Dyadic profiles of personality among older couples: Associations with marital quality

Abstract

Understanding dyadic personality configurations and their associations with marital quality helps identify couples who are at high risk of marital strain. However, current research on personality similarity among spouses usually confounds couples with similarly positive and similarly negative personalities. This study aimed to (1) provide a clearer classification of dyadic personality profiles among older couples, (2) examine the associations between these profiles and both partners’ marital quality, and (3) explore gender differences in these associations. Data came from 3,178 older couples drawn from the 2010/2012 waves of the Health and Retirement Study. Latent profile analysis was used to identify dyadic personality profiles based on spouses’ standardized Big Five personality scores. Multilevel models examined associations between dyadic personality profiles and each partner’s marital quality, testing for gender differences as well. Six dyadic personality profiles were identified, including two opposite profiles (52%; positive wife–negative husband and positive husband–negative wife), two similar profiles (40%; similarly positive and similarly negative), and two extreme profiles (8%; extremely negative husband and extremely negative wife). Couples in the similarly positive profile reported the best marital quality, whereas couples in the similarly negative profile and the two extreme profiles reported the worst marital quality. The associations between profiles characterized by negative traits and marital quality were more pronounced among wives than husbands. This study advances the understanding of personality similarity and its consequences, suggesting heterogeneous subgroups of dyadic personalities among older couples and providing evidence of gender differences in the implications of personality similarity for relationship quality.

Keywords

Dyadic data analysis gender differences marriage personality

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

J. R.

Van Ryzin

M. J.

Doherty

W. J.

(2010). Developmental trajectories of marital happiness in continuously married individuals: A group-based modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 587–596. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020928

Asparouhov

Muthén

(2008). Multilevel mixture models. In Hancock

G. R.

Samuelsen

K. M.

(Eds.), Advances in latent variable mixture models (pp. 27–51). Information Age Publishing.

Barelds

D. P. H.

(2005). Self and partner personality in intimate relationships. European Journal of Personality, 19, 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.549

Barranti

Carlson

E. N.

Côté

(2017). How to test questions about similarity in personality and social psychology research: Description and empirical demonstration of response surface analysis. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8, 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617698204

Bouchard

Lussier

Sabourin

(1999). Personality and marital adjustment: Utility of the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 651–660. https://doi.org/10.2307/353567

Bulanda

J. R.

(2011). Gender, marital power, and marital quality in later life. Journal of Women and Aging, 23, 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08952841.2011.540481

Carr

Freedman

V. A.

Cornman

J. C.

Schwarz

(2014). Happy marriage, happy life? Marital quality and subjective well-being in later life. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 930–948. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12133

Caspi

Herbener

E. S.

(1990). Continuity and change: Assortative marriage and the consistency of personality in adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 250–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.250

Corra

Carter

S. K.

Carter

J. S.

Knox

(2009). Trends in marital happiness by gender and race, 1973 to 2006. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 1379–1404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X09336214

10.

Czikmantori

Hagemeyer

Engeser

(2018). A dyadic typology of social desires in couples. Journal of Personality, 86, 590–603. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12338

11.

Daljeet

K. N.

Bremner

N. L.

Giammarco

E. A.

Meyer

J. P.

Paunonen

S. V.

(2017). Taking a person-centered approach to personality: A latent-profile analysis of the HEXACO model of personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 70, 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.08.003

12.

DiStefano

Motl

R. W.

(2009). Personality correlates of method effects due to negatively worded items on the Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.10.020

13.

Donnellan

M. B.

Conger

R. D.

Bryant

C. M.

(2004). The Big Five and enduring marriages. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.01.001

14.

Donnellan

M. B.

Robins

R. W.

(2010). Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled personality types: Issues and controversies. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 1070–1083. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00313.x

15.

Duba

J. D.

Hughey

A. W.

Lara

Burke

M. G.

(2012). Areas of marital dissatisfaction among long-term couples. Adultspan Journal, 11, 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0029.2012.00004.x

16.

Dyrenforth

P. S.

Kashy

D. A.

Donnellan

M. B.

Lucas

R. E.

(2010). Predicting relationship and life satisfaction from personality in nationally representative samples from three countries: The relative importance of actor, partner, and similarity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 690–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020385

17.

Eagly

A. H.

Wood

(2012). Social role theory. In Van Lange

P. A. M.

Kruglanski

A. W.

Higgins

E. T.

(Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 458–476). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249222.n49

18.

Gattis

K. S.

Simpson

L. E.

Christensen

Berns

(2004). Birds of a feather or strange birds? Ties among personality dimensions, similarity, and marital quality. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 564–574. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.18.4.564

19.

Hsieh

Hawkley

(2018). Loneliness in the older adult marriage: Associations with dyadic aversion, indifference, and ambivalence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 35, 1319–1339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517712480

20.

Isler

Fletcher

G. J. O.

Liu

J. H.

Sibley

C. G.

(2017). Validation of the four-profile configuration of personality types within the five-factor model. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.058

21.

Iveniuk

Waite

L. J.

Laumann

Mcclintock

M. K.

Tiedt

A. D.

(2014). Marital conflict in older couples: Positivity, personality, and health. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12085

22.

Jackson

J. B.

Miller

R. B.

Oka

Henry

R. G.

(2014). Gender differences in marital satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 105–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12077

23.

