People tend to be overly optimistic when predicting their future behaviors. This research examines how taking someone else’s perspective affects predictions of relationship behaviors. Study 1 (N = 82) showed that taking the partner’s perspective when predicting how many relationship-enhancing behaviors one might perform over the next week reduced the number of predicted behaviors and consequently reduced optimistic bias. Study 2 (N = 244) replicated the reduction in predicted behaviors when taking the partner’s or a friend’s perspective. Study 2 also showed that predictions from another person’s view are similar to predictions for another person’s behavior. Study 3 (N = 149) replicated the reduction in predicted behaviors and the similarity to predictions for other people’s behavior. Furthermore, Study 3 suggests that one reason why adopting another’s perspective affects predictions is an attenuation of the link between forecasts and relationship quality and increase of the link of forecasts with conscientiousness, which tends to be a better predictor of behavior.
AgnewC. R.LovingT. J.DrigotasS. M. (2001). Substituting the forest for the trees: Social networks and the prediction of romantic relationship state and fate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1042–1057.
2.
AikenL. S.WestS. G.RenoR. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. New York, NY: Sage.
3.
ArmorD. A.TaylorS. E. (1998). Situated optimism: Specific outcome expectancies and self-regulation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 309–379.
4.
ArriagaX. B.RusbultC. E. (1998). Standing in my partner’s shoes: Partner perspective taking and reactions to accommodative dilemmas. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 927–948.
5.
BatsonC. D.EarlyS.SalvaraniG. (1997). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imagining how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 751–758.
6.
BuehlerR.GriffinD.MacDonaldH. (1997). The role of motivated reasoning in optimistic time predictions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(3), 238–247.
7.
BuehlerR.GriffinD.RossM. (1994). Exploring the “planning fallacy”: Why people underestimate their task completion times. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 366–381.
8.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5.
9.
CameronJ. J.RossM.HolmesJ. G. (2002). Loving the one you hurt: Positive effects of recounting a transgression against an intimate partner. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 307–314.
10.
ChandlerJ.ShapiroD. (2016). Conducting clinical research using crowdsourced convenience samples. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 12, 53–81.
11.
ChartrandT. L.BarghJ. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910.
12.
DavisM. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
13.
DavisM. H.ConklinL.SmithA.LuceC. (1996). Effect of perspective taking on the cognitive representation of persons: A merging of self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 713–726.
14.
DavisM. H.OathoutH. A. (1987). Maintenance of satisfaction in romantic relationships: Empathy and relational competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 397–410.
15.
DunningD. (2007). Prediction: The inside view. In KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Social psychology (pp. 69–90). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
16.
EpleyN.DunningD. (2000). Feeling “holier than thou”: Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self-or social prediction?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 861–875.
17.
EpleyN.DunningD. (2006). The mixed blessings of self-knowledge in behavioral prediction: Enhanced discrimination but exacerbated bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 641–655.
18.
FinchamF. D.BradburyT. N. (1993). Marital satisfaction, depression, and attributions: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 442–452.
19.
FletcherG. J.KerrP. S. (2010). Through the eyes of love: Reality and illusion in intimate relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 627–658.
20.
FletcherG. J.SimpsonJ. A.ThomasG. (2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 340–354. doi:10.1177/0146167200265007
21.
FranzoiS. L.DavisM. H.YoungR. D. (1985). The effects of private self-consciousness and perspective taking on satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1584–1594.
22.
GagnéF. M.LydonJ. E. (2004). Bias and accuracy in close relationships: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 322–338.
23.
GalinskyA. D.KuG.WangC. S. (2005). Perspective-taking and self-other overlap: Fostering social bonds and facilitating social coordination. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8, 109–124.
24.
GalinskyA. D.MoskowitzG. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 708–724.
25.
HelzerE. G.DunningD. (2012). Why and when peer prediction is superior to self-prediction: The weight given to future aspiration versus past achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 38–55.
26.
HuiC. M.BondM. H.MoldenD. C. (2012). Why do (n’t) your partner’s efforts at self-improvement make you happy? An implicit theories perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 101–113.
27.
JohnO. P.SrivastavaS. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In PervinL. A.JohnO. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford Press.
28.
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (2000). Attributions in marriage: State or trait? A growth curve analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 295–309.
