Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2021-7
Perceptions of interpersonal complementarity in late-middle-aged and older adults: The role of interpersonal traits and social context within an intensive ecological momentary assessment framework
Guided by interpersonal theory, this study examined the links between everyday perceptions of interpersonal dynamics, trait-level interpersonal styles, and time-varying social contexts (i.e., with spouses, family, non-family) as they unfold in older people’s everyday life.
Method:
A sample of 78 late-middle-aged and older adults completed 2,739 reports of their social interactions over a one-week period (average 5.02 per day, SD = 2.95). For each report, participants recorded their perceptions of their own agentic and communal behavior, as well as that of their partner.
Results:
Results from multilevel modeling revealed that the complementarity in agentic behaviors was stronger when people were interacting with spouses and family members, whereas such contextual differences were not found to influence the degree of communal complementarity. Individuals with higher level trait agency tended to view their partner as more agentic across interactions with different social partners. Individuals with higher level trait communion tended to view their partner as more communal during interactions; this tendency was more pronounced when interacting with non-family members.
Conclusions:
The differing degrees of perceived complementarity along the dimensions of agency and communion should be understood through varying social contexts. Participants’ trait interpersonal styles tended to affect how they viewed the agentic and communal behaviors of others.
AmbwaniS.RocheM. J.MinnickA. M.PincusA. L. (2015). Negative affect, interpersonal perception, and binge eating behavior: An experience sampling study. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 48(6), 715–726.
2.
BeachS. R.WhitakerD. J.JonesD. J.TesserA. J. P. R. (2001). When does performance feedback prompt complementarity in romantic relationships?Personal Relationships, 8(3), 231–248.
3.
CastroV. L.IsaacowitzD. M. (2018). Aging and the social ecology of everyday interpersonal perception: What is perceived, in whom, and where?The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 74(6), 988–998.
4.
ChiesiF.PrimiC.PigliautileM.BaroniM.ErcolaniS.BoccardiV.RuggieroC.MecocciP. (2018). Is the 15-item geriatric depression scale a fair screening tool? A differential item functioning analysis across gender and age. Psychological Reports, 121(6), 1167–1182.
5.
CundiffJ. M.SmithT. W.ButnerJ.CritchfieldK. L.Nealey-MooreJ. (2015). Affiliation and control in marital interaction: Interpersonal complementarity is present but is not associated with affect or relationship quality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(1), 35–51.
6.
de CraenA. J.HeerenT.GusseklooJ. (2003). Accuracy of the 15-item geriatric depression scale (GDS-15) in a community sample of the oldest old. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18(1), 63–66.
7.
DryerD. C.HorowitzL. M. (1997). When do opposites attract? Interpersonal complementarity versus similarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 592.
8.
EricksonT. M.NewmanM. G.PincusA. L. (2009). Predicting unpredictability: Do measures of interpersonal rigidity/flexibility and distress predict intraindividual variability in social perceptions and behavior?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(5), 893.
9.
FournierM. A.MoskowitzD.ZuroffD. C. (2008). Integrating dispositions, signatures, and the interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(3), 531.
10.
FournierM. A.MoskowitzD.ZuroffD. C. (2009). The Interpersonal signature. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(2), 155–162.
11.
FungH. H.LaiP.NgR. (2001). Age differences in social preferences among Taiwanese and mainland Chinese: The role of perceived time. Psychology & Aging, 16(2), 351.
12.
FungH. H.StoeberF. S.YeungD. Y.-l.LangF. R. (2008). Cultural specificity of socioemotional selectivity: Age differences in social network composition among Germans and Hong Kong Chinese. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 63(3), 156–164.
13.
GuerinJ. M.CopersinoM. L.SchretlenD. J. (2018). Clinical utility of the 15-item geriatric depression scale (GDS-15) for use with young and middle-aged adults. Journal of Affective Disorders, 241, 59–62.
14.
HofmannD. A.GavinM. B. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24(5), 623–641.
15.
HofmansJ.De ClercqB.KuppensP.VerbekeL.WidigerT. A. (2019). Testing the structure and process of personality using ambulatory assessment data: An overview of within-person and person-specific techniques. Psychological Assessment, 31(4), 432.
16.
HorowitzL. M.LockeK. D.MorseM. B.WaikarS. V.DryerD. C.TarnowE.GhannamJ. (1991). Self-derogations and the interpersonal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(1), 68.
17.
KieslerD. J. (1983). The 1982 Interpersonal circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. Psychological Review, 90(3), 185.
18.
LiuH.LouV. W. (2018). Developing a smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment protocol to collect biopsychosocial data with community-dwelling late-middle-aged and older adults. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 9(4), 711–719.
19.
LiuH.XieQ.LouV. W. (2018). Everyday social interactions and intra-individual variability in affect: A systematic review and meta-analysis of ecological momentary assessment studies. Motivation and Emotion, 43(2), 339–353.
20.
LiuH.FangB.LiY.LouV. W. (2021). Initially negative affect predicts lower satisfaction with future social contact: A time-lagged analysis using ecological momentary assessment. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, 76(2), 295–305.
21.
MarkeyP.KurtzJ. E. (2006). Increasing acquaintanceship and complementarity of behavioral styles and personality traits among college roommates. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(7), 907–916.