Kamp Dush

C. M.

Taylor

M. G.

(2012). Trajectories of marital conflict across the life course: Predictors and interactions with marital happiness trajectories. Journal of Family Issues, 33, 341–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X11409684

24.

Karney

Bradbury

(1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.118.1.3

25.

Kilmann

P. R.

Vendemia

J. M. C.

(2013). Partner discrepancies in distressed marriages. Journal of Social Psychology, 153, 196–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2012.719941

26.

Kinnunen

M. L.

Metsäpelto

R. L.

Feldt

Kokko

Tolvanen

Kinnunen

Leppänen

Pulkkinen

(2012). Personality profiles and health: Longitudinal evidence among Finnish adults. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 53, 512–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00969.x

27.

K. J.

Berg

C. A.

Butner

Uchino

B. N.

Smith

T. W.

(2007). Profiles of successful aging in middle-aged and older adult married couples. Psychology and Aging, 22, 705–718. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.22.4.705

28.

Kulik

(2006). Personality profiles, life satisfaction and gender-role ideology among couples in late adulthood: The Israeli case. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 317–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.06.026

29.

Lachman

M. E.

Weaver

S. L.

(1997). The Midlife development inventory (MIDI) personality scales: Scale construction and scoring. Brandeis University.

30.

Lang

F. R.

Carstensen

L. L.

(2002). Time counts: Future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology and Aging, 17, 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.17.1.125

31.

Luo

Chen

Yue

Zhang

Zhaoyang

(2008). Predicting marital satisfaction from self, partner, and couple characteristics: Is it me, you, or us? Journal of Personality, 76, 1231–1266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00520.x

32.

Luo

Klohnen

E. C.

(2005). Assortative mating and marital quality in newlyweds: A couple-centered approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 304–326. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.304

33.

Margelisch

Schneewind

K. A.

Violette

Perrig-Chiello

(2017). Marital stability, satisfaction and well-being in old age: Variability and continuity in long-term continuously married older persons. Aging and Mental Health, 21, 389–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2015.1102197

34.

McCrae

R. R.

(2008). A note on some measures of profile agreement. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 105–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890701845104

35.

Mund

Finn

Hagemeyer

Neyer

F. J.

(2016). Understanding dynamic transactions between personality traits and partner relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 411–416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416659458

36.

Nemechek

Olson

K. R.

(1999). Five-factor personality similarity and marital adjustment. Social Behavior and Personality, 27, 309–318. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1999.27.3.309

37.

Proulx

C. M.

Helms

H. M.

Buehler

(2007). Marital quality and personal well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 576–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00393.x

38.

Robles

T. F.

Slatcher

R. B.

Trombello

J. M.

McGinn

M. M.

(2014). Marital quality and health: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 140–187. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031859

39.

Rusbult

C. E.

Van Lange

P. A. M.

(2008). Why we need interdependence theory. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 2049–2070. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00147.x

40.

Servais

(2010). Overview of HRS public data files for cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan. https://hrs.isr.umich.edu/sites/default/files/biblio/OverviewofHRSPublicData.pdf

41.

Smith

Ryan

Sonnega

Weir

(2017). Psychosocial and lifestyle questionnaire 2006–2016. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan. https://hrs.isr.umich.edu/sites/default/files/biblio/HRS2006-2016SAQDocumentation_07.06.17.pdf

42.

Specht

Luhmann

Geiser

(2014). On the consistency of personality types across adulthood: Latent profile analyses in two large-scale panel studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 540–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036863

43.

Stokes

J. E.

(2017). Do “his” and “her” marriages influence one another? Contagion in personal assessments of marital quality among older spouses over a four-year span. Social Psychology Quarterly, 80, 204–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0190272517701701

44.

van Scheppingen

M. A.

Chopik

W. J.

Bleidorn

Denissen

J. J. A.

(2019). Longitudinal actor, partner, and similarity effects of personality on well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117, e51–e70. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000211

45.

VanLaningham

Johnson

D. R.

Amato

(2001). Marital happiness, marital duration, and the U-shaped curve: Evidence from a five-wave panel study. Social Forces, 78, 1313–1341.

46.

Wang

Kim

Boerner

(2018). Personality similarity and marital quality among couples in later life. Personal Relationships, 25, 565–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12260

47.

Weidmann

Ledermann

Grob

(2016). The interdependence of personality and satisfaction in couples: A review. European Psychologist, 21, 284–295. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000261

48.

Weidmann

Schönbrodt

F. D.

Ledermann

Grob

(2017). Concurrent and longitudinal dyadic polynomial regression analyses of Big Five traits and relationship satisfaction: Does similarity matter? Journal of Research in Personality, 70, 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2017.04.003

49.

Wood

C. A.

Helms

H. M.

Supple

A. J.

Perlman

(2015). Gender-typed attributes and marital satisfaction among Mexican immigrant couples: A latent profile approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 29, 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000077

50.

Wood

Furr

R. M.

(2016). The correlates of similarity estimates are often misleadingly positive: The nature and scope of the problem, and some solutions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315581119

51.

Yorgason

J. B.

Booth

Johnson

(2008). Health, disability, and marital quality: Is the association different for younger versus older cohorts? Research on Aging, 30, 623–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027508322570

52.

Zhang

Bray

B. C.

Zhang

Lanza

S. T.

(2015). Personality profiles and frequent heavy drinking in young adulthood. Personality and Individual Differences, 80, 18–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.054

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.05 MB