The decision to marry is complex, often with seemingly innocuous events impacting a partner’s marriage eligibility. Engaging in rituals is one area where couples have the opportunity to see their partners in a new light as well as assess commitment. Although rituals have impactful roles in married couples, there is a dearth of research on ritual activity in dating couples. A qualitative approach was used to explore how rituals act as facilitators or barriers to commitment to wed using data from a random sample of dating couples in a diverse Southwestern region of the U.S. Results showed that celebration and tradition rituals played a contextual role in magnifying the importance of three normative relationship features: family interactions, relationship awareness, and conflict management. Experiencing these relationship features during a ritual time highlighted the uncertainty inherent in determining marriage eligibility with a current partner and enhanced the information gathering process.
BartonA. W.LavnerJ. A.StanleyS. M.JohnsonM. D.RhoadesG. K. (2020). “Will you complete this survey too?” Differences between individual versus dyadic samples in relationship research. Journal of Family Psychology, 34(2), 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000583
2.
BaxterL. A. (1990). Dialectical contradictions in relationship development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407590071004
3.
BergerC. R. (1979). Beyond initial interaction: Uncertainty, understanding, and the development of interpersonal relationships. In GilesH.ClairR. St. (Eds.), Language and social psychology (pp. 122–144). Blackwell.
4.
BergerC. R.BradacJ. J. (1982). Language and social knowledge: Uncertainty in interpersonal relationships. Edward Arnold.
5.
BergerC. R.CalabreseR. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1(2), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.x
6.
BirksM.MillsJ. (2011). Grounded theory: A practical guide. Sage.
BroderickC. B. (1993). Understanding family process: Basics of family systems theory. Sage.
9.
BruessC. J. S.PearsonJ. C. (1997). Interpersonal rituals in marriage and adult friendship. Communication Monographs, 64(1), 25–46.
10.
CampbellK.PonzettiJ. J.Jr (2007). The moderating effects of rituals on commitment in premarital involvements. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 22(4), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681990701496415
11.
CampbellK.SilvaL. C.WrightD. W. (2011). Rituals in unmarried couple relationships: An exploratory study. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 40(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-3934.2011.02087.x
CharmazK. (2014). Constructing grounded theory: A practice guide through qualitative analysis (2nd ed). SAGE.
14.
ClementsM. L.StanleyS. M.MarkmanH. J. (2004). Before they said “I do”: Discriminating among marital outcomes over 13 years. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 613–626. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00041.x
15.
CrespoC.DavideI. N.CostaM. E.FletcherG. J. O. (2008). Family rituals in married couples: Links with attachment, relationship quality, and closeness. Personal Relationships, 15, 191–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2008.00193.x
16.
DenzinN. K. (1970). The Research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Aldine.
17.
FalicovA. (2003). Immigrant family processes. In WalshF. (Ed.), Normal family processes (3rd ed., pp. 280–300). Guilford.
18.
FieseB. H. (1992). Dimensions of family rituals across two generations: Relation to adolescent identity. Family Process, 31(2), 151–162.
19.
FieseB. H. (2006). Family routines and rituals. Yale University Press.
20.
FieseB. H.TomchoT. J. (2001). Finding meaning in religious practices: The relation between religious holiday rituals and marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 15(4), 597–609.
21.
FieseB. H.TomchoT. J.DouglasM.JosephsK.PoltrockS.BakerT. (2002). A review of 50 years of research on naturally occurring family routines and rituals: Cause for celebration?Journal of Family Psychology, 16(4), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1037//0893-3200.16.4.381
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
26.
GoldbergA. E.AllenK. R. (2015). Communicating qualitative research: Some practical guideposts for scholars. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12153
27.
HorowitzJ. A. (1999). Negotiating couplehood: The process of resolving the December dilemma among interfaith couples. Family Process, 38(3), 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1999.00303.x
28.
JohnsonM. P. (1991). Commitment to personal relationships. In JonesW. H.PelmanD. W. (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (pp. 117–143). Jessika Kingsley.
29.
