Demand–withdraw patterns of spousal response to family conflict were examined among 83 couples living in a stepfamily context. Using daily process methods, husbands and wives were each asked to report separately on incidents of relationship conflict, responses to this conflict, and subsequent negative affect for a period of seven consecutive days. Data were analyzed using multilevel modeling and interpreted from a dyadic coping perspective. Findings indicated that when husbands engaged in demand or withdraw responses both members of the dyad subsequently reported declines in mood. Wives demanding and withdrawing had no significant cross-spousal impact. Of particular interest was the finding that husbands’ use of confrontive demanding exacerbated the negative impact of wives’ withdrawal on wives’ mood.
BolgerN.StadlerG.PaprockiC.DeLongisA. (2009). Grounding social psychology in behavior in daily life: The case of conflict and distress in couples. In AgnewC. R.CarlstonD. E.GrazianoW. G.KellyJ. R. (Eds.), Then a miracle occurs: Focusing on behavior in social psychological theory and research (pp. 368–390). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
ChiswickC.LehrerE. (1990). On marriage specific human capital: Its role as a determinant of remarriage. Journal of Population Economics, 3(3), 193–213.
3.
ChristensenA. (1988). Dysfunctional interaction patterns in couples. In FitzpatrickP. N. M. A. (Ed.), Perspectives on marital interaction (pp. 31–52). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
4.
ChristensenA.HeaveyC. L. (1990). Gender and social structure in the demand/withdraw pattern of marital conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 73–81.
5.
ChristensenA.HeaveyC. L. (1993). Gender differences in marital conflict: The demand/withdraw interaction pattern. In OskampS.CostanzoM. (Eds.), Gender issues in contemporary society (pp. 113–141). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6.
CookW. L.KennyD. A. (2005). The actor-partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(2), 101–109.
7.
DeLongisA.CapreolM. J.HoltzmanS.O'BrienT. B.CampbellJ. (2004). Social support and social strain among husbands and wives: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(3), 470–479.
8.
DeLongisA.HoltzmanS.PutermanE.LamM. (2010). Spousal support and dyadic coping in times of stress. In DavilaJ.SullivanK. (Eds.), Social support processes in intimate relationships (pp. 151–174). New York, NY: Oxford Press.
9.
DerogatisL. R. (1975). The affects balance scale. Baltimore, MD: Clinical Psychometric Research.
10.
GlickP.LinS-L. (1987). Remarriage after divorce: Recent changes and demographic variations. Social Perspectives, 30(2), 162–179.
11.
GottmanJ. M.KrokoffL. J. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57(1), 47–52.
12.
HagedoornM.PutermanE.SandermanR.WiggersT.BaasP. C.van HaastertM.DeLongisA. (2011). Is self-disclosure in couples coping with cancer associated with improvement in depressive symptoms?Health Psychology. 20(6), 753–762.
13.
HeaveyC. L.ChristensenA.MalamuthN. M. (1995). The longitudinal impact of demand and withdrawal during marital conflict. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63(5), 797–801.
14.
HeaveyC. L.LayneC.ChristensenA. (1993). Gender and conflict structure in marital interaction: A replication and extension. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(1), 16–27.
15.
KennyD. A.KashyD. A.CookW. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
16.
Lee-BaggleyD.PreeceM.DeLongisA. (2005). Coping with interpersonal stress: Role of the big five traits. Journal of Personality, 73(5), 1141–1180.
17.
MarinT. J.HoltzmanS.DeLongisA.RobinsonL. (2007). Coping and the response of others. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24(6), 951–969.
18.
PreeceM.DeLongisA. (2005). A contextual examination of stress and coping processes in stepfamilies. In RevensonT. A. R.KayserK. (Eds.), Coping among couples (pp. 51–69). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
19.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA.CheongY. F.CongdonR.du ToitM. (2004). HLM6: SSI Scientific Software International. Hierarchical Linear and Nonlinear Modeling. Linkolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
20.
SchwartzJ. E.StoneA. A. (1998). Strategies for analyzing ecological momentary assessment data. Health Psychology, 17(1), 6–16.
21.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.
22.
ZwickerA.DeLongisA. (2010). Gender differences in stress and coping. In ChrislerJ. C.McCrearyD. R. (Eds.), Handbook of gender research in psychology: Vol. 2. Gender research in social and applied psychology (pp. 495–512). New York, NY: Springer Press.
