Romantic partners often have differing levels of sexual interest. In these situations, lower desire partners may engage in sex for avoidance goals (e.g., to avoid disappointing their partner), which are associated with negative relational outcomes. An alternative strategy to sustain relationship quality may be to decline a partner’s sexual advances in positive ways. In two experimental studies and a dyadic daily experience study with a longitudinal follow-up, we examined the relationship outcomes of positive rejection compared to avoidance-motivated sex. Across studies, when people engaged in positive rejection, both they and their partner did not experience lower levels of relationship satisfaction compared to when they had sex for avoidance goals, although this was not true for sexual satisfaction. Chronic pursuit of sex for avoidance goals did, however, have detrimental consequences over time, whereas positive rejection helped sustain relationship satisfaction. Results suggest positive rejection behaviors may be a viable alternative to avoidance-motivated sex.
AssadK. K.DonnellanM. B.CongerR. D. (2007). Optimism: An enduring resource for romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 285–297.
2.
BanmenJ.VogelN. A. (1985). The relationship between marital quality and interpersonal sexual communication. Family Therapy, 12, 45–58.
3.
BaumeisterR. F.DhavaleD. (2001). Two sides of romantic rejection. In LearyM. R. (Ed.), Interpersonal rejection (pp. 55–71). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4.
BeachS. R. H.FinchamF. D. (1994). Toward an integrated model of negative affectivity in marriage. In JohnsonS. M.GreenbergL. S. (Eds.), Emotion in marriage and martial therapy (pp. 227–255). New York, NY: Bruner/Mazel.
5.
BlanchflowerD. G.OswaldA. J. (2004). Money, sex, and happiness: An empirical study. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 106, 393–415.
6.
BrezsnyakM.WhismanM. A. (2004). Sexual desire and relationship functioning: The effects of marital satisfaction and power. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 30, 199–217.
7.
ByersE. S.HeinleinL. (1989). Predicting initiations and refusals of sexual activities in married and cohabiting heterosexual couples. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 210–231.
8.
CanaryD. J. (2003) Managing interpersonal conflict: A model of events related to strategic choices. In GreeneJ. O.BurlesonB. R. (Eds.), Handbook of communication and social interaction skills (pp. 515–549). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
CarrereS.GottmanJ. M. (1999). Predicting divorce among newlyweds from the first three minutes of a marital conflict discussion. Family Process, 38, 293–301.
10.
CooperM. L.ShapiroC. M.PowersA. M. (1998). Motivations for sex and risky sexual behavior among adolescents and young adults: A functional perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1528–1558.
11.
CummingG.FinchS. (2005). Inference by eye: Confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. American Psychologist, 60, 170–180.
12.
DowneyG.FeldmanS. I. (1996). Implications of rejection sensitivity for intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1327–1343.
13.
DowneyG.FreitasA. L.MichaelisB.KhouriH. (1998). The self-fulfilling prophecy in close relationships: Rejection sensitivity and rejection by romantic partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 545–560.
14.
EdwardsJ. N.BoothA. (1994). Sexuality, marriage, and well-being: The middle years. In RossiA. S. (Ed.), Sexuality across the life course (pp. 233–299). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15.
ElliotA. J.GableS. L.MapesR. R. (2006). Approach and avoidance motivation in the social domain. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 378–391.
16.
EpsteinN. B.BaucomD. H. (2002). Enhanced cognitive behavioral therapy for couples: A contextual approach. New York, NY: American Psychological Association.
17.
FallisE. E.RehmanU. S.WoodyE. Z.PurdonC. (2016). The longitudinal association of relationship satisfaction and sexual satisfaction in long-term relationships. Journal of Family Psychology, 30, 822–831.
18.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA. G.BuchnerA. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
19.
FletcherG. J.SimpsonJ. A.ThomasG. (2000). The measurement of perceived relationship quality components: A confirmatory factor analytic approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 340–354.
20.
GableS. L.ImpettE. A. (2012). Approach and avoidance motives and close relationships. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 95–108.
21.
GottmanJ.MarkmanH.NotariusC. (1977). The topography of marital conflict: A sequential analysis of verbal and nonverbal behavior. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 461–477.
22.
Haavio-MannilaE.KontulaO. (1997). Correlates of increased sexual satisfaction. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 26, 399–419.
23.
HerbenickD.MullinaxM.MarkK. (2014). Sexual desire discrepancy as a feature, not a bug, of long-term relationships: Women’s self-reported strategies for modulating sexual desire. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11, 2196–2206.
24.
HeymanR. E. (2001). Observation of couple conflicts: Clinical assessment applications, stubborn truths, and shaky foundations. Psychological Assessment, 13, 5–35.
25.
ImpettE. A.GableS. L.PeplauL. A. (2005). Giving up and giving in: The costs and benefits of daily sacrifice in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 327.
26.
ImpettE. A.MuiseA.PeragineD. (2014). Sexuality in the context of relationships. APA Handbook of Sexuality and Psychology, 1, 269–316.
27.
ImpettE. A.MuiseA.RosenN. O. (2015). Is it good to be giving in the bedroom? A prosocial perspective on sexual health and well-being in romantic relationships. Current Sexual Health Reports, 7, 180–190.
