The present study tested whether the similarity levels of relationship-oriented values among Chinese couples would be higher than those among randomly matched male–female pairs. Furthermore, we examined whether couple similarity of relationship-oriented values would predict spouses’ marital satisfaction and life satisfaction above the actor and partner effects of relationship-oriented values over time and the potential marriage cohort differences.
Method:
Data were retrieved from the China Family Panel Studies data set in 2010–2014. Our study included a nationally representative sample of 10,860 first-married couples who provided data on relationship-oriented values, marital satisfaction, and life satisfaction.
Results:
The average profile similarity on relationship-oriented values of the real couples was higher than that of the randomly matched male–female pseudo couples. Actor–Partner Interdependence Model analyses showed that (1) couple similarity of relationship-oriented values was positively associated with husbands’ and wives’ life satisfaction indirectly through wives’ marital satisfaction among couples with short to medium marital duration, even after controlling for life satisfaction 4 years ago and a set of sociodemographic variables; (2) husbands’ relationship-oriented values were positively associated with couples’ life satisfaction indirectly through husbands’ marital satisfaction among couples with short to medium and long marital duration.
Conclusion:
With a large dyadic sample of Chinese couples, our findings expand the literature on the significant role of couple similarity of relationship-oriented values in personal and relational well-being.
AndersonC.KeltnerD.JohnO. P. (2003). Emotional convergence between people over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 1054–1068.
2.
ApostolouM.WangY. (2018). Parent–offspring conflict over mating in Chinese families: Comparisons with Greek Cypriot families. Evolutionary Psychology, 16(1), 1–10.
3.
Arránz BeckerO. (2013). Effects of similarity of life goals, values, and personality on relationship satisfaction and stability: Findings from a two-wave panel study. Personal Relationships, 20(3), 443–461.
4.
BadrH. (2004). Coping in marital dyads: A contextual perspective on the role of gender and health. Personal Relationships, 11(2), 197–211.
5.
BaumeisterR. F.LearyM. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.
6.
BeD.WhismanM. A.UebelackerL. A. (2013). Prospective associations between marital adjustment and life satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 20(4), 728–739.
7.
BrimhallA.WamplerK.KimballT. (2008). Learning from the past, altering the future: A tentative theory of the effect of past relationships on couples who remarry. Family Process, 47(3), 373–387.
8.
BurlesonB. R.DentonW. H. (1992). A new look at similarity and attraction in marriage: Similarities in social-cognitive and communication skills as predictors of attraction and satisfaction. Communications Monographs, 59(3), 268–287.
9.
BuunkB. P.MutsaersW. (1999). The nature of the relationship between remarried individuals and former spouses and its impact on marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 13(2), 165–174.
10.
ByrneD. (1961). Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(3), 713–715.
11.
ChenH.LuoS.YueG.XuD.ZhaoyangR. (2009). Do birds of a feather flock together in China?Personal Relationships, 16(2), 167–186.
12.
ChiP.EpsteinN. B.FangX.LamD. O.LiX. (2013). Similarity of relationship standards, couple communication patterns, and marital satisfaction among Chinese couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 27(5), 806–816.
13.
DavisS. N.GreensteinT. N. (2009). Gender ideology: Components, predictors, and consequences. Annual review of Sociology, 35, 87–105.
14.
DealJ. E.WamplerK. S.HalversonC. F.Jr. (1992). The importance of similarity in the marital relationship. Family Process, 31, 369–382.
15.
DuH.KingR. B.ChiP. (2019). Income inequality is detrimental to long-term well-being: A large-scale longitudinal investigation in China. Social Science & Medicine, 232, 120–128.
16.
DyrenforthP. S.KashyD. A.DonnellanM. B.LucasR. E. (2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(4), 690–702.
17.
ElwertF.ChristakisN. A. (2008). The effect of widowhood on mortality by the causes of death of both spouses. American Journal of Public Health, 98(11), 2092–2098.
18.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140.
19.
GarciaR. L.KennyD. A.LedermannT. (2015). Moderation in the actor–partner interdependence model. Personal Relationships, 22(1), 8–29.
20.
GauntR. (2006). Couple similarity and marital satisfaction: Are similar spouses happier?Journal of Personality, 74(5), 1401–1420.
21.
GeorgeD.LuoS.WebbJ.PughJ.MartinezA.FoulstonJ. (2015). Couple similarity on stimulus characteristics and marital satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 126–131.
22.
GonzagaG. C.CamposB.BradburyT. (2007). Similarity, convergence, and relationship satisfaction in dating and married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 34–48.
23.
GuoQ.LiY.YuS. (2017). In-law and mate preferences in Chinese society and the role of traditional cultural values. Evolutionary Psychology, 15(3), 1–11.
24.
HwangK. K. (2000). Chinese relationalism: Theoretical construction and methodological considerations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30(2), 155–178.
25.
JiY. (2015). Between tradition and modernity: “Leftover” women in Shanghai. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(5), 1057–1073.
26.
KashimaY.YamaguchiS.KimU.ChoiS.-C.GelfandM. J.YukiM. (1995). Culture, gender, and self: A perspective from individualism-collectivism research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 925–937.
