Online dating has become an important resource for building intimate relationships. Similarity and group membership have been found to be as important for online and off-line dating. Research on terror management theory has shown that both factors shield against death anxieties, indicating difficulties for dissimilar and intergroup couples. Yet, no study—so far—has investigated both factors simultaneously after mortality salience (MS). To close this gap, the current study presented German participants (N = 249) with a dating app that randomly assigned them to a MS or control condition. Afterward, a candidate following a 2(group membership) × 2(similarity) design was suggested. After MS, in contrast to the control group, similarity increased and dissimilarity decreased the Desire to Date in-group but not out-group members.
ArndtJ.GreenbergJ.CookA. (2002). Mortality salience and the spreading activation of worldview-relevant constructs: Exploring the cognitive architecture of terror management. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 307–324. doi:10.1037//0096-3445.131.3.307
4.
ArndtJ.GreenbergJ.SchimelJ.PyszczynskiT.SolomonS. (2002). To belong or not to belong, that is the question: Terror management and identification with gender and ethnicity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 26–43. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.83.1.26
5.
ArndtJ.RoutledgeC.GoldenbergJ. L. (2006). Predicting proximal health responses to reminders of death: The influence of coping style and health optimism. Psychology & Health, 21, 593–614. doi:10.1080/14768320500537662
6.
BeckerE. (1962). The birth and death of meaning. New York, NY: The Free Press of Glencoe.
7.
BergerC. R.CalabreseR. J. (1975). Some explorations in initial interactions and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99–112. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.x
8.
BlascovichJ.BailensonJ. (2011). Infinite reality: Avatars, eternal life, new worlds and the dawn of the virtual revolution. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
9.
BowlbyJ. (1969). Attachment and loss: Attachment. New York, NY: Basic Books.
10.
BowlbyJ. (1973). Attachment and loss: Separation, anxiety and anger. New York, NY: Basic Books.
11.
BratterJ. L.KingR. B. (2008). “But will it last?”: Marital instability among interracial and same-race couples. Family Relations, 57, 160–171.
12.
BrennanK. A.ClarkC. L.ShaverP. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult romantic attachment: An integrative overview. In SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
13.
BurkeB. L.MartensA.FaucherE. H. (2010). Two decades of terror management theory: A meta-analysis of mortality salience research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 155–195. doi:10.1177/1088868309352321
14.
ByrneD. (1997). An overview (and underview) of research and theory within the attraction paradigm. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 417–431. doi:10.1177/0265407597143008
15.
ByrneD.ErvinC. R.LamberthJ. (1970). Continuity between the experimental study of attraction and real-life computer dating. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 157–165. doi:10.1037/h0029836
16.
ByrneD.GriffittW.HudginsW.ReevesacK. (1969). Attitude similarity–dissimilarity and attraction: Generality beyond the college sophomore. The Journal of Social Psychology, 79, 155–161. doi:10.1080/00224545.1969.9922403
17.
ByrneD.NelsonD. (1965). Attraction as a linear function of proportion of positive reinforcement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 659–663. doi:10.1037/h0022073
18.
CastanoE. (2004). In case of death, cling to the ingroup. European Journal of Social Psychology, 384, 375–384. doi:10.1002/ejsp.211
19.
CastanoE.YzerbytV.PaladinoP. M. (2004). Transcending oneself through social identification. In GreenbergJ.KooleS.PyszczynskiT. (Eds.), Experimental existential psychology (pp. 305–321). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
20.
CastanoE.YzerbytV.PaladinoM. P.SacchiS. (2002). I belong, therefore, I exist: Ingroup identification, ingroup entitativity, and ingroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 135–143. doi:10.1177/0146167202282001
21.
ColeH.GriffithsM. (2007). Social interactions in massively multiplayer online role-playing gamers. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 10, 575–583. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.9988
22.
CoxC. R.ArndtJ.PyszczynskiT.GreenbergJ.AbdollahiA.SolomonS. (2008). Terror management and adults’ attachment to their parents: The safe haven remains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 696–717. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.696
23.
