A rational-theoretical approach to scale development was employed to develop and evaluate a scale to measure submissive communication in personal relationships. A convergence communication pattern compels submissive relational partners to interpret the world around them in ways consistent with dominant partners. This study was guided by two aims: (1) to develop a valid and reliable measure of convergence communication – the Convergence Communication Scale – and (2) to conduct a preliminary examination of the effects of convergence communication on submissive partners’ mental health. A measurement instrument was developed (α = .95) and tested in two separate administrations (N = 379; N = 373), revealing associations between convergence communication, depression, and learned helplessness for both males and females, predicting depression specifically for females.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2.
BeattyM. J.DobosJ. A. (1992). Relationship between sons’ perceptions of fathers’ messages and satisfaction in adult sons father relationships. Southern Communication Journal, 57, 277–284.
3.
BeckA. T. (1967). Depression: Clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects. New York: Hoeber.
4.
BeckA. T. (1974). The development of depression: A cognitive model. In FriedmanR. J.KatzM. M. (Eds.), The psychology of depression: Contemporary theory and research. Washington, DC: V.H. Winston.
5.
BeckA. T.SteerR. A.BrownG. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
6.
BergerC. R. (1994). Power, dominance, and social interaction. In KnappM.MillerG. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 450–507). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
BurgoonJ. K. HaleJ. L. (1984). The fundamental topoi of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 51, 193–214.
8.
BergerC. R. (2005). Interpersonal communication: Theoretical perspectives, future prospects. Journal of Communication, 55, 415–447.
9.
BurgoonJ. K.DillmanL. (1995). Gender, immediacy, and nonverbal communication. In KalbfleischP. J.CodyM. J. (Eds.), Gender, power and communication in human relationships (pp. 63–81). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
BurgoonJ. K.DunbarN. (2000). An interactionist perspective on dominance-submission: Interpersonal dominance as a dynamic, situationally contingent social skill. Communication Monographs, 67, 96–121.
11.
BurgoonJ. K.JohnsonM. L.KochP. T. (1998).The nature and measurement of interpersonal dominance. Communication Monographs, 65, 308–335.
12.
CourtrightJ. A.MillarF. E. Rogers-MillarL. E. (1979).Domineeringness and dominance: Replication and expansion. Communication Monographs, 46, 179–192.
13.
DeVellisR. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and application (2nd ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14.
DillardJ. P.SolomonD. H.SampJ. A. (1996). Framing social reality: The reality of social judgments. Communication Research, 23, 703–723.
15.
DunbarN. E.BurgoonJ. K. (2005a). Measuring nonverbal dominance. In ManusovV. (Ed.), The sourcebook of nonverbal measures: Going beyond words. (pp. 361–374). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
16.
DunbarN. E.BurgoonJ. K. (2005b). Perceptions of power and interactional dominance in interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 207–233.
17.
GilesH.TaylorD. M.BourisR. Y. (1973). Towards a theory of interpersonal accommodation through language: Some Canadian data. Language in Society, 2, 177-192.
18.
GraesserA. C.McNamaraD. S.LouwerseM. M.CaiZ. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on comprehension and language. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 36, 193–202.
19.
HammenC. (1991). Depression runs in families: The social context of risk and resilience in children of depressed mothers. New York: Springer.
20.
KrippendorffK. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21.
LanyonR.GoodsteinL. (1971). Personality assessment. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
22.
LearyT. F. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald Press.
23.
Leeds-HurwitzW. (2006). Social theories: Social constructionism and symbolic interactionism. In BraithwaiteD. O.BaxterL. A. (Eds.), Engaging theories in family communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 229–242). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
MaierS. F.SeligmanM. E. P. (1976). Learned helplessness: Theory and evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 105, 3–46.
25.
McCannR. M.OtaH.GilesH.CarakerR. (2003). Accommodation and nonaccommodation across the lifespan: Perspectives from Thailand, Japan, and the United States of America. Communication Reports, 16, 1–23.
26.
MillarF. E.RogersL. E. (1976). A relational approach to interpersonal communication. In MillerG. R. (Ed.), Explorations in interpersonal communication (pp.87–104). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27.
Miller-DayM. (in press). Two of me: Mothers and daughters in connection. In
DeakinsA.LockridgeR.SterkH. (Eds.), Mothers and daughters: Complicated connections across cultures (pp.89–104). Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield Publishers.
28.
Miller-DayM. (2005). Necessary convergence of meaning in interpersonal relationships. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Convention in New York.
29.
Miller-DayM. (2012). Two of me: Mothers and daughters in connection. In DeakinsA.LockridgeR.SterkH. (Eds.), Mothers and daughters: Complicated connections across cultures (pp. 89–104). University Press of America.
30.
Miller-DayM.DavisJ. L. (2006). Perceptions of parental communication orientation, perfectionism, and disordered eating behaviors of sons and daughters. Health Communication, 19, 153–163.
31.
Miller-DayM.FisherC. (2008). Family communication and disordered eating patterns. International Journal of Psychology Research, 3, 1–26.
32.
Miller-DayM.KamJ. (2009). Investigating communication in families: Children, parents, and grandparents. In EadieW. F. (Ed.), 21st century communication: A reference handbook (Vol. 1; pp. 303–312). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
33.
Miller-DayM. A. (2004). Communication among grandmothers, mothers, and adult daughters: A qualitative study of maternal relationships. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34.
NoarS. M.MorokoffP. J. (2002). The relationships between masculinity ideology, condom attitudes, and condom use: Stage of change; a structural equation modeling approach. International Journal of Men’s Health, 1, 43–59.
35.
PetersonC. (1993). Helpless behavior. Behavioral Research Therapy, 31, 289–295.
36.
PiccinelliM.WilkinsonG. (2000). Gender differences in depression: Critical review. British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 486–492.
37.
RandA. (1943). The fountainhead. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.
38.
RogersL. E.FaraceR. V. (1975). Relational communication analysis: New measurement procedures. Human Communication Research, 1, 222–229.
39.
SapnasK. G.ZellerR. A. (2002). Minimizing sample size when using exploratory factor analysis for measurement. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 10, 135–154.
40.
SimondsS. L. (2001). Depression and women: An integrative approach. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
41.
VictoraC. G.HuttlyS. R.FuchsS. C.OlintoM. T. A. (1997). The role of conceptual frameworks in epidemiological analysis: a hierarchical approach. International Journal of Epidemiology, 26, 224–227.
42.
WoodJ. T. (2001). The normalization of violence in heterosexual romantic relationships: Women’s narratives of love and violence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 239–262.
