Most past research on apologies examines participants’ responses to imaginary transgressions or minor offenses against strangers. This research consequently neglects how the quality of pre-existing relationships might influence responses to apologies in everyday life. I examined whether relationship satisfaction moderated the association between apologies and forgiveness in romantic relationships by influencing perceptions of apology sincerity. Members of 60 married or cohabiting couples first assessed their relationship satisfaction. Participants then completed daily diaries, reporting transgressions by their partners, apologies by their partners, perceived apology sincerity, and willingness to forgive their partners. Apologies predicted forgiveness only for participants highly satisfied with their relationships. In addition, relationship satisfaction was positively associated with participants' ratings of the sincerity of the apologies, which in turn predicted forgiveness. The findings suggest that, relative to less satisfied individuals, highly satisfied individuals are more forgiving following apologies, because they regard their partners’ apologies as sincere expressions of remorse.
AllemandM.AmbergI.ZimprichD.FinchamF. D. (2007). The role of trait forgiveness and relationship satisfaction in episodic forgiveness. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 199–217.
2.
BavelasJ. (2004). An analysis of formal apologies by Canadian churches to First Nations. Occasional Paper No. 1, Centre for Studies in Religion & Society, University of Victoria.
3.
BennettM.EarwakerD. (1994). Victims' responses to apologies: The effects of offender responsibility and offense severity. The Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 457–464.
4.
BrooksR. L. (Ed.). (1999). When sorry isn’t enough: The controversy over apologies and reparations for human injustice. New York: New York University Press.
5.
DarbyB. W.SchlenkerB. R. (1982). Children's reactions to apologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 742–753.
6.
DayM. V.RossM. (2011). The value of remorse: How drivers' responses to police predict fines for speeding. Law and Human Behavior, 35, 221–234.
7.
ExlineJ. J.DeSheaL.HolemanV. T. (2007). Is apology worth the risk? Predictors, outcomes, and ways to avoid regret. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 26, 479–504.
8.
ExlineJ. J.WorthingtonE. L.HillP.McCulloughM. E. (2003). Forgiveness and justice: A research agenda for social and personality psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 337–348.
9.
FinchamF. D. (2009). Forgiveness: Integral to a science of close relationships? In MikulincerM.ShaverP. (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior (pp. 347–365). Washington, DC: APA Books.
10.
FinkelE. J.RushbultC. E.KumashiroM.HannonP. A. (2002). Dealing with betrayal in close relationships: Does commitment promote forgiveness?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 956–974.
11.
GagneF. B.LydonJ. E. (2003). Identification and the commitment shift: Accounting for gender differences in relationship illusions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 907–919.
12.
GibneyM.Howard-HassmanR. E.CoicaudJ.SteinerN. (2008). The Age of apology: Facing up to the past. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 2, 429–430.
13.
GoffmanE. (1962). On cooling the mark out: Some aspects of adaptation to failure. In RoseA. M. (Ed.), Human behavior and social processes (pp. 482–505). Cambridge, MA: The Riverside Press.
14.
GottmanJ. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
GottmanJ. M.LevensonR. W. (1992). Marital processes predictive of later dissolution: Behaviour, physiology, and health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 221–233.
HoB. (2007). Apologies as signals: With evidence from a trust game. SSRN eLibrary.
18.
HolmesJ. (1989). Sex differences and apologies: One aspect of communicative competence. Applied Linguistics, 10, 194–213.
19.
KearnsJ. N.FinchamF. D. (2005). Victim and perpetrator accounts of interpersonal transgressions: Self-serving or relationship-serving biases?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 321–333.
20.
LawlerK. A.YoungerJ. W.PiferiR. L.JobeR. L.EdmondsonK. A.JonesW. H. (2005). The unique effects of forgiveness on health: An exploration of pathways. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 28, 157–167.
21.
LazareA. (2004). On apology. New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
MacKinnonD. P.LockwoodC. M.HoffmanJ. M.WestS. G.SheetsV. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104.
23.
MargolinM. J.WampoldB. E. (1981). A sequential analysis of conflict and accord in distressed and nondistressed marital partners. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 554–567.
24.
MarigoldD. C.HolmesJ. G.RossM. (2007). More than words: Reframing compliments from romantic partners fosters security in low self-esteem individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 232–248.
25.
McCulloughM. E. (2008). Beyond revenge. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
26.
McCulloughM. E.RachalK. C.SandageS. J.WorthingtonE. L.Jr.BrownS. W.HightT. L. (1998). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships: II. Theoretical elaboration and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1586–1603.
27.
McNultyJ. K. (2010). When positive processes hurt relationships. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 167–171.
MoldenD. C.FinkelE. J. (2010). Motivations for promotion and prevention and the role of trust and commitment in interpersonal forgiveness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 255–268.
30.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G. (1993). Seeing virtues in faults: Negativity and the transformation of interpersonal narratives in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 707–722.
31.
RisenJ. L.GilovichT. (2007). Target and observer differences in the acceptance of questionable apologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 418–433.
32.
ScherS. J.DarleyJ. M. (1997). How effective are the things people say to apologize? Effects of the realization of the apology speech act. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 127–140.
33.
SchmittM.GollwitzerM.ForsterN.MontadaL. (2004). Effects of objective and subjective account components on forgiving. Journal of Social Psychology, 144, 465–485.
34.
SchumannK.RossM. (2010). Why women apologize more than men: Gender differences in thresholds for offensive behavior. Psychological Science, 21, 1649–1655.
35.
SearleJ. R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5, 1–23.
36.
SegalE. (1970). Love story. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.
37.
StruthersC. W.EatonJ.SantelliA. G.UchiyamaM.ShirvaniN. (2008). The effects of attributions of intent and apology on forgiveness: When saying sorry may not help the story. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 983–992.
38.
TavuchisN. (1991). Mea culpa. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
39.
TaylorS. E.BrownJ. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210.
40.
TomlinsonE. C.DineenB. R.LewickiR. J. (2004). The road to reconciliation: Antecedents of victim willingness to reconcile following a broken promise. Journal of Management, 30, 165–187.
41.
ToussaintL. L.WilliamsD. R.MusickM. A.EversonS. A. (2001). Forgiveness and health: age differences in a US probability sample. Journal of Adult Development, 8, 249–257.
42.
WilsonT.MilosevicA.CarrollM.HartK.HibbardS. (2008). Physical health status in relation to self-forgiveness and other-forgiveness in healthy college students. Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 798–803.
43.
ZechmeisterJ. S.GarciaS.RomeroC.VasS. N. (2004). Don’t apologize unless you mean it: A laboratory investigation of forgiveness and retaliation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 532–564.