22.
MongrainM.VetteseL. C.ShusterB.KendalN. (1998). Perceptual biases, affect, and behavior in the relationships of dependents and self-critics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 230.
23.
MoskowitzD.HoM.-h. R.Turcotte-TremblayA.-M. (2007). Contextual influences on interpersonal complementarity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(8), 1051–1063.
24.
MoskowitzD.SuhE. J.DesaulniersJ. (1994). Situational influences on gender differences in agency and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 753.
25.
MoskowitzD.ZuroffD. C. (2005). Assessing interpersonal perceptions using the interpersonal grid. Psychological Assessment, 17(2), 218.
26.
NgoN.IsaacowitzD. M. (2015). Use of context in emotion perception: The role of top-down control, cue type, and perceiver’s age. Emotion, 15(3), 292.
27.
OrfordJ. (1986). The rules of interpersonal complementarity: Does hostility beget hostility and dominance, submission?Psychological Review, 93(3), 365–377.
28.
PocklingtonC.GilbodyS.ManeaL.McMillanD. (2016). The diagnostic accuracy of brief versions of the geriatric depression scale: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 31(8), 837–857.
29.
ProninE.GilovichT.RossL. (2004). Objectivity in the eye of the beholder: Divergent perceptions of bias in self versus others. Psychological Review, 111(3), 781.
30.
PuschS.SchönbrodtF. D.Zygar-HoffmannC.HagemeyerB. (2020). Truth and wishful thinking: How interindividual differences in communal motives manifest in momentary partner perceptions. European Journal of Personality, 34(1), 115–134.
31.
RamN.BroseA.MolenaarP. C. (2013). Dynamic factor analysis: Modeling person-specific process. The Oxford Handbook of Quantitative Methods, 2, 441–457.
32.
RocheM. J.PincusA. L.HydeA. L.ConroyD. E.RamN. (2013). Within-person covariation of agentic and communal perceptions: Implications for interpersonal theory and assessment. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(4), 445–452.
33.
RocheM. J.PincusA. L.RebarA. L.ConroyD. E.RamN. (2014). Enriching psychological assessment using a person-specific analysis of interpersonal processes in daily life. Assessment, 21(5), 515–528.
34.
SadikajG.MoskowitzD.RussellJ. J.ZuroffD. C.ParisJ. (2013). Quarrelsome behavior in borderline personality disorder: Influence of behavioral and affective reactivity to perceptions of others. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122(1), 195.
35.
SadlerP.EthierN.WoodyE. (2011). Interpersonal complementarity. In HorowitzL. M.StrackS. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions (pp. 123–142). John Wiley & Sons.
36.
SadlerP.WoodyE. (2003). Is who you are who you’re talking to? Interpersonal style and complementarily in mixed-sex interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 80.
37.
SchwartzJ. E.StoneA. A. (1998). Strategies for analyzing ecological momentary assessment data. Health Psychology, 17(1), 6.
38.
SchwerdtfegerA.Friedrich-MaiP. (2009). Social interaction moderates the relationship between depressive mood and heart rate variability: Evidence from an ambulatory monitoring study. Health Psychology, 28(4), 501.
39.
SmithT. W.BergC. A.FlorsheimP.UchinoB. N.PearceG.HawkinsM.HenryN. J. M.BeveridgeR. M.SkinnerM. A.Olsen-CernyC. (2009). Conflict and collaboration in middle-aged and older couples: I: Age differences in agency and communion during marital interaction. Psychology and Aging, 24(2), 259–273.
40.
SuhE. J.MoskowitzD.FournierM. A.ZuroffD. C. (2004). Gender and relationships: Influences on agentic and communal behaviors. Personal Relationships, 11(1), 41–60.
41.
TiedensL. Z.JimenezM. C. (2003). Assimilation for affiliation and contrast for control: Complementary self-construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1049.
42.
TiedensL. Z.UnzuetaM. M.YoungM. J. (2007). An unconscious desire for hierarchy? The motivated perception of dominance complementarity in task partners. Journal of Personality Social Psychology, 93(3), 402.
43.
TraceyT. J. (2005). Interpersonal rigidity and complementarity. Journal of Research in Personality, 39(6), 592–614.
44.
TraceyT. J.RyanJ. M.Jaschik-HermanB. (2001). Complementarity of interpersonal circumplex traits. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(7), 786–797.
45.
WagnerC. C.KieslerD. J.SchmidtJ. A. (1995). Assessing the interpersonal transaction cycle: Convergence of action and reaction interpersonal circumplex measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 938.
46.
WangS.RocheM. J.PincusA. L.ConroyD. E.RebarA. L.RamN. (2014). Interpersonal dependency and emotion in everyday life. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 5–12.
47.
YaoQ.MoskowitzD. S. (2015). Trait agreeableness and social status moderate behavioral responsiveness to communal behavior. Journal of Personality, 83(2), 191–201.
48.
ZygarC.HagemeyerB.PuschS.SchönbrodtF. D. (2018). From motive dispositions to states to outcomes: An intensive experience sampling study on communal motivational dynamics in couples. European Journal of Personality, 32(3), 306–324.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
