Narrative identity is an internal and evolving story about the self. Individual differences in narrative identity have been found to correspond with several important constructs (e.g., well-being, health behaviors). Here, we examined the nature and correlates of participants’ love life narrative identities. In Study 1, participants provided autobiographical narratives from their love lives and rated their personality traits and authenticity within the romantic domain. In Study 2, participants again provided narratives from their love lives and completed measures assessing their attachment tendencies and relationship contingent self-esteem. Narratives were coded for agency, communion, redemptive imagery, contaminated imagery, affective tone, and integrative complexity. Across our studies, the communion and positive tone in participants’ love life narratives was associated with certain traits, authenticity, attachment tendencies, and relationship contingent self-esteem. These results suggest that love life narrative identity represents a promising construct in the study of functioning within the romantic domain.
AdlerJ. M. (2012). Living into the story: Agency and coherence in a longitudinal study of narrative identity development and mental health over the course of psychotherapy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 367–389. doi:10.1037/a0025289
2.
AdlerJ. M.DunlopW. L.FivushR.LilgendahlJ. P.Lodi-SmithJ.McAdamsD. P.SyedM. (2017). Research methods for studying narrative identity: A primer. Social and Personality Psychological Science, 8, 519–527. doi:10.1177/1948550617698202
3.
AdlerJ. M.Lodi-SmithJ.PhillippeF.HouleI. (2016). The incremental validity of narrative identity in predicting psychological well-being: A review of the field and recommendations for the future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 142–175. doi:10.1177/1088868315585068
4.
Baker-BrownG.BallardE. J.BluckS.de VriesB.SuedfeldP.TetlockP. E. (1992). The conceptual/integrative complexity scoring manual. In SmithC. P. (Ed.), Personality and motivation: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 401–418). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
5.
BauerJ. J.McAdamsD. P.SakaedaA. R. (2005). Interpreting the good life: Growth memories in the lives of mature, happy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 203–217. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.1.203
6.
BlockJ. (1963). The equivalence of measures and the correction for attenuation. Psychological Bulletin, 60, 152–156. doi:10.1177/0013164497057005004
7.
BuehlmanK. T.GottmanJ. M.KatzL. F. (1992). How a couple views their past predicts their future: Predicting divorce from an oral history interview. Journal of Family Psychology, 5, 295–318. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.5.3-4.295
8.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
9.
CoxK. S.McAdamsD. P. (2014). Meaning making during high and low point story episodes predicts emotion regulation two years later: How the past informs the future. Journal of Research in Personality, 50, 66–70. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.03.004
10.
DoohanE. M.CarréreS.RiggsM. L. (2010). Using relational stories to predict the trajectory toward marital dissolution: The oral history interview and spousal feelings of flooding, loneliness, and depression. Journal of Family Communication, 10, 57–77. doi:10.1080/15267430903396401
11.
DunlopW. L. (2015). Contextualized personality, beyond traits. European Journal of Personality, 29, 310–325. doi:10.1002/per.1995
12.
DunlopW. L. (2017). The narrative identity structural model (NISM). Imagination, Cognition, & Personality.
13.
DunlopW. L.HanleyG. E.McCoyT. P.HarakeN. (2017). Sticking to the (romantic) script: A examination of love life scripts, stories, and self-reports of normality. Memory, 25, 1444–1454. doi:10.1080/09658211.2017.1316509
14.
DunlopW. L.TracyJ. L. (2013). Sobering stories: Narratives of self-redemption predict behavioral change and improved health among recovering alcoholics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 576–590. doi:10.1037/a0031185
15.
DunlopW. L.WalkerL. J.WiensT. K. (2013). What do we know when we know a person across contexts? The differing relationship between self-concept differentiation and adjustment at the three levels of personality. Journal of Personality, 81, 376–389. doi:10.1111/jopy.12018
16.
EpsteinS. (1983). Aggregation and beyond: Some basic issues on the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality, 51, 360–392. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1983.tb00338.x
17.
FraleyR. C.WallerN. G.BrennanK. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350–365. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.78.2.350
18.
FrimerJ. A.WalkerL. J.LeeB. H.RichesA.DunlopW. L. (2012). Hierarchical integration of agency and communion: A study of influential moral figures. Journal of Personality, 80, 1117–1145. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00764.x
19.
FrostD. M. (2013). The narrative construction of intimacy and affect in relationship stories: Implications for relationship quality, stability, and mental health. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 247–269. doi:10.1177/0265407512454463
20.
GiddensA. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late-modern age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
21.
GuoJ.KlevanM.McAdamsD. P. (2016). Personality traits, ego development, and the redemptive self. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 42, 1551–1563. doi:10.1177/0146167216665093
22.
