Studies show that young men’s tendency to take risks may be exacerbated or attenuated in different social contexts. Despite widespread evidence that social context influences young men’s risk-taking, few studies have examined the impact of romantic partners on risky decision-making. The present study examined risk-taking among young men in relationships with women (n = 134, ages 18–24) randomly assigned to be tested alone (n = 47), in the presence of their romantic partner (n = 44), or in the presence of an attractive female stranger (n = 43). The presence of a romantic partner diminished young men’s tendency to take risks. Findings demonstrate that a dampening effect on risk-taking is attributable to the romantic partner’s presence and not merely due to knowledge of being in a relationship.
AlbertD.CheinJ.SteinbergL. (2013). Peer influences on adolescent decision-making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 80–86.
2.
AmatoP. R.KaneJ. B. (2011). Life-course pathways and the psychosocial adjustment of young adult women. J Marriage and Family, 73, 279–295.
3.
BakerM. J.ManerJ. K. (2008). Risk-taking as a situationally sensitive male mating strategy. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 391–395.
4.
BakerM. J.ManerJ. K. (2009). Male risk-taking as a context-sensitive signaling device. J Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1136–1139.
5.
BarrA. B.SimonsR. L. (2015). Different dimensions, different mechanisms? Distinguishing relationship status and quality effects on desistance. J Family Psychology, 29, 360–370.
6.
CheinJ.AlbertD.O’BrienL.UckertK.SteinbergL. (2011). Peers increase adolescent risk taking by enhancing activity in the brain’s reward circuitry. Developmental Science, 14, F1–F10.
7.
DuellN.SteinbergL.CheinJ.Al-HassanS. MBacchiniD.LeiC.ChaudharyN.Di GiuntaL.DodgeK. A.FantiK. A.LansfordJ. E.MaloneP. S.OburuP.PastorelliC.SkinnerA. T.SorbringE.TapanyaS.Uribe TiradoL. M.AlampayL. P. (2016). Interaction of reward seeking and self-regulation in the prediction of risk-taking: A cross-national test of the dual systems model. Developmental Psychology, 52, 1593–1605.
8.
DuellN.SteinbergL.IcenogleG.CheinJ.ChaudharyN.Di GiuntaL.DodgeK. A.FantiK. A.LansfordJ. E.OburuP.PastorelliC.SkinnerA. T.SorbringETapanyaSUribe TiradoL. M.AlampayL. P.Al-HassanS. M.TakashH. M. S.BacchiniD.ChangL. (2018). Age patterns in risk taking across the world. J Youth and Adolescence, 47, 1052–1072.
9.
FlemingC. B.WhiteH. R.CatalanoR. F. (2010). Romantic relationships and substance use in early adulthood: An examination of the influences of relationship type, partner substance use, and relationship quality. J Health and Social Behavior, 51, 153–167.
10.
ForrestW.HayC. (2011). Life-course transitions, self-control and desistance from crime. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 11, 487–513.
11.
FrankenhuisW. E.KarrenmansJ. C. (2012). Uncommitted men match their risk taking to female preferences, while committed men do the opposite. J Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 428–431.
12.
GardnerM.SteinbergL. (2005). Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference, and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 41, 625–635.
13.
GiordanoP. C.CernkovichS. A.RudolphJ. L. (2002). Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American J Sociology, 107, 990–1064.
14.
GiordanoP. C.SchroederR. D.CernkovichS. A. (2007). Emotions and crime over the life course: A neo-Meadian perspective on criminal continuity and change. American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1603–1661.
15.
Gudonis-MillerL. C.LewisL.TongY.TuW.AalsmaM. C. (2012). Adolescent romantic couples influence on substance use in young adulthood. J Adolescence, 35, 638–647.
16.
Institute of Medicine & National Research Council. (2011). The science of adolescent risk-taking: Workshop summary. National Academies Press.
17.
Kim-SpoonJ.KahnR.Deater-DeckardC. P.SteinbergL.King-CasasB. (2016). Risky decision making in a laboratory driving task is associated with health risk behaviors during late adolescence but not adulthood. International J Behavioral Development, 40, 58–63.
18.
LydonJ. E. (2010). How to forego forbidden fruit: The regulation of attractive alternatives as a commitment mechanism. Soc Pers Psychol Compass, 4, 635–644.
19.
LydonJ. E.KarremansJ. C. (2015). Relationship regulation in the face of eye candy: A motivated cognition framework for understanding responses to attractive alternatives. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 76–80.
20.
ManerJ. K.RoubyD. A.GonzagaG. C. (2008). Automatic inattention to attractive alternatives: The evolved psychology of relationship maintenance. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 343–349.
21.
MonahanK. C.DmitrievaJ.CauffmanE. (2014). Bad romance: Sex differences in longitudinal associations between romantic relationships and deviant behavior. J Research on Adolescence, 24, 12–26.
22.
OuimetM. C.Simons-MortonB. G.ZadorP. L.LernerN. D.FreedmanM.DuncanG. D.WangJ. (2010). Using the U.S. National Household Travel Survey to estimate the impact of passenger characteristics on young drivers’ relative risk of fatal crash involvement. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42, 689–694.
23.
RonayR.von HippelW. (2010). The presence of an attractive woman elevates testosterone and physical risk taking in young men. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 57–64.
24.
ShulmanE. P.SmithA. R.SilvaK.IcenogleG.DuellN.CheinJ.SteinbergL. (2016). The dual systems model: Review, reappraisal, and reaffirmation. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 103–117.
25.
SilvaK.CheinJ.SteinbergL. (2016). Adolescent in peer groups make more prudent decisions when a slightly older adult is present. Psychological Science, 27, 322–330.
26.
SilvaK.ShulmanE. P.CheinJ.SteinbergL. (2015). Peers increase adolescents’ exploratory behavior and sensitivity to positive and negative feedback. J Research on Adolescence, 26, 696–705.
27.
Simons-MortonB.LernerN.SingerJ. (2005). The observed effect of teenage passenger on the risky driving behavior of teenage drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 37, 973–982.
28.
SmithA. R.CheinJ.SteinbergL. (2014). Peers increase adolescent risk taking even when the probabilities of negative outcomes are known. Developmental Psychology, 50, 1564–1568.
29.
StaffJ.SchulenbergJ. E.MaslowskyJ.BachmanJ. G.O’MalleyP. M.MaggsJ. L.JohnstonL. D. (2010). Substance use changes and social role transitions: Proximal developmental effects on ongoing trajectories from late adolescence through early adulthood. Development and Psychopathology, 22, 917–932.
30.
SteinbergL. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28, 78–106.
31.
TelzerE. H.IchienN. T.QuY. (2015). Mothers know best: Redirecting adolescent reward sensitivity toward safe behavior during risk taking. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10, 1383–1391.
32.
WarrM. (1998). Life course transitions and desistance from crime. Criminology, 36, 183–216.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
