How people interpret the meaning of minor relationship transgressions can impact broader relationship well-being. It is proposed that picturing relationship transgressions from a third-person (vs. first-person) visual perspective prompts people to think of them in the context of their chronic relationship beliefs and goals. In doing so, individuals who are relatively anxious about their relationships become more insecure, whereas less anxious individuals find reassurance. In Study 1 participants pictured a transgression they committed against their partner. Individuals high in attachment anxiety made less positive evaluations of their relationships when picturing the event using a third-person rather than first-person perspective. Similar results were found when participants recalled transgressions committed by their partners against them (Study 2). These results have implications for understanding how partners move forward in their relationships after transgressions.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
AydukO.KrossE. (2008). Enhancing the pace of recovery: Self-distanced analysis of negative experiences reduces blood pressure reactivity. Psychological Science, 19, 229–231.
3.
BaldwinM. W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 461–484.
4.
BaldwinM. W.HolmesJ. G. (1987). Salient private audiences and awareness of the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1087–1098.
5.
Ben-NaimS.HirschbergerG.Ein-DorT.MikulincerM. (2013). Experimental study of emotion regulation during relationship conflict interactions: The moderating role of attachment orientations. Emotion, 13, 506–519.
6.
BrennanK. A.ClarkC. L.ShaverP. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S. (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
7.
CameronJ. J.RossM.HolmesJ. G. (2002). Loving the one you hurt: Positive effects of recounting a transgression against an intimate partner. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 307–314.
8.
CampbellL.MarshallT. (2011). Anxious attachment and relationship processes: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Personality, 79, 917–947.
9.
CampbellL.SimpsonJ.A.BoldryJ.KashyD.A. (2005). Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: The role of attachment anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 510–531.
10.
ColesM. E.TurkC. L.HeimbergR. G. (2002). The role of memory perspective in social phobia: Immediate and delayed memories for role-played situations. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 30, 415–425.
11.
CollinsN. L. (1996). Working models of attachment: Implications for explanation, emotion, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 810–832.
12.
CollinsN. L.FordM. B.GuichardA. C.AllardL. M. (2006). Working models of attachment and attribution processes in intimate relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 201–219.
13.
CollinsN. L.ReadS. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 644–663.
14.
FeeneyJ. A. (2004). Hurt feelings in couple relationships: Towards integrative models of the negative effects of hurtful events. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 487–508.
15.
FinkelE. J.SlotterE. B.LuchiesL. B.WaltonG. M.GrossJ. J. (2013). A brief intervention to promote conflict reappraisal preserves marital quality over time. Psychological Science, 24, 1595–1601.
16.
FraleyR. C.ShaverP. R. (2000). Adult romantic attachment: Theoretical developments, emerging controversies, and unanswered questions. Review of General Psychology, 4, 132–154.
17.
FrankM. G.GilovichT. (1989). Effect of memory perspective on retrospective causal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 399–403.
18.
HolmesJ. G.CameronJ. J. (2005). An integrative review of theories of interpersonal cognition: An interdependence theory perspective. In BaldwinM. W. (Ed.), Interpersonal cognition (pp. 415–447). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
19.
KarneyB. (2013). Learning from couples who are not middle-class, college educated, and white. Paper presented in the Society for Experimental Social Psychology Attraction and Relationships Preconference, September 26, 2013, Berkeley, CA.
20.
KlohnenE. C.WellerJ.LuoS.ChoeM. (2005). Organization and predictive power of general and relationship-specific attachment models: One for all, and all for one?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1665–1682.
21.
KrossE.AydukO. (2011). Making meaning out of negative experiences by self-distancing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 187–191.
22.
KrossE.AydukO.MischelW. (2005). When asking “why” does not hurt: Distinguishing rumination from reflective processing of negative emotions. Psychological Science, 16, 709–715.
23.
La GuardiaJ. G.RyanR. M.CouchmanC. E.DeciE. L. (2000). Within-person variation in security of attachment: A self-determination theory perspective on attachment, need fulfillment, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 367–384.
24.
LibbyL. K.EibachR. P. (2002). Looking back in time: Self-concept change affects visual perspective in autobiographical memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 167–179.
25.
LibbyL. K.EibachR. P. (2011a). Visual perspective in mental imagery: A representational tool that functions in judgment, emotion, and self-insight. In ZannaM. P.OlsonJ. M. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 44, pp. 185–245). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
26.