JohnsonM.CaughlinJ.HustonT. (1999). The tripartite nature of marital commitment: Personal, moral, and structural reasons to stay married. Journal of Marriage and Family, 61(1), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.2307/353891
30.
KalmijnM. (2004). Marriage rituals as reinforcers of role transitions: An analysis of weddings in the Netherlands. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 582–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00039.x
31.
KennedyS.RugglesS. (2014). Breaking up is hard to count: The rise of divorce in the United States, 1980–2010. Demography, 51(2), 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-013-0270-9
32.
KnoblochL. K.SolomonD. H. (1999). Measuring the sources and content of relational uncertainty. Communication Studies, 50, 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979909388499
33.
KnoblochL. K.SolomonD. H. (2002). Information seeking beyond initial interaction: Negotiating relational uncertainty within close relationships. Human Communication Research, 28(2), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00806.x
34.
KonstamV.CurranT.Celen-DemirtasS.KarwinS.BryantK.AndrewsB.DuffyR. (2019). Commitment among unmarried emerging adults: Meaning, expectations, and formation of relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(4), 1317–1342.
35.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
MizeL. (1995). Ritual experience and its emergence with story: An experience in meaning. Contemporary Family Therapy, 17, 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02249308
39.
MorryM. M.SucharynaT. A. (2016). Relationship social comparison interpretations and dating relationships. Personal Relationships, 23, 554–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12143
OgolskyB.SurraC. (2014). A comparison of concurrent and retrospective trajectories of commitment to wed. Personal Relationships, 21, 620–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12054
42.
OgolskyB.SurraC.MonkJ. (2016). Pathways of commitment to wed: The development and dissolution of romantic relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78, 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12260
43.
OswaldR. F. (2002). Inclusion and belonging in the family rituals of gay and lesbian people. Journal of Family Psychology, 16(4), 428–436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.16.4.428
44.
ParkB. (1986). A method for studying the development of impressions of real people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 907–917. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.5.907
45.
ParkY.ImpettE. A.MacDonaldG. (2020). Generalizability of results from dyadic data: Participation of one versus two members of a romantic couple is associated with breakup likelihood. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220920167
46.
PearsonJ. C.ChildJ. T.CarmonA. F. (2010). Rituals in committed romantic relationships: The creation and validation of an instrument. Communication Studies, 61, 464–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2010.492339
47.
RusbultC. E. (1980). Commitment and satisfaction in romantic associations: A test of the investment model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 172–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(80)90007-4
48.
SchoebiD.KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (2012). Stability and change in the first 10 years of marriage: Does commitment confer benefits beyond the effects of satisfaction?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 729–742. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026290
49.
StanleyS. M.MarkmanH. J. (1992). Assessing commitment in personal relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 54, 595–608. https://doi.org/10.2307/353245
50.
SurraC. A.BohmanT. (1991). The development of close relationships: A cognitive perspective. In FletcherG. J. O.FinchamF. D. (Eds.), Cognition in close relationships (pp. 281–305). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
51.
SurraC. A.GrayC. E. (2000). A typology of processes of commitment to marriage: Why do partners commit to problematic relationships? In WaiteL. J.BackrachC.HindinM.ThomsonE.ThorntonA. (Eds.), The ties that bind: Perspectives on marriage and cohabitation (pp. 253–280). Aldine de Gruyter.
52.
SurraC. A.HughesD. K. (1997). Commitment processes in accounts of the development of premarital relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 59(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/353658
53.
SurraC. A.HughesD. K.JacquetS. E. (1999). The development of commitment to marriage: A phenomenological approach. In AdamsJ. M.JonesW. H. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal commitment and relationship stability (pp. 125–148). New York: Kluwer.
54.
SuterE. A.BergenK. M.DaasK. L.DurhamW. T. (2006). Lesbian couples’ management of public-private dialectical contradictions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407506064201
55.
TurnerV. (1969). The ritual process. Aldine.
56.
TurnerV. (1974). Dramas, fields, and metaphors: Symbolic action in human society. Cornell University Press.