29.
KammrathL.PeetzJ. (2012). You promised you’d change: How incremental and entity theorists react to a romantic partner’s change attempts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 570–574.
30.
KimmesJ. G.DurtschiJ. A. (2016). Forgiveness in romantic relationships: The roles of attachment, empathy, and attributions. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 42, 645–658.
31.
KimmesJ. G.EdwardsA. B.WetchlerJ. L.BercikJ. (2014). Self and other ratings of dyadic empathy as predictors of relationship satisfaction. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 42, 426–437.
32.
KoehlerD.PoonC. S. K. (2006). Self-predictions overweight strength of current intentions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 517–524.
33.
KrizanZ.WindschitlP. D. (2007). The influence of outcome desirability on optimism. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 95–121.
34.
KrugerJ.GilovichT. (2004). Actions, intentions, and self-assessment: The road to self-enhancement is paved with good intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 328–339.
35.
LongE. C.AndrewsD. W. (1990). Perspective taking as a predictor of marital adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 126–131.
36.
LovingT. J. (2006). Predicting dating relationship fate with insiders’ and outsiders’ perspectives: Who and what is asked matters. Personal Relationships, 13, 349–362.
37.
MacDonaldT. K.RossM. (1999). Assessing the accuracy of predictions about dating relationships: How and why do lovers’ predictions differ from those made by observers?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1417–1429.
38.
MaxwellJ. A.JoelS.PeetzJ.MacDonaldG.BaucomB. (2017). Expectations drive perceptions of how much effort a romantic partner puts into the relationship from week to week. Manuscript in preparation.
39.
McCulloughM. E.RachalK. C.SandageS. J.WorthingtonE. L.JrBrownS. W.HightT. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586–1603.
40.
McCulloughM. E.WorthingtonE. L.Jr.RachalK. C. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321–336.
41.
MettsS. (1994). Relational transgressions. In CupachW. R.SpitzbergB. H. (Eds.), The dark side of interpersonal communication (pp. 217–239). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
42.
MillerD. T.RatnerR. K. (1998). The disparity between the actual and assumed power of self-interest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 53–62.
43.
MillerP. J. E.RempelJ. K. (2004). Trust and partner-enhancing attributions in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 695–705.
44.
Newby-ClarkI. R.RossM.BuehlerR.KoehlerD. J.GriffinD. (2000). People focus on optimistic scenarios and disregard pessimistic scenarios while predicting task completion times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 171–182.
45.
PeetzJ.BuehlerR. (2009). Is there a budget fallacy? The role of savings goals in the prediction of personal spending. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 230–242.
46.
PeetzJ.BuehlerR. (2013). Different goals, different predictions: Accuracy and bias in financial planning for events and time periods. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 1079–1088.
47.
PeetzJ.KammrathL. (2011). Only because I love you: Why people make and why they break promises in romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 887–904.
48.
PeetzJ.KammrathL. (2013). Folk understandings of self-regulation in relationships: Recognizing the importance of self-regulatory ability for others, but not the self. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 712–718.
49.
PinkusR. T.LockwoodP.MarshallT. C.YoonH. M. (2012). Responses to comparisons in romantic relationships: Empathy, shared fate, and contrast. Personal Relationships, 19, 182–201.
50.
RusbultC. E.VeretteJ.WhitneyG. A.SlovikL. F.LipkusI. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 53–78.
51.
SiegertJ. R.StampG. H. (1994). “Our first big fight” as a milestone in the development of close relationships. Communication Monographs, 61, 345–360.
52.
SimpsonJ. A.IckesW.GrichJ. (1999). When accuracy hurts: Reactions of anxious–ambivalent dating partners to a relationship-threatening situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 754–769.
53.
SimpsonJ. A.OrinaM. M.IckesW. (2003). When accuracy hurts, and when it helps: A test of the empathic accuracy model in marital interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 881–893.
54.
TaylorS. E.BrownJ. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210.
55.
Van BovenL.WhiteK.KamadaA.GilovichT. (2003). Intuitions about situational correction in self and others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 249–258.
56.
VorauerJ. D.SucharynaT. A. (2013). Potential negative effects of perspective-taking efforts in the context of close relationships: Increased bias and reduced satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 70–86.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