28.
ImpettE. A.StrachmanA.FinkelE. J.GableS. L. (2008). Maintaining sexual desire in intimate relationships: The importance of approach goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 808.
29.
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3.
30.
KimJ. J.MuiseA.SakalukJ.ImpettE. A. (2016). The sexual rejection scale: Identifying sexual rejection behaviors and their impact on relationship quality. Paper presented at the International Association for Relationships Research, Toronto, Canada.
31.
KirbyJ. S.BaucomD. H.PetermanM. A. (2005). An investigation of unmet intimacy needs in marital relationships. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 31, 313–325.
32.
LaurenceauJ. P.BolgerN. (2005). Using diary methods to study marital and family processes. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 86.
33.
LawranceK.ByersE. S. (1995). Sexual satisfaction in long-term heterosexual relationships: The interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Personal Relationships, 2, 267–285.
34.
LemayE. P.JrClarkM. S.FeeneyB. C. (2007). Projection of responsiveness to needs and the construction of satisfying communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 834–853.
35.
MaiselN. C.GableS. L.StrachmanA. (2008). Responsive behaviors in good times and in bad. Personal Relationships, 15, 317–338.
36.
MarkmanH. J.RhoadesG. K.StanleyS. M.RaganE. P.WhittonS. W. (2010). The premarital communication roots of marital distress and divorce: The first five years of marriage. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 289.
37.
MaxwellJ. A.MuiseA.MacDonaldG.DayL. C.RosenN. O.ImpettE. A. (2017). How implicit theories of sexuality shape sexual and relationship well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 238–279.
38.
McCoyK.CummingsE. M.DaviesP. T. (2009). Constructive and destructive marital conflict, emotional security and children’s prosocial behavior. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50, 270–279.
39.
MelbyJ. N.GeX.CongerR. D.WarnerT. D. (1995). The importance of task in evaluating positive marital interactions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 981–994.
40.
MettsS.CupachW. R. (1989). The role of communication in human sexuality. In McKinneyK.SprecherS. (Eds.), Human sexuality: The societal and interpersonal context (pp. 139–161). New York, NY: Norwood Ablex.
41.
MuiseA.BergeronS.ImpettE. A.RosenN. O. (2017). The costs and benefits of sexual communal motivation for couples coping with vulvodynia. Health Psychology, 36, 819.
42.
MuiseA.ImpettE. A. (2016). Applying theories of communal motivation to sexuality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10, 455–467.
43.
MuiseA.ImpettE. A.DesmaraisS. (2013). Getting it on versus getting it over with sexual motivation, desire, and satisfaction in intimate bonds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 1320–1332.
44.
MuiseA.SchimmackU.ImpettE. A. (2016). Sexual frequency predicts greater well-being, but more is not always better. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 295–302.
45.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.GriffinD. W. (1996). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 79.
46.
MurrayS. L.RoseP.BellaviaG. M.HolmesJ. G.KuscheA. G. (2002). When rejection stings: How self-esteem constrains relationship-enhancement processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 556.
47.
OverallN. C.HammondM. D. (2013). Biased and accurate: Depressive symptoms and daily perceptions within intimate relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 636–650.
48.
PeplauL. A. (2003). Human sexuality how do men and women differ?Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 37–40.
49.
RehmanU. S.JanssenE.NewhouseS.HeimanJ.Holtzworth-MunroeA.FallisE.RafaeliE. (2011). Marital satisfaction and communication behaviors during sexual and nonsexual conflict discussions in newlywed couples: A pilot study. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 37, 94–103.
50.
RehmanU. S.LizdeckI.FallisE. E.SutherlandS.GoodnightJ. A. (2017). How is sexual communication different from nonsexual communication? A moment-by-moment analysis of discussions between romantic partners. Archives of Sexual Behavior. Advance online publication. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1006-5.
51.
ReisH. T.ClarkM. S.HolmesJ. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In MashekD.AronA. P. (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201–225). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
52.
RischG. S.RileyL. A.LawlerM. G. (2003). Problematic issues in the early years of marriage: Content for premarital education. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 31, 253–269.
53.
RosenthalR.RosnowR. L. (2007). Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
54.
RusbultC. E.BissonnetteV. L.ArriagaX. B.CoxC. L. (1998). Accommodation processes during the early years of marriage. In BradburyT. N. (Ed.), The development course of marital dysfunction (pp. 74–113). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
55.
RusbultC. E.VeretteJ.WhitneyG. A.SlovikL. F.LipkusI. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 53.
56.
RusbultC. E.ZembrodtI. M. (1983). Responses to dissatisfaction in romantic involvements: A multidimensional scaling analysis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 274–293.
57.
SanfordK. (2003). Problem–solving conversations in marriage: Does it matter what topics couples discuss?Personal Relationships, 10, 97–112.
58.
StrachmanA.GableS. L. (2006). What you want (and do not want) affects what you see (and do not see): Avoidance social goals and social events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1446–1458.
59.
WieselquistJ.RusbultC. E.FosterC. A.AgnewC. R. (1999). Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 942.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