LibbyL. K.EibachR. P. (2011b). Self-enhancement or self-coherence? Why people shift visual perspective in mental images of the personal past and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 714–726.
27.
LibbyL. K.EibachR. P.GilovichT. (2005). Here's looking at me: The effect of memory perspective on assessments of personal change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 50–62.
28.
LibbyL. K.ValentiG.PfentA.EibachR. P. (2011). Seeing failure in your life: Imagery perspective determines whether self-esteem shapes reactions to recalled and imagined failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1157–1173.
29.
LibbyL. K.ShaefferE. M.EibachR. P. (2009). Seeing meaning in action: A bidirectional link between visual perspective and action identification level. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 503–516.
30.
LibbyL. K.ValentiG.HinesK.EibachR. P. (2014). Using imagery perspective to access two distinct forms of self-knowledge: Associative evaluations versus propositional self-beliefs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 492–497.
31.
MagaiC. (1999). Affect, imagery, and attachment: Working models of interpersonal affect and the socialization of emotion. In CassidyJ.ShaverP. (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 290–312). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
32.
MainM. (1991). Metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive monitoring, and singular (coherent) vs. multiple (incoherent) model of attachment. In ParkesC. M.Stevenson-HindeJ.MarrisP. (Eds.), Attachment across the lifecourse, (pp. 127–159). New York, NY: Routledge.
33.
MarigoldD. C.HolmesJ.G.RossM. (2007). More than words: Reframing compliments from romantic partners fosters security in low self-esteem individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 232–248.
34.
MikulincerM. (1998). Adult attachment style and individual differences in functional versus dysfunctional experiences of anger. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 513–524.
35.
MikulincerM.OrbachI. (1995). Attachment styles and repressive defensiveness: The accessibility and architecture of affective memories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 917–925.
36.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2003). The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. In ZannaM.P., (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. (Vol 35, pp. 53–152). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
37.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (2005). Attachment theory and emotions in close relationships: Exploring the attachment-related dynamics of emotional reactions to relational events. Personal Relationships, 12, 149–168.
38.
MikulincerM.ShaverP.R.Sapir-LavidY.Avihou-KanzaN. (2009).What’s inside the minds of securely and insecurely attached people? The secure-base script and its associations with attachment-style dimensions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 615–633.
39.
MurrayS. L.GriffinD. W.RoseP.BellaviaG. M. (2003). Calibrating the sociometer: The relational contingencies of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 63–84.
40.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.CollinsN. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 641–666.
41.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.GriffinD. W. (1996). The benefits of positive illusions: Idealization and the construction of satisfaction in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 79–98.
42.
MurrayS. L.RoseP.BellaviaG.HolmesJ. G.KuscheA. G. (2002). When rejection stings: How self-esteem constrains relationship-enhancement processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 556–573.
43.
NigroG.NeisserU. (1983). Point of view in personal memories. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 467–482.
44.
PierceT.LydonJ. E. (2001). Global and specific relational models in the experience of social interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 613–631.
45.
PowersS. I.PietromonacoP. R.GunlicksM.SayerA. (2006).Dating couples' attachment styles and patterns of cortisol reactivity and recovery in response to a relationship conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 613–628.
46.
RobinsonJ. A.SwansonK. L. (1993). Field and observer modes of remembering. Memory, 1, 169–184.
47.
ShaverP.R.MikulinerM.LavyS.CassidyJ. (2009). Understanding and altering hurt feelings: An attachment-theoretical perspective on the generation and regulation of emotions. In VangelistiA. L. (Ed.), Feeling hurt in close relationships. Advances in personal relationships (pp. 92–119). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
48.
SimpsonJ. A.RholesW. S.PhillipsD. (1996). Conflict in close relationships: An attachment perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 899–914.
49.
StormsM. D. (1973). Videotape and the attribution process: Reversing actors' and observers' points of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 165–175.
50.
ValentiG.LibbyL. K.EibachR. P. (2011). Looking back with regret: Visual perspective in memory images differentially impacts regret for actions and inactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 730–737.
51.
Van OrdenK. A.JoinerT. E.Jr (2006). The inner and outer turmoil of excessive reassurance seeking: From self-doubts to social rejection. In VohsK. D.FinkelE. J. (Eds.), Self and relationships: Connecting interpersonal and intrapersonal processes (pp. 104–129). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
52.
VasquezN.BuehlerR. (2007). Seeing future success: Does imagery perspective influence achievement motivation?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1392–1405.
