ReCAST) model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147, 747–781. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000428
10.
EichstaedtJ. C.SchwartzH. A.KernM. L.ParkG.LabartheD. R.MerchantR. M.JhaS.AgrawalM.DziurzynskiL. A.SapM.WeegC.LarsonE. E.UngarL. H.SeligmanM. E. P. (2015). Psychological language on Twitter predicts county-level heart disease mortality. Psychological Science, 26, 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614557867
11.
EichstaedtJ. C.SmithR. J.MerchantR. M.UngarL. H.CrutchleyP.Preoţiuc-PietroD.AschD. A.SchwartzH. A. (2018). Facebook language predicts depression in medical records. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115, 11203–11208. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1802331115
12.
FinkelE. J.EastwickP. W.KarneyB. R.ReisH. T.SprecherS. (2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 3–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612436522
HallJ. A. (2018). When is social media use social interaction? Defining mediated social interaction. New Media & Society, 20, 162–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816660782
15.
HarariG. M. (2020). A process-oriented approach to respecting privacy in the context of mobile phone tracking. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.09.007
16.
HarariG. M.MüllerS. R.StachlC.WangR.WangW.BühnerM.RentfrowP. J.CampbellA. T.GoslingS. D. (2019). Sensing sociability: Individual differences in young adults’ conversation, calling, texting, and app use behaviors in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119, 204–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000245
17.
HaythornthwaiteC. (2005). Social networks and internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication & Society, 8, 125–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180500146185
18.
HustonT. L.SurraC. A.FitzgeraldN. M.CateR. M. (1981). From courtship to marriage: Mate selection as an interpersonal process. In DuckS.GilmourR. (Eds.), Personal relationships 2: Developing personal relationships. Academic Press.
19.
JiangL. C.HancockJ. T. (2013). Absence makes the communication grow fonder: Geographic separation, interpersonal media, and intimacy in dating relationships. Journal of Communication, 63, 556–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12029
20.
LuoS. (2014). Effects of texting on satisfaction in romantic relationships: The role of attachment. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.014
21.
MehlM. R. (2017). The Electronically Activated Recorder (EAR). Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 184–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416680611
22.
MoreyJ. N.GentzlerA. L.CreasyB.OberhauserA. M.WestermanD. (2013). Young adults’ use of communication technology within their romantic relationships and associations with attachment style. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1771–1778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.02.019
23.
OgolskyB. G.SurraC. A. (2014). A comparison of concurrent and retrospective trajectories of commitment to wed. Personal Relationships, 21(4), 620–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12054
24.
OhmeJ.AraujoT.de VreeseC. H.PiotrowskiJ. T. (2021). Mobile data donations: Assessing self-report accuracy and sample biases with the iOS screen time function. Mobile Media & Communication, 9, 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157920959106
25.
PinheiroJ.BatesD.DebRoyS.SarkarD., & R Core Team. (2016). nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-128, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
26.
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
27.
ReevesB.RamN.RobinsonT. N.CummingsJ. J.GilesC. L.PanJ.ChiattiA.ChoM. J.RoehrickK.YangX.GagnejaA.BrinbergM.MuiseD.LuY.LuoM.FitzgeraldA.YeykelisL. (2021). Screenomics: A framework to capture and analyze personal life experiences and the ways that technology shapes them. Human-Computer Interaction, 36, 150–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2019.1578652
RosenfeldM. J.ThomasR. J.HausenS. (2019). Disintermediating your friends: How online dating in the United States displaces other ways of meeting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116, 17753–17758. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1908630116
30.
SchoedelR.AuQ.VölkelS. T.LehmannF.BeckerD.BühnerM.BischlB.HussmannH.StachlC. (2019). Digital footprints of sensation seeking. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 226, 232–245. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000342
31.
SharabiL. L.Dykstra-DeVetteT. A. (2019). From first email to first date: Strategies for initiating relationships in online dating. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36, 3389–3407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407518822780
32.
SlatcherR. B.VazireS.PennebakerJ. W. (2008). Am “I” more important than “we”? Couples’ word use in instant messages. Personal Relationships, 15, 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2008.00207.x
33.
SolomonD. H. (2016). Relational turbulence model. In BergerC. R.RoloffM. E. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication (pp. 1460–1468). Wiley-Blackwell.
34.
SolomonD. H.KnoblochL. K. (2001). Relationship uncertainty, partner interference, and intimacy within dating relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 804–820. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407501186004
35.
SolomonD. H.KnoblochL. K. (2004). A model of relational turbulence: The role of intimacy, relational uncertainty, and interference from partners in appraisals of irritations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 795–816. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407504047838
36.
SolomonD. H.KnoblochL. K.TheissJ. A.McLarenR. M. (2016). Relational turbulence theory: Explaining variation in subjective experiences and communication within romantic relationships. Human Communication Research, 42, 507–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12091
37.
SolomonD. H.VangelistiA. (2014). Relationship development. In SchultzP. J.CobleyP. (Series Eds.) &BergerC. R. (Vol. Ed.), Handbooks of communication science: Vol. 6. Interpersonal communication. (pp. 347–370). de Gruyter Mouton.
38.
SurraC. A. (1985). Courtship types: Variations in interdependence between partners and social networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 357–375. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.2.357
39.
TheissJ. A.SolomonD. H. (2008). Parsing the mechanisms that increase relational intimacy: The effects of uncertainty amount, open communication about uncertainty, and the reduction of uncertainty. Human Communication Research, 34, 625–654. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00335.x
40.
WaltherJ. B.TidwellL. C. (1995). Nonverbal cues in computer-mediated communication, and the effect of chronemics on relational communication. Journal of Organizational Computing, 5, 355–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/10919399509540258
41.
WangX.ZhaoK.StreetN. (2017). Analyzing and predicting user participations in online health communities: A social support perspective. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19, e130. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6834
42.
WickhamH. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag. ISBN 978-3-319-24277-4, https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