DechesneM.JanssenJ.van KnippenbergA. (2000). Derogation and distancing as terror management strategies: The moderating role of need for closure and permeability of group boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 923–932. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.79.6.923
24.
DiamondL. M. (2004). Emerging perspectives on distinctions between romantic love and sexual desire. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 116–119. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00287.x
25.
FazioR. H.OlsonM. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225
26.
FeinS.SpencerS. J. (1997). Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 31–44. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.73.1.31
27.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140. doi:10.1177/001872675400700202
28.
FieldA. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
29.
FinkelE. J.EastwickP. W.KarneyB. R.ReisH. T.SprecherS. (2012). Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 3–66. doi:10.1177/1529100612436522
30.
FrieseM.HofmannW. (2008). What would you have as a last supper? Thoughts about death influence evaluation and consumption of food products. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 1388–1394. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.06.003
31.
FrischlichL.KlusacekC. (2013). I push my seed and I push the life: Gender differences in the implicit association of sex and love after mortality salience. Poster presented at the 55th TeaP (Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen). Vienna, Austria.
32.
FritscheI.FischerP.KoranyiN.BergerN.FleischmannB. (2007). Mortality salience and the desire for offspring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 753–762. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.003
33.
GailliotM. T.SchmeichelB. J.BaumeisterR. F. (2006). Self-regulatory processes defend against the threat of death: Effects of self-control depletion and trait self-control on thoughts and fears of dying. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 49–62. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.1.49
34.
GreenbergJ.MartensA.JonasE.EisenstadtD.PyszczynskiT.SolomonS. (2003). Psychological defense in anticipation of anxiety: Eliminating the potential for anxiety eliminates the effect of mortality salience on worldview defense. Psychological Science, 14, 516–519. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.03454
35.
GreenbergJ.PyszczynskiT.SolomonS. (1986). The causes and consequences of a need for self-esteem: A terror management theory. In BaumeisterR. F. (Ed.), Public self and private self (pp. 189–212). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
36.
GreenbergJ.PyszczynskiT.SolomonS.RosenblattA.VeederM.KirklandS. (1990). Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 308–318. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.308
37.
GreenbergJ.PyszczynskiT.SolomonS.SimonL.BreusM. (1994). Role of consciousness and accessibility of death-related thoughts in mortality salience effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 627–637. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.627
38.
GreenbergJ.SimonL.Harmon-JonesE.SolomonS.PyszczynskiT.LyonD. (1995). Testing alternative explanations for mortality salience effects: Terror management, value accessibility, or worrisome thoughts?European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 417–433. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420250406
39.
HansenJ.WinzelerS.TopolinskiS. (2010). When the death makes you smoke: A terror management perspective on the effectiveness of cigarette on-pack warnings. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 226–228. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.09.007
40.
Harmon-JonesE.GreenbergJ.SolomonS.SimonL. (1996). The effects of mortality salience on intergroup bias between minimal groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 677–681.
41.
HarrisT. M.KalbfleischP. J. (2000). Interracial dating: The implications of race for initiating a romantic relationship. Howard Journal of Communications, 11, 49–64. doi:10.1080/106461700246715
42.
HayesJ.SchimelJ.ArndtJ.FaucherE. H. (2010). A theoretical and empirical review of the death-thought accessibility concept in terror management research. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 699–739. doi:10.1037/a0020524
43.
HenryE.BartholowB. D.ArndtJ. (2010). Death on the brain: Effects of mortality salience on the neural correlates of ingroup and outgroup categorization. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 5, 77–87. doi:10.1093/scan/nsp041
44.
HirschbergerG.FlorianV.MikulincerM. (2002). The anxiety buffering function of close relationships: Mortality salience effects on the readiness to compromise mate selection standards. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 609–625. doi:10.1002/ejsp.110
45.
HirschbergerG.FlorianV.MikulincerM. (2003). Strivings for romantic intimacy following partner complaint or partner criticism: A terror management perspective. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 20, 675–687. doi:10.1177/02654075030205006
46.
