Compassionate love (CL) is a form of altruistic, caring love that emphasizes concern for the other’s well-being. How is CL expressed in marriage? To address this question, we adopted a behavioral acts perspective in which we examined among newlyweds the presence or absence of a series of behavioral manifestations of CL. A sample of 175 newlywed couples completed daily diaries for 2 weeks, describing their own compassionate acts and their perceptions of their partners’ compassionate acts. We found clear evidence that CL acts contributed to both spouses’ daily marital satisfaction. These effects were independent of general positivity or negativity of behavior. We also employed a quasi-signal detection analysis to determine whether acts that both partners recognize as compassionate are more influential than acts that only one of them acknowledges. This hypothesis was supported. Our findings indicate that CL-related behavior represents a beneficial form of caring interaction that merits further attention in relationship research.
AlgoeS. B.HaidtJ.GableS. L. (2008). Beyond reciprocity: Gratitude and relationships in everyday life. Emotion, 8, 425–429.
2.
AronA.DaviesK. M. (2009). Aristotle and Plato on relationships. In ReisH. T.SprecherS. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Human Relationships (Vol. 1, pp. 108–110). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3.
AschS. E. (1952). Social psychology. New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
4.
BaldwinM. W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 461–484.
5.
BaxterL. A.BullisC. (1986). Turning points in developing romantic relationships. Human Communication Research, 12, 469–493.
6.
BerscheidE. (2010). Love in the fourth dimension. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 1–25.
7.
BolgerN.AmarelD. (2007). Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: Experimental evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 458–475.
8.
BolgerN.DavisA.RafaeliE. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579–616.
9.
BolgerN.LaurenceauJ.-P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal designs. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10.
BolgerN.ZuckermanA.KesslerR. C. (2000). Invisible support and adjustment to stress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 953–961.
11.
BradburyT. N.FinchamF. D.BeachS. R. (2004). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 964–980.
12.
BrownS. L.NesseR. M.VinokurA. D.SmithD. M. (2003). Providing social support may be more beneficial than receiving it results from a prospective study of mortality. Psychological Science, 14, 320–327.
13.
BussD. M.CraikK. H. (1983). The act frequency approach to personality. Psychological Review, 90, 105–126.
14.
ClarkM. S.LemayJr., E. P.GrahamS. M.PatakiS. P.FinkelE. J. (2010). Ways of giving benefits in marriage: Norm use, relationship satisfaction, and attachment-related variability. Psychological Science, 21, 944–951.
15.
ClarkM. S.MillsJ. (2012). Communal (and exchange) relationships. In Van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 232–250). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
16.
CoontzS. (2005). Marriage: A history. New York, NY: Penguin.
17.
CrockerJ.CanevelloA. (2008). Creating and undermining social support in communal relationships: The role of compassionate and self-image goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 555–575.
18.
FehrB.SprecherS. (2009). Compassionate love: Conceptual, measurement, and relational issues. In FehrB.SprecherS.UnderwoodL. G. (Eds.), The science of compassionate love (pp. 27–52). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
19.
FehrB.SprecherS.UnderwoodL. G. (Eds.) (2009). The science of compassionate love. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
20.
FinkenauerC.RighettiF. (2011). Understanding in close relationships: An interpersonal approach. In StroebeW.HewstoneM. (Eds.), European review of social psychology (pp. 316–363). Brighton, UK: Psychology Press.
21.
FinkenauerC.Wijngaards-DeMeijReisH. T.RusbultC. E. (2010). The importance of seeing what is not there: A quasi-signal detection analysis of positive and negative behavior in newlywed couples. Personal Relationships, 17, 615–633.
22.
FletcherG. J. O.KerrP. S. G. (2010). Through the eyes of love: Reality and illusion in intimate relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 627–658.
23.
FloydK. (2006). Communicating affection. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
24.
GableS. L.ReisH. T.DowneyG. (2003). He said, she said: A quasi-signal detection analysis of daily interactions between close relationship partners. Psychological Science, 14, 100–105.
25.
GleasonM. E. J.IidaM.BolgerN.ShroutP. E. (2003). Daily supportive equity in close relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1036–1045.
26.
GleasonM. E. J.IidaM.ShroutP. E.BolgerN. (2008). Receiving support as a mixed blessing: Evidence for dual effects of support on psychological outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 824–838.
27.
GrahamT.IckesW. (Eds.) (1997) When women’s intuition isn’t greater than men’s. In IckesW. (Ed.), Empathic accuracy (pp. 117–143). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
28.
HendrickC.HendrickS. S. (2006). Styles of romantic love. In SternbergR. J.WeisK. (Eds.), The new psychology of love (pp. 149–170). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
29.