HolmbergD.OrbuchT. L.VeroffJ. (2004). Thrice told tales: Married couples tell their stories. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
HudsonN. W.FraleyR. C. (2015). Volitional personality trait change: Can people choose to change their personality traits?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 490–507. doi:10.1037/pspp0000021
24.
JohnO. P.NaumannL. P.SotoC. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative big-five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In JohnO. P.RobinsR. W.PervinL. A. (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 114–158). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
25.
KernisM. H.GoldmanB. M. (2006). A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: Theory and research. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 283–357. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38006-9
26.
KneeC. R.CanevelloA.BushA. L.CookA. (2008). Relationship–contingent self-esteem and the ups and downs of romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 608–627. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.3.608
27.
Koenig KellasJ.TreesA. R.SchrodtP.LeClair-UnderbergC.WillerE. K. (2010). Exploring links between well-being and interactional sense-making in married couples’ jointly told stories of stress. Journal of Family Communication, 10, 174–193. doi:10.1080/15267431.2010.489217
28.
McAdamsD. P. (1995). What do we know when we know a person?Journal of Personality, 63, 365–396. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00500.x
29.
McAdamsD. P. (2001). Coding autobiographical episodes for themes of agency and communion. Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
30.
McAdamsD. P.ReynoldsJ.LewisM.PattenA. H.BowmanP. J. (2001). When bad things turn good and good things turn bad: Sequences of redemption and contamination in life narrative and their relation to psychosocial adaptation in midlife adults and in students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 474–485.
31.
McAdamsD. P. (2008). The life story interview. Unpublished manuscript, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
32.
McAdamsD. P. (2013). The psychological self as actor, agent, and author. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 272–295. doi:10.1177/1745691612464657
33.
McAdamsD. P.AnyidohoN. A.BrownC.HuangY. T.KaplanB.MachadoM. A. (2004). Traits and stories: Links between dispositional and narrative features of personality. Journal of Personality, 72, 761–784. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00279.x
34.
McAdamsD. P.BauerJ. J.SakaedaA. R.AnyidohoN. A.MachadoM. A.Magrino-FaillaK.…PalsJ. L. (2006). Continuity and change in the life story: A longitudinal study of autobiographical memories in emerging adulthood. Journal of Personality, 74, 1371–1400. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00412.x
35.
McAdamsD. P.DiamondA.de St. AubinEMansfieldE. (1997). Stories of commitment: The psychosocial construction of generative lives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 678–694. doi:1997-07966-018
36.
McAdamsD. P.HoffmanB. J.DayR.MansfieldE. D. (1996). Themes of agency and communion in significant autobiographical scenes. Journal of Personality, 64, 339–377. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00514.x
37.
McCoyT. P.DunlopW. L. (2016). Contextualizing narrative identity: A consideration of assessment settings. Journal of Research in Personality, 65, 16–21. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2016.08.006
38.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2012). Adult attachment and caregiving: Individual differences in providing a safe haven and secure base to others. In BrownS. L.BrownR. M.PennerL. A. (Eds.), Moving beyond self-interest: Perspectives from evolutionary biology, neuroscience, and the social sciences (pp. 39–52). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
39.
MurrayS.HolmesJ. (1993). Seeing virtues in faults: Negativity and the transformation of interpersonal narratives in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 707–722. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.4.707
40.
MurrayS.HolmesJ. (1999). The (mental) ties that bind: Cognitive structures that predict relationship resilience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1228–1244. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1228
41.
NisbettR. E.WilsonT. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
RobertsB. W.DonahueE. M. (1994). One personality, multiple selves: Integrating personality and social roles. Journal of Personality, 62, 199–218. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994. tb00291.x
44.
SarbinT. R. (2004). The role of imagination in narrative construction. In DaiuteC.LightfootC. (Eds.), Narrative analysis: Studying the development of individuals in society (pp. 5–20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
SchmittD. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 247–311.
46.
SheldonK. M.RyanR. M.RawsthorneL. J.IlardiB. (1997). Trait self and true self: Cross-role variation in the Big-Five personality traits and its relations with psychological authenticity and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1380–1393. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1380
47.
SimpsonJ. A. (1990). Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 971–980. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.971
48.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesS. W.PhillipsD. (1996). Conflict in close relationships: An attachment perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 899–914. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.5.899
49.
SingerJ. A. (2004). Narrative identity and meaning-making across the adult lifespan: An introduction. Journal of Personality, 72, 437–460. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00268.x
50.
SlatcherR. B.VazireS. (2009). Effects of global and contextualized personality on relationship satisfaction. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 624–633. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.012
51.
SuedfeldP.TetlockP. E.StreufertS. (1992). Conceptual/integrative complexity. In SmithC. P. (Ed.), Motivation and personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 393–400). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
52.
WigginsJ. S. (2003). Paradigms of personality assessment. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