HitschG. J.HortaçsuA.ArielyD. (2006). What makes you click? Mate preferences and matching outcomes in online dating. MIT Sloan Working Paper 4603-06. Chicago, IL: MIT Sloan School of Management. Retrieved August 28, 2013, fromhttp://ssrn.com/abstract=895442
47.
JonasE.MartensA.KayserD. N.FritscheI.SullivanD.GreenbergJ. (2008). Focus theory of normative conduct and terror-management theory: The interactive impact of mortality salience and norm salience on social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1239–1251. doi:10.1037/a0013593
48.
JonasE.SchimelJ.GreenbergJ.PyszczynskiT. (2002). The scrooge effect: Evidence that mortality salience increases prosocial attitudes and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1342–1353. doi:10.1177/014616702236834
49.
KosloffS.GreenbergJ.SullivanD.WeiseD. (2010). Of trophies and pillars: Exploring the terror management functions of short-term and long-term relationship partners. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1037–1051. doi:10.1177/0146167210374602
50.
KrämerK.BenteG.LuoS.PfeifferU. J.HanS.VogeleyK. (2013). Influence of ethnic group-membership and gaze direction on the perception of emotions: A cross-cultural study between Germany and China. PLoS One, 8, e66335. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066335
51.
LandauM. J.GreenbergJ.SullivanD. (2009). Managing terror when self-worth and worldviews collide: Evidence that mortality salience increases reluctance to self-enhance beyond authorities. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 68–79. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.007
52.
LeyensJ. P.YzerbytV. Y. (1992). The ingroup overexclusion effect: Impact of valence and confirmation on stereotypical informations search. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 549–569. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420220604
53.
McGregorI. (2006). Offensive defensiveness: Toward an integrative neuroscience of compensatory zeal after mortality salience, personal uncertainty, and other poignant self-threats. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 299–308. doi:10.1080/10478400701366977
54.
McGregorI.ZannaM. P.HolmesJ. G.SpencerS. J. (2001). Compensatory conviction in the face of personal uncertainty: Going to extremes and being oneself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 472–488. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.472
55.
McphersonM.Smith-LovinL.CookJ. M. (2012). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
56.
MichinovE.MichinovN. (2011). The effects of group membership on the similarity-attraction relationship. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 754–766.
57.
MikulincerM.FlorianV. (2000). Exploring individual differences in reactions to mortality salience: Does attachment style regulate terror management mechanisms?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 260–273. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.2.260
58.
MikulincerM.FlorianV.BirnbaumG.MalishkevichS. (2002). The death-anxiety buffering function of close relationships: Exploring the effects of separation reminders on death-thought accessibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 287–299. doi:10.1177/0146167202286001
59.
MikulincerM.FlorianV.HirschbergerG. (2003). The existential function of close relationships: Introducing death into the science of love. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 20–40. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0701
60.
MikulincerM.FlorianV.HirschbergerG. (2004). The terror of death and the quest for love: An existential perspective on close relationships. In GreenbergJ.KooleS.PyszczynskiT. (Eds.), Experimental existential psychology (pp. 287–304). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
61.
MikulincerM.FlorianV.TolmaczR. (1990). Attachment styles and fear of personal death: A case study of affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 273–280. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.273
62.
MoninM. M. (2009). Mortality salience and smokers reactions to anti-smoking messages. Duquesne University, Pittsburgh.
63.
MontepareJ. M.OpeyoA. (2002). The relative salience of physiognomic cues in differentiating faces: A methodological tool. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 26, 43–59.
64.
MontoyaR. M.HortonR. S. (2012). A meta-analytic investigation of the processes underlying the similarity-attraction effect. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 64–94. doi:10.1177/0265407512452989
65.
MontoyaR. M.HortonR. S.KirchnerJ. (2008). Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 889–922. doi:10.1177/0265407508096700
66.
PetzelT.WagnerU.NicolaiK.Van DickR. (1997). Ein kurzes instrument zur messung der autoritarismus-neigung [A short instrument for measuring authoritarianism]. Gruppendynamik, 28, 251–258.