HindeR. A. (1995). A suggested structure for a science of relationships. Personal Relationships, 2, 1–15.
30.
KarneyB. R.BradburyT. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3–34.
31.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
32.
KennyD. A.LedermannT. (2010). Detecting, measuring, and testing dyadic patterns in the actor–partner interdependence model. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 359–366.
33.
KurdekL. A. (1998). Developmental changes in marital satisfaction: A 6-year prospective longitudinal study of newlywed couples. In BradburyT. N. (Ed.), The developmental course of marital dysfunction (pp.180–204). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
34.
KurdekL. A. (1999). The nature and predictors of the trajectory of change in marital quality for husbands and wives over the first 10 years of marriage. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1283–1296.
35.
LemayJr., E. P.ClarkM. S. (2008). How the head liberates the heart: Projection of communal responsiveness guides relationship promotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 647–671.
36.
MacGeorgeE. L.FengB.BurlesonB. R. (2011). Supportive communication. In M. A. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of Interpersonal Communication (pp. 317–354). Sage.
37.
MikulincerM.ShaverP. (2007). Attachment patterns in adulthood: Structure, dynamics, and change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
38.
MurrayS. L. (1999). The quest for conviction: Motivated cognition in romantic relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 23–34.
39.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G. (2011). Interdependent minds. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
40.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.BellaviaG.GriffinD. W.DoldermanD. (2002). Kindred spirits? The benefits of egocentrism in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 563–581.
41.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G.CollinsN. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 641–666.
42.
NeffL. A.KarneyB. R. (2005). To know you is to love you: The implications of global adoration and specific accuracy for marital relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 480–497.
43.
NeffL. A.KarneyB. R. (2009). Compassionate love in early marriage. In FehrB.SprecherS.UnderwoodL. G. (Eds.), The science of compassionate love (pp. 201–221). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
44.
OverallN. C.SimpsonJ. A, (2013). Regulation processes in close relationships. In SimpsonJ. A.CampbellL. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 427–451). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
45.
RafaeliE.GleasonM. E. J. (2009). Skilled support within intimate relationships. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 1, 20–37.
46.
RaudenbushS. W.BrennanR. T.BarnettR. C. (1995). A multivariate hierarchical model for studying psychological change within married couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 161–174.
47.
ReisH. T.AronA. (2008). Love: What is it, why does it matter, and how does it operate?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 80–86.
48.
ReisH. T.CarmichaelC. (2006). Perceived partner regard and interaction in close relationships. Unpublished manuscript, University of Rochester.
49.
ReisH. T.ClarkM. S. (2013). Responsiveness. In SimpsonJ. A.CampbellL. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 400–423). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
50.
ReisH. T.ClarkM. S.HolmesJ. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In MashekD.AronA. (Eds.), The handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201–225). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
51.
ReisH. T.GableS. L.ManiaciM. R. (in press). Methods for studying everyday experience in its natural context. In ReisH. T.JuddC. (Eds.) Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
52.
ReisH. T.PatrickB. C. (1996). Attachment and intimacy: Component processes. In KruglanskiA.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 523–563). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
53.
ReisH. T.ShaverP. R. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In DuckS. (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 367–389). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
54.
RusbultC. E.KumashiroM.StockerS. L.WolfS. T. (2005). The Michelangelo phenomenon in close relationships. In TesserA.WoodJ. V.StapelD. A. (Eds.), On building, defending, and regulating the self: A psychological perspective (pp. 1–29). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
55.
RusbultC. E.OlsenN.DavisJ. L.HannonP. A. (2001). Commitment and relationship maintenance mechanisms. In HarveyJ. H.WenzelA. (Eds.), Close romantic relationships: Maintenance and enhancement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
56.
SchwarzN. (2012). Why researchers should think “real-time”: A cognitive rationale. In MehlM. R.ConnerT. S. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 22–42). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
57.
SprecherS.Toro-MornM. (2002). A study of men and women from different sides of earth to determine if men are from Mars and women are from Venus in their beliefs about love and romantic relationships. Sex Roles, 46, 131–147.
58.
ThomasG.FletcherG. J. O. (1997). Empathic accuracy in close relationships. In IckesW. (Ed.), Empathic accuracy (pp. 218–250). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
59.
UnderwoodL. G. (2009). Compassionate love: A framework for research. In FehrB.SprecherS.UnderwoodL. G. (Eds.), The science of compassionate love (pp. 3–25). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
60.
WeiselquistJ.RusbultC. E.FosterC. A.AgnewC. R. (1999). Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 942–966.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
