The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of relationship status (i.e., cohabiting or married), gender, and parental status on perceptions about intimate partner obligations. In vignettes depicting various aspects of couple relationships, we measured the effects of relationship status, gender, and parental status on partner obligations, obtaining quantitative and qualitative data. Married couples were perceived to have greater obligations to one another than cohabitors when issues involved potential relationship transitions. Women were perceived to be more obligated than men to support a partner's career change. Open-ended responses indicated that marriage is an important factor in shaping perceived intimate partner obligations, but love, commitment, and intimacy also are important in motivating relationship-enhancing behaviors.
AbramsD.CahnN.RossC.MeyerD.DriveE. (2006). Contemporary family law. St Paul, MN: West Academic Publishing.
2.
AllanG. (2008). Flexibility, friendship, and family. Personal Relationships, 15, 1–16.
3.
ArnettJ. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
4.
AxinnW. G.BarberJ. S. (1997). Living arrangements and family formation attitudes in early adulthood. Journal of Family Issues, 20, 69–86.
5.
BartleyS. J.BlantonP. W.GilliardJ. L. (2005). Husbands and wives in dual-earner marriages: Decision-making, gender role attitudes, division of household labor, and equity. Marriage and Family Review, 37, 69–94.
6.
BianchiS. M.MilkieM. A. (2010). Work and family research in the first decade of the 21st century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 705–725.
7.
BlumerH. (1969). Symbolic interactionism. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc.
8.
BrinesJ.JoynerK. (1999). The ties that bind: Principles of cohesion in cohabitation and marriage. American Sociological Review, 64, 333–355.
9.
BumpassL.LuH. (2001). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children's family contexts in the United States. Population Studies, 54, 29–41.
10.
CherlinA. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848–861.
11.
ClarkbergM.StolzenbergR. M.WaiteL. J. (1995). Attitudes, values, and entrance into cohabitational versus marital unions. Social Forces, 74, 609–634.
12.
ColemanM.GanongL.KillianT.McDanielA. K. (1999). Child support obligations: Attitudes and rationale. Journal of Family Issues, 20, 46–68.
13.
CoontzS. (2005). Marriage, a history: From obedience to intimacy, or how love conquered marriage. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
14.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
DoucetA. (2001). “You see the need perhaps more clearly than I have”: Exploring gendered processes of domestic responsibility. Journal of Family Issues, 22, 328–357.
16.
FinchJ.MasonJ. (1993). Negotiating family responsibilities. New York, NY: Routledge.
17.
GanongL.ColemanM. (2005). Measuring intergenerational family obligations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1003–1011.
18.
GanongL.ColemanM. (2006). Multiple segment factorial vignette designs. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 455–468.
19.
GanongL. H.ColemanM. (1998). Attitudes regarding filial responsibilities to help elderly divorced parents and stepparents. Journal of Aging Studies, 12, 271–290.
20.
GanongL. H.ColemanM.MistinaD. (1995). Normative beliefs about parents’ and stepparents’ financial obligations to children following divorce and remarriage. Family Relations, 44, 306–315.
21.
GanongL. H.ColemanM.RothrauffT. (2009). Patterns of assistance between adult children and their older parents: Resources, responsibilities, and remarriage. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 161–178.
22.
GersonK. (2010). The unfinished revolution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
23.
HallS.S. (2006). Marital meaning: Exploring young adults’ belief systems about marriage. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 1437–1458.
24.
KiernanK. (2002). The state of European Unions: An analysis of partnership formation and dissolution. In MacuraandM.BeetsG. (Eds.), Dynamics of fertility and partnership in Europe: Insights and lessons from comparative research (pp. 57–76). New York and Geneva: United Nations.
25.
KuperbergA. (2012). Reassessing differences in work and income in cohabitation and marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 688–707.
26.
LauerS.YodanisC. (2010). The deinstitutionalization of marriage revisited: A new institutional approach to marriage. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 2, 58–72.
27.
LundbergS.PollakR. A. (2007). The American family and family economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21, 3–26.
ManningW. D.SmockP. J. (2005). Measuring and modeling cohabitation: New perspectives from qualitative data. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 989–1002.
30.
McAdooH. P. (2002). African American parenting. In BornsteinM. H. (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (pp. 47–58). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
31.
MusickK.BumpassL. (2006). Cohabitation, marriage, and trajectories in well-being and relationships. California Center for Population Research.
32.
NockS. L. (1995). Commitment and dependency in marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 503–514.
33.
NockS. L. (2000). The divorce of marriage and parenthood. Journal of Family Therapy, 22, 245–263.
34.
RossiA. S.RossiP. H. (1990). Of human bonding. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
35.
SasslerS. (2010). Partnering across the life course: Sex, relationships, and mate selection. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 557–575.
36.
SmockP. J. (2000) Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1–20.
37.
SorkhabiN. (2012). Care reasoning in interpersonal relationships: Cognition about moral obligation and personal choice. North American Journal of Psychology, 14, 221–244.
38.
ThompsonL. (1993). Conceptualizing gender in marriage: The case of marital care. Journal of Marriage and Family, 55, 557–569.
39.
ThorntonA.AxinnW. G.XieY. (2007). Marriage and Cohabitation. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
40.
UmbersonD.PudrovskaT.ReczekC. (2010). Parenthood, childlessness, and well-being: A life course perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 612–629.
41.
WaiteL.GallagherM. (2000). The case for marriage. New York, NY: Random House.
42.
WilliamsJ. C. (2001). Unbending gender. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
