Two studies were conducted to test a conceptual model that expands upon the roles of attribution and forgiveness after a partner’s infidelity by integrating concepts from social network approval and attribution information selection (AIS) to examine how noninvolved partners in dating relationships decide to stay in or leave their relationships. Using a serial mediation model, we examined whether perceived social network approval was indirectly related to noninvolved partners’ relationship decisions sequentially through AIS, attributions, and forgiveness after a hypothetical infidelity (Study 1) and an actual infidelity (Study 2). In Study 1, 198 participants imagined their partners cheated on them and then were randomly assigned into one of two groups for a social network manipulation. In Study 2, 115 participants whose partners had recently engaged in infidelity reported on their experiences. Both studies supported the serial decision-making model, indicating that perceived social network approval, AIS, attributions, and forgiveness serially impact noninvolved partners’ relationship decisions following infidelity.
AbrahamsonI.HussainR.KhanA.SchofieldM. J. (2012). What helps couples rebuild their relationship after infidelity?Journal of Family Issues, 33, 1494–1519. doi:10.1177/0192513X11424257
2.
AfifiW. A.DillowM. R.MorseC. (2004). Examining predictors and consequences of information seeking in close relationships. Personal Relationships, 11, 429–449.
3.
AmatoP. R.PrevitiD. (2003). People’s reasons for divorcing: Gender, social class, the life course, and adjustment. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 602–626.
4.
AtkinsD. C.BaucomD. H.JacobsonN. S. (2001). Understanding infidelity: Correlates in a national random sample. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 735–749. doi:10.1037//0893-3200.15.4.735
5.
BaumeisterR. F. (1996). Self-regulation and ego threat: Motivated cognition, self-deception, and destructive goal setting. In GollwitzerP. M.BarghJ. A. (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 27–47). New York, NY: Guilford.
6.
BradburyT.FinchamF. (1992). Attributions and behavior in marital interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 613–628.
7.
ButlerM. H.RodriguezM.-K. A.RoperS. O.FeinauerL. L. (2010). Infidelity secrets in couple therapy: Therapists’ views on the collision of competing ethics around relationship-relevant secrets. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 17, 82–105. doi:10.1080/10720161003772041
8.
BuunkB. (1984). Jealousy as related to attributions for the partner’s behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 107–112.
9.
DeGenovaM. K.RiceF. P. (2005). Intimate relationships, marriages, and families (6th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
10.
EtcheverryP. E. (2009). Norms about relationships. In ReisH. T.SprecherS. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of human relationships. (Vol. 1., pp. 1165–1168). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
11.
EtcheverryP. E.AgnewC. R. (2004). Subjective norms and the prediction of romantic relationship state and fate. Personal Relationships, 11, 409–428.
12.
FinchamF.BradburyT. (1992). Assessing attributions in marriage: The relationship attribution measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 457–468. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.613
13.
GlassS. P.WrightT. L. (1985). Sex differences in types of extramarital involvement and marital dissatisfaction. Sex Roles, 12, 1101–1119.
14.
GordonK. C.BaucomD. H. (1999). A multitheoretical intervention for promoting recovery from extramarital affairs. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 6, 382–399. doi:10.1093/clipsy.6.4.382
15.
GordonK.BaucomD. (2003). Forgiveness and marriage: Preliminary support for a measure based on a model of recovery from a marital betrayal. American Journal of Family Therapy, 31, 179–199. doi:10.1080/01926180301115
16.
HallJ. H.FinchamF. D. (2006). Relationship dissolution following infidelity: The roles of attributions and forgiveness. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 25, 508–522. doi:10.1521/jscp.2006.25.5.508
17.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
18.
HayesA. F.PreacherK. J.MyersT. A. (2011). Mediation and the estimation of indirect effects in political communication research. In BucyE. P.Lance HolbertR. (Eds.), Sourcebook for political communication research: Methods, measures, and analytical techniques (pp. 434–465). New York, NY: Routledge.
19.
HeiderF. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.
20.
HowardJ.RenfrowD. (2006). Social cognition. In DelamaterJ. (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 259–281). Hoboken, NJ: Springer.
21.
IckesW.DugoshJ. W.SimpsonJ. A.WilsonC. L. (2003). Suspicious minds: The motive to acquire relationship-threatening information. Personal Relationships, 10, 131–148. doi:10.1111/1475-6811.00042
22.
JonesD. N.WeiserD. A. (2014). Differential infidelity patterns among the dark triad. Personality and Individual Differences, 57, 20–24. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.09.007
23.
McCulloughM.WorthingtonE.RachalK. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321–336. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.321
24.
McCulloughM. E.RachalK. C.SandageS. J.WorthingtonE. L.JrBrownS. W.HightT. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 1586–1603. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1586
25.
MoskowitzG. B. (2005). Social cognition: Understanding self and others. New York: Guilford Press.
26.
OlsonM. M.RussellC. S.Higgins-KesslerM.MillerR. B. (2002). Emotional processes following disclosure of an extramarital affair. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 28, 423–434.
27.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
28.
SchützwohlA. (2006). Sex differences in jealousy: Information search and cognitive preoccupation. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 285–292. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2005.06.024
29.
ShackelfordT. K.LeBlancG. J.DrassE. (2000). Emotional reactions to infidelity. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 643–659. doi:10.1080/02699930050117657
30.
ShroutM. R.WeigelD. J. (2017). Infidelity’s aftermath: Appraisals, mental health, and health-compromising behaviors following a partner’s infidelity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. doi:0265407517704091
31.
SimpsonJ. A. (1990). Influence of attachment styles on romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 971–980. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.971
32.
SprecherS.FelmleeD. (2000). Romantic partners’ perceptions of social network attributes with the passage of time and relationship transitions. Personal Relationships, 7, 325–340. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2000.tb00020.x
33.
SprecherS.FelmleeD.OrbuchT. L.WillettsM. C. (2001). Social networks and change in personal relationships. In VangelistiA. L.ReisH. T.FitzpatrickM. A. (Eds.), Stability and change in relationships. Advances in personal relationships (pp. 257–284). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
34.
TashiroT.FrazierP. (2003). “I’ll never be in a relationship like that again”: Personal growth following romantic relationship breakups. Personal Relationships, 10, 113–128. doi:10.1111/1475-6811.00039
35.
TropeY.GauntR. (2007). Attribution and person perception. In HoggM. A.CooperJ. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social psychology (pp. 176–194). London: Sage Publications Inc.
36.
WhismanM. A.DixonA. E.JohnsonB. (1997). Therapists’ perspectives of couple problems and treatment issues in couple therapy. Journal of Family Psychology, 11, 361–366.
37.
ZandbergenD. L.BrownS. G. (2015). Culture and gender differences in romantic jealousy. Personality and Individual Differences, 72, 122–127.
