Using a cognitive dissonance framework, this research tried to identify predictors of openness toward divorce and trivialization of wedding vows. Using single undergraduates, Study 1 showed that those reminded of traditional (divorce-inconsistent) wedding vows reported less openness toward divorce than those not reminded (possibly indicative of dissonance-induced attitude change). Study 1 also showed that those who received social-comparison (divorce-rate) information were more likely to trivialize the vows than those who did not receive such information. Study 2 showed that marital status moderated these two primary effects: married individuals showed a stronger vow-reminder effect than divorced individuals, and divorced individuals showed a stronger social-comparison effect. Study 2 also demonstrated pluralistic ignorance in that participants took divorce more seriously than they thought “other people” did. Other results, implications, and counseling applications are discussed.
AmatoP. R. (2000). The consequences of divorce for adults and children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1269–1287.
2.
AmatoP. R.PrevitiD. (2003). People’s reasons for divorcing: Gender, social class, the life course, and adjustment. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 602–626.
3.
AronsonE. (1992). The return of the repressed: Dissonance theory makes a comeback. Psychological Inquiry, 3, 303–311.
4.
CarrollJ. S.DohertyW. J. (2003). Evaluating the effectiveness of premarital prevention programs: A meta-analytic review of outcome research. Family Relations, 52, 105–118.
5.
CherlinA. J. (2009). The marriage-go-round: The state of marriage and the family in America today. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
6.
CooperJ. (2007). Cognitive dissonance: Fifty years of a classic theory. Los Angeles: Sage.
7.
DonovanR. L.JacksonB. L. (1990). Deciding to divorce: A process guided by social exchange, attachment and cognitive dissonance theories. Journal of Divorce, 13, 23–35.
8.
DremanS.OrrE.AldorR. (1989). Competence or dissonance? Divorcing mothers' perceptions of sense of competence and time perspective. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 405–415.
9.
FestingerL. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10.
FestingerL. (1999). Reflections on cognitive dissonance: 30 years later. In Harmon-JonesE.MillsJ. (Eds), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 381–385). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
11.
GeherG.BloodworthR.MasonJ.StoaksC.DowneyH. J.RenstromK. L.etal. (2005). Motivational underpinnings of romantic partner perceptions: Psychological and physiological evidence. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 255–281.
12.
Harmon-JonesE. (1999). Toward an understanding of the motivation underlying dissonance effects: Is the production of aversive consequences necessary? In Harmon-JonesE.MillsJ. (Eds), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 71–99). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
13.
HinesD.SarisR. N.Throckmorton-BelzerL. (2002). Pluralistic ignorance and health risk behaviors: Do college students misperceive social approval for risky behaviors on campus and in media?Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 2621–2640.
14.
JemmottJ. B. IIIDittoP. H.CroyleR. T. (1986). Judging health status: Effects of perceived prevalence and personal relevance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 899–905.
15.
JorgensenS. R.JohnsonA. C. (1980). Correlates of divorce liberality. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 617–626.
16.
McGeorgeC. R.CarlsonT. S. (2006). Premarital education: An assessment of program efficacy. Contemporary Family Therapy, 28, 165–190.
17.
McKimmieB. M.TerryD. J.HoggM. A.MansteadA. S. R.SpearsR.DoosjeB. (2003). I’m a hypocrite, but so is everyone else: Group support and the reduction of cognitive dissonance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7, 214–224.
18.
MooreC. W. (1988). Techniques to break impasse. In FolbergJ.MilneA. (Eds), Divorce mediation: Theory and practice (pp. 251–276). New York: Guilford.
19.
MyersD. G. (2005). Social psychology (8th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
20.
PlunkettJ. W.RiemerB.KalterN.AlpernD. (1985). Parents' beliefs about children’s reactions to divorce: The development of an assessment instrument. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 24, 334–337.
21.
PrenticeD. A.MillerD. T. (1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 243–256.
22.
RiggioH. R.FiteJ. E. (2006). Attitudes toward divorce: Embeddedness and outcomes in personal relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 36, 2935–2962.
23.
SimonL.GreenbergJ.BrehmJ. (1995). Trivialization: The forgotten mode of dissonance reduction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 247–260.
24.
StalderD. R.AmonM. (2008, May). Reducing divorce risk through premarital consideration of “for worse”: Preliminary evidence. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Psychological Science, Chicago.
25.
StalderD. R.BaronR. S. (1998). Attributional complexity as a moderator of dissonance-produced attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 449–455.
26.
StalderD. R.DevineP. G. (2002, August). Why does social comparison reduce dissonance?Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago.
27.
StanleyS. M. (2001). Making a case for premarital education. Family Relations, 50, 272–280.
28.
SteeleC. M.LiuT. J. (1983). Dissonance processes as self-affirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 5–19.
29.
SticeE.PresnellK.GauJ.ShawH. (2007). Testing mediators of intervention effects in randomized controlled trials: An evaluation of two eating disorder prevention programs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 20–32.
30.
StoneJ.FernandezN. C. (2008). To practice what we preach: The use of hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance to motivate behavior change. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1024–1051.
31.
TavrisC.AronsonE. (2007). Mistakes were made (but not by me): Why we justify foolish beliefs, bad decisions, and hurtful acts. Orlando: Harcourt.
32.
ThorntonA.Young-DeMarcoL. (2001). Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: The 1960s through the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 1009–1037.
33.
Vacha-HaaseT.ThompsonB. (2004). How to estimate and interpret various effect sizes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 473–481.
