Given previous research on the risks associated with cycling in young adult dating relationships, the present study examines the frequency with which cyclical dating relationships (relationships that end and renew) persist into cohabitation and marriage, the characteristics of these relationships, and the constraints associated with cycling during these stages using a nationally representative sample of cohabiting (n = 323) and married (n = 752) couples. Using retrospective accounts, results suggest that over one-third of cohabiters and one-fifth of spouses have experienced a breakup and renewal in their current relationship. Additionally, partners who have experienced cycling are at greater risk for further cycling and experiencing greater constraints to permanently ending the relationship, greater uncertainty in their relationship’s future, and lower satisfaction.
AmatoP. R. (2011) Relationship sequences and trajectories: Women’s family formation pathways in emerging adulthood. In FinchamF. D.CuiM. (Eds.), Romantic relationships in emerging adulthood (pp. 27–43). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AndersonJ. R.Van RyzinM. J.DohertyW. J. (2010). Developmental trajectories of marital happiness in continuously married individuals: A group-based modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 587–596.
3.
Arnett, J. J. (2005). Emerging adulthood: Understanding a new way of coming of age. In J. J. Arnett & J. L. Tanner (Eds.), Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century(pp. 3–19). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
4.
BinstockG.ThorntonA. (2003). Separations, reconciliations, and living apart in cohabiting and marital unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 432–443. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00432.x
5.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
CutronaC. E.RussellD. W.BurzetteR. G.WesnerK. A.BryantC. M. (2011). Predicting relationship stability among midlife African American couples. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 814–825. doi:10.1037/a0025874
7.
DaileyR. M.JinB.PfiesterA.BeckG. (2011). On-again/off-again dating relationships: What keeps partners coming back?Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 417–440. doi:10.1080/00224545.2010.503249
8.
DaileyR. M.MiddletonA. V.GreenE. W. (2012). Perceived relational stability in on-again/off-again relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, 52–76. doi:10.1177/0265407511420192
9.
DaileyR. M.PfiesterA.JinB.BeckG.ClarkG. (2009). On-again/off-again dating relationships: How are they different from other dating relationships?Personal Relationships, 16, 23–47. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01208.x
10.
DaileyR. M.RossettoK. R.PfiesterA.SurraC. A. (2009). A qualitative analysis of on-again/off-again romantic relationships: “It’s up and down, all around.”Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 443–466. doi:10.1177/0265407509351035
11.
Gibson-DavisC. M.EdinK.McLanahanS. (2005). High hopes but even higher expectations: The retreat from marriage among low-income couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 1301–1312. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00218.x
12.
Halpern-MeekinS.ManningW. D.GiordanoP. C.LongmoreM. A. (2013a). Relationship churning, physical violence, and verbal abuse in young adult relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 2–12. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.01029.x
13.
Halpern-MeekinS.ManningW. D.GiordanoP.LongmoreM. (2013b). Relationship churning in emerging adulthood: On/off relationships and sex with an ex. Journal of Adolescent Research, 28, 166–188. doi:10.1177/0743558412464524
14.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
15.
KlineG. H.StanleyS. M.MarkmanH. J.Olmos-GalloP. A.StPetersM.WhittonS. M.PradoL. M. (2004). Timing is everything: Pre-engagement cohabitation has increased risk for poor marital outcomes. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 311–318. doi:10.1037/ 0893-3200.18.2.311
16.
KnoesterC.BoothA. (2000). Barriers to divorce: When are they effective? When are they not?Journal of Family Issues, 21, 78–99. doi:10.1177/019251300021001004
LindsayJ. M. (2000). An ambiguous commitment: Moving in to a cohabiting relationship. Journal of Family Studies, 6, 120–134.
19.
ManningW. D. (2004). Children and the stability of cohabiting couples. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 674–689. doi:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00046.x
20.
ManningW. D.SmockP. J. (1995). Why Marry? Race and the transition to marriage among cohabiters. Demography, 32, 509–520. doi:10.2307/2061671
21.
ReedJ. M. (2006). No crossing the “extra line”: How cohabiters with children view their unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68: 1117–1131. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00318.x
22.
RhoadesG. K. (2005) A longitudinal study of cohabiting couples’ reasons for cohabitation, relationship quality, and psychological well-being. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations. (AAT 3278541)
23.
RhoadesG. K.StanleyS. M.MarkmanH. K. (2010). Should I stay or should I go? Predicting relationship stability from four aspects of commitment. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 543–550. doi:10.1037/a0021008.
24.
RusbultC. E. (1983). A longitudinal test of the investment model: The development (and deterioration) of satisfaction and commitment in heterosexual involvements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 101–117. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.1.101
25.
SchnellerD. P.ArdittiJ. A. (2004). After the breakup: Interpreting divorce and rethinking intimacy. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 42, 1–37. doi:10.1300/J087v42n01_01
26.
StanleyS. M.MarkmanH. J. (1992). Assessing commitment in personal relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 54, 595–608. doi:10.2307/353245
27.
StanleyS. M.RhoadesG. K.AmatoP. R.MarkmanH. J.JohnsonC. A. (2010). The timing of cohabitation and engagement: Impact on first and second marriages. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 906–918. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.20.1.117
28.
StanleyS. M.RhoadesG. K.MarkmanH. J. (2006). Sliding versus deciding: Inertia and the premarital cohabitation effect. Family Relations, 55, 499–509. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00418.x
29.
StanleyS. M.RhoadesG. K.WhittonS. W. (2010). Commitment: Functions, formation, and the securing of romantic attachment. Journal of Family Theory and Review, 2, 243–257. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00060.x
30.
SurraC. A.HughesD. K., (1997). Commitment processes in accounts of the development of premarital relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 59, 5–21.
31.
TachL.EdinK. (2011). The relationship contexts of young disadvantaged men. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 635, 76–94. doi:10.1177/0002716210393680
32.
VennumA. V. (2011). Understanding young adult cyclical relationships. (Doctoral dissertation) Retrieved fromhttp://etd.lib.fsu.edu/.
33.
WhiteL. K.BoothA. (1991). Divorce over the life course: The role of marital happiness. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 5–21. doi: 10.1177/019251391012001002.
34.
WinebergH. (1994). Marital reconciliation in the United States: Which couples are successful?Journal of Marriage and Family, 56, 80–88.