67.
PinelE. C.LongA. E. (2012). When I’s meet: Sharing subjective experience with someone from the outgroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 296–307. doi:10.1177/0146167211433878
68.
PinelE. C.LongA. E.LandauM. J.AlexanderK.PyszczynskiT. (2006). Seeing I to I: A pathway to interpersonal connectedness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 243–257. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.243
69.
PotterT.CorneilleO. (2008). Locating attractiveness in the face space: Faces are more attractive when closer to their group prototype. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 615–622. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.3.615
70.
PoulsenF. O.HolmanT. B.BusbyD. M.CarrollJ. S. (2012). Physical attraction, attachment styles, and dating development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30, 301–319. doi:10.1177/0265407512456673
71.
PurifoyF. E.GrodskyA.GiambraL. M. (1992). The relationship of sexual daydreaming to sexual activity, sexual drive, and sexual attitudes for women across the life-span. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 21, 369–385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01542026
72.
PyszczynskiT.GreenbergJ.KooleS.SolomonS. (2009). Experimental existential psychology: Coping with the facts of life. In GilbertD. T.FiskeS. T. (Eds.). Handbook of social psychology (pp. 720–825). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001020
73.
PyszczynskiT.GreenbergJ.SolomonS. (1997). Why do we need what we need? A terror management perspective on the roots of human social motivation. Psychological Inquiry, 8, 1–20. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0801_1
74.
PyszczynskiT.GreenbergJ.SolomonS. (1999). A dual-process model of defense against conscious and unconscious death-related thoughts: An extension of terror management theory. Psychological Review, 106, 835–845. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.106.4.835
75.
PyszczynskiT.GreenbergJ.SolomonS.ArndtJ.SchimelJ. (2004). Why do people need self-esteem? A theoretical and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 435–468. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.435
76.
PyszczynskiT.WicklundR. A.FloreskuS.KochH.GauchG.SolomonS.GreenbergJ. (1996). Whisteling in the dark: Exaggerated consensus estimates in response to incidental reminders of mortality. Psychological Science, 7, 332–337. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00384.x
77.
ReisH. T.McdougalI.MonestereC.BernsteinS.ClarkK.SeidlE.,…RadoaneK. (1990). What is smiling is beautiful and good. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 259–267.
78.
ReynoldsK. J.TurnerJ. C.HaslamS. A.RyanM. K. (2001). The role of personality and group factors in explaining prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 427–434. doi:10.1006/jesp.2000.1473
79.
RosenbergM. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
80.
RosenblattA.GreenbergJ.SolomonS.PyszczynskiT.LyonD. (1989). Evidence for terror management theory: I. The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who violate or uphold cultural values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 681–690. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.57.4.681
81.
RoutledgeC.ArndtJ.GoldenbergJ. L. (2004). A time to tan: Proximal and distal effects of mortality salience on sun exposure intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1347–1358. doi:10.1177/0146167204264056
82.
SteeleC. M.SpencerS. J.LynchM. (1993). Self-image resilience and dissonance: The role of affirmational resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 885–896. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.64.6.885
83.
StrachmanA.SchimelJ. (2006). Terror management and close relationships: Evidence that mortality salience reduces commitment among partners with different worldviews. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 965–978. doi:10.1177/0265407506070477
84.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In WorchelS.AustinW. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
85.
Taubman-Ben-AriO.FindlerL.MikulincerM. (2002). The effects of mortality salience on relationship strivings and beliefs: The moderating role of attachment style. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 419–441.
86.
Taubman-Ben-AriO.FlorianV.MikulincerM. (2000). Does a threat appeal moderate reckless driving? A terror management theory perspective. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 32, 1–10.
87.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
88.
WangH.KaoG.JoynerK. (2006). Stability of interracial and intraracial romantic relationships among adolescents. Social Science Research, 35, 435–453. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2004.10.001
89.
WismanA.KooleS. L. (2003). Hiding in the crowd: Can mortality salience promote affiliation with others who oppose one’s worldviews?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 511–526. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.511