27.
KashyD. A.KennyD. A. (2000). The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In ReisH.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology (pp. 451–477). Cambridge University Press.
28.
KasserT.RyanR. M.ZaxM.SameroffA. J. (1995). The relations of maternal and social environments to late adolescents’ materialistic and prosocial values. Developmental Psychology, 31(6), 907–914.
29.
KeizerR.KomterA. (2015). Are “equals” happier than “less equals”? A couple analysis of similarity and well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77(4), 954–967.
30.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford.
31.
KlohnenE. C.MendelsohnG. A. (1998). Partner selection for personality characteristics: A couple-centered approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(3), 268–278.
32.
LedermannT.MachoS.KennyD. A. (2011). Assessing mediation in dyadic data using the actor-partner interdependence model. Structural Equation Modeling, 18(4), 595–612.
33.
LeikasS.IlmarinenV.-J.VerkasaloM.VartiainenH.-L.LonnqvistJ.-E. (2018). Relationship satisfaction and similarity of personality traits, personal values, and attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences, 123, 191–198.
34.
LuY. (1964). Correct handling of love, marriage, and family problems. Shan Dong People’s Publishing House.
35.
LuoS. (2009). Partner selection and relationship satisfaction in early dating couples: The role of couple similarity. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(2), 133–138.
36.
LuoS. (2017). Assortative mating and couple similarity: Patterns, mechanisms, and consequences. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(8), e12337.
37.
LuoS.ChenH.YueG.ZhangG.ZhaoyangR.XuD. (2008). Predicting marital satisfaction from self, partner, and couple characteristics: Is it me, you, or us?Journal of Personality, 76(5), 1231–1266.
38.
LuoS.KlohnenE. C. (2005). Assortative mating and marital quality in newlyweds: A couple-centered approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 304–326.
39.
MarkeyP. M.MarkeyC. N. (2007). Romantic ideals, romantic obtainment, and relationship experiences: The complementarity of interpersonal traits among romantic partners. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(4), 517–533.
40.
MursteinB. I. (1970). Stimulus value role: A theory of marital choice. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 465–481.
41.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891.
42.
QianY.SayerL. C. (2016). Division of labor, gender ideology, and marital satisfaction in East Asia. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(2), 383–400.
43.
RoblesT. F.SlatcherR. B.TrombelloJ. M.McGinnM. M. (2014). Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(1), 1–80.
44.
RokeachM. (1973). The nature of human values. Free press.
45.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
46.
SagivL.SchwartzS. H. (2000). Value priorities and subjective well-being: Direct relations and congruity effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(2), 177–198.
47.
SchwartzS. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), 19–45.
48.
SortheixF. M.LönnqvistJ. E. (2015). Person-group value congruence and subjective well-being in students from Argentina, Bulgaria and Finland: The role of interpersonal relationships. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 25(1), 34–48.
49.
StanleyS. M.RaganE. P.RhoadesG. K.MarkmanH. J. (2012). Examining changes in relationship adjustment and life satisfaction in marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 26(1), 165–170.
50.
TanS. J.TambyahS. K.KauA. K. (2006). The influence of value orientations and demographics on quality-of-life perceptions: Evidence from a national survey of Singaporeans. Social Indicators Research, 78(1), 33–59.
51.
TianF. F.DavisD. S. (2019). Reinstating the family: Intergenerational influence on assortative mating in China. Chinese Sociological Review, 51(4), 337–364.
52.
WatsonD.KlohnenE. C.CasillasA.SimmsE. N.HaigJ.BerryD. S. (2004). Match makers and deal breakers: Analyses of assortative mating in newlywed couples. Journal of Personality, 72(5), 1029–1068.
53.
WolfM. (1984). Marriage, family, and the state in contemporary China. Pacific Affairs, 57(2), 213–236.
54.
WuR.LiuZ.GuoQ.CaiM.ZhouJ. (2019). Couple similarity on personality, moral identity and spirituality predict life satisfaction of spouses and their offspring. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(3), 1037–1053.
55.
WuY.StillwellD.SchwartzH. A.KosinskiM. (2017). Birds of a feather do flock together: Behavior-based personality-assessment method reveals personality similarity among couples and friends. Psychological Science, 28(3), 276–284.
56.
XieJ. L.ShiY. W.MaH. Y. (2017). Relationship between similarity in work-family centrality and marital satisfaction among dual-earner couples. Personality and Individual Differences, 113, 103–108.
57.
XieY.HuJ. (2014). An introduction to the China family panel studies (CFPS). Chinese Sociological Review, 47(1), 3–29.
58.
XieY.LuP. (2015). The sampling design of the China family panel studies (CFPS). Chinese Journal of Sociology, 1(4), 471–484.
59.
XuA.XiaY. (2014). The changes in mainland Chinese families during the social transition: A critical analysis. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 45(1), 31–53.
60.
YeW.SarricaM.FortunatiL. (2014). A study on Chinese bulletin board system forums: How internet users contribute to set up the contemporary notions of family and marriage. Information, Communication & Society, 17(7), 889–905.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
