AndersenJ. P.ZouC. (2015). Exclusion of sexual minority couples from research. Health Science Journal, 9, 10–18
2.
BerscheidE. (1999). The greening of relationship science. American Psychologist, 54, 260–266.
3.
BerscheidE.ReisH. T. (1998). Attraction and close relationships. In GilbertS. T. F. D. T.LindzeyG. (Ed.), The handbook of social psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
4.
BlairK. L. (2014). The state of LGBTQ-inclusive research methods in relationship science and how we can do better. Relationship Research News, 13, 7–12.
5.
DeLamaterJ.HydeJ. S. (2004). Conceptual and theoretical issues in studying sexuality in close relationships. In HarveyA. W. J. H.SprecherS. (Ed.), Handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 7–30). New York, NY: Routledge.
6.
DewitteM. (2014). On the interpersonal dynamics of sexuality. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 40, 209–232.
7.
DiamondL. M. (2010a). Toward greater integration of sex research with relationship research: Do we have the right teams, methods, and questions. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality, Las Vegas, NV.
8.
DiamondL. M. (2010b). Where’s the sex in relationship research? Where are the relationships in sex research? Paper presented at the Biennial meeting of the International Association for Relationship Research, Herzliya, Israel.
9.
DiamondL. M. (2013). Where’s the sex in relationship research? In StewartR. S. (Ed.), Let’s talk about sex: Multidisciplinary discussions (pp. 46–66). Sydney, Nova Scotia: Cape Breton University Press.
10.
Holt-LunstadJ.SmithT. B.LaytonJ. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLOS Med, 7, e1000316.
11.
ImpettE. A.MuiseA.PeragineD. (2014). Sexuality in the context of relationships. In TolmanL. D. a. D. (Ed.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 269–316). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
12.
LaumannE. O.PaikA.GlasserD. B.KangJ. H.WangT.LevinsonB.,…GingellC. (2006). A cross-national study of subjective well-being among older women and men: Findings from the global study of sexual attitudes and behaviors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 145–161.
13.
LoewensteinG.KrishnamurtiT.KopsicJ.McDonaldD. (2015). Does increased sexual frequency enhance happiness?Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 116, 206–218.
14.
MuiseA.KimJ. J.McNultyJ. K.ImpettE. A. (2016). The positive implications of sex for relationshps. In ReisC. K. H. (Ed.), Advances in personal relationships, Vol. 1: Positive approaches to optimal relationship development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15.
MuiseA.MaxwellJ.ImpettE. A. (in press). What theories and methods from relationship research can contribute to sex research. Annual Review of Sex Research.
16.
PietromonacoP. R.CollinsN. C. (2017). Interpersonal mechanisms linking close relationships to health. American Psychologist, 72, 531–542.
17.
ReisH. T. (2007). Steps toward the ripening of relationship science. Personal Relationships, 14, 1–23.
18.
ReisH. T.AronA.ClarkM. S.FinkelE. J. (2013). Ellen Berscheid, Elaine Hatfield, and the emergence of relationship science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 558–572.
19.
RoseS. (2000). Heterosexism and the study of women’s romantic and friend relationships. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 315–328.
20.
SchwartzP.YoungL. (2009). Sexual satisfaction in committed relationships. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 6, 1–17.
WiedermanM. W. (2004). Methodological issues studying sexuality in close relationships. In HarveyA. W. J. H.SprecherS. (Ed.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 31–56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
23.
WillettsM. C.SprecherS.BeckF. D. (2004). Overview of sexual practices and attitudes within relational contexts. In HarveyA. W. J. H.SprecherS. (Ed.), The handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 57–85). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.