This manuscript advances a mesolevel approach to everyday talk. Given frequent use of mediated communication within interpersonal relationships, we use a technique akin to multitrait/multimethod decomposition to separate content- and medium-specific variance sources. The results find that cross-sex friends enact everyday talk behaviors less frequently than do same-sex friends when communicating face-to-face and via telephone, but these differences do not emerge when online. After controlling for these sex differences, online communication attitudes predict everyday talk across specific media. Beyond offering methodological tools, these results may suggest cross-sex dyads communicate online to buffer against intimacy and thus preserve friendship as platonic.
Baxter, L.A., & Wilmot, W.W. ( 1983). Communication characteristics of relationships with different growth rates. Communication Monographs, 50, 264-272.
2.
Baym, N.K., & Ledbetter, A.M. (2009). Tunes that bind?: Predicting friendship strength in a music-based social network. Information, Communication & Society, 12, 408-427.
3.
Boneva, B., Quinn, A., Kraut, R.E., Kiesler, S., & Shklovski, I. ( 2006). Teenage communication in the instant messaging era. In R. Kraut, M. Brynin, & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Computers, phones, and the Internet: Domesticating information technology (pp. 201-218). New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
Boyd, D.M., & Ellison, N.B. ( 2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship . Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 13. Retrieved January 8, 2009, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html
5.
Campbell, D.T., & Fiske, D.W. ( 1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
6.
Caplan, S.E. ( 2007). Relations among loneliness, social anxiety, and problematic Internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 234-242.
7.
Chan, D.K.-S., & Cheng, G.H.-L. (2004). A comparison of offline and online friendship qualities at different stages of relational development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 305-320.
8.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S.G., & Aiken, L.S. ( 2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9.
Donath, J. ( 2007). Signals in social supernets. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13. Retrieved January 8, 2009, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/donath.html
10.
Duck, S. ( 1990). Relationships as unfinished business: Out of the frying pan and into the 1990s. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships , 7, 5-28.
11.
Duck, S., Rutt, D.J., Hurst, M.H., & Strejc, H. ( 1991). Some evident truths about conversations in everyday relationships: All communications are not created equal. Human Communication Research, 18, 228-267.
12.
Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. ( 2007). The benefits of Facebook ‘‘friends:’’ Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites . Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12. Retrieved January 8, 2009, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/ellison.html
13.
Fischer, C.S. ( 1992). America calling: A social history of the telephone to 1940. Berkeley: University of California .
14.
Goldsmith, D.J., & Baxter, L.A. ( 1996). Constituting relationships in talk: A taxonomy of speech events in social and personal relationships. Human Communication Research, 23, 87-114.
15.
Griffin, E., & Sparks, G.G. ( 1990). Friends forever: A longitudinal exploration of intimacy in same-sex friends and platonic pairs. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 29-46.
16.
Guerrero, L.K., & Chavez, A.M. ( 2005). Relational maintenance in cross-sex friendships characterized by different types of romantic intent: An exploratory study. Western Journal of Communication, 69, 339-358.
17.
Haythornthwaite, C. ( 2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication & Society, 8, 125-147.
18.
Kaplan, D.L., & Keyes, C.B. ( 1997). Sex and relationship variables as predictors of sexual attraction in cross-sex platonic friendships between young heterosexual adults . Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 14, 191-206.
19.
Keppel, G., & Wickens, T.D. ( 2004). Design and analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
20.
Keyton, J. ( 2006). Communication research: Asking questions, finding answers (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
21.
Kline, R.B. ( 2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
22.
Lacohée, H., & Anderson, B. ( 2001). Interacting with the telephone. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54, 665-669.
23.
Ledbetter, A.M. ( 2009a). Family communication patterns and relational maintenance behavior: Direct and mediated associations with friendship closeness. Human Communication Research, 35, 130-147.
24.
Ledbetter, A.M. ( 2009b). Measuring online communication attitude: Instrument development and validation. Communication Monographs, 76, 463-486.
25.
Ledbetter, A.M. (in press). Content- and medium-specific decomposition of relational maintenance behavior in friendships: Integrating equity and media multiplexity approaches . Journal of Social and Personal Relationships.
26.
Ling, R., & Yttri, B. ( 2002). Nobody sits at home and waits for the telephone to ring: Micro and hyper-coordination through the use of the mobile telephone. In J. Katz & M. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact (pp. 139-69). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
27.
Little, T.D., Cunningham, W.A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K.F. ( 2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151-173.
28.
O’Meara, J.D. ( 1989). Cross-sex friendship: Four basic challenges of an ignored relationship. Sex Roles, 21, 525-543.
29.
O’Sullivan, P.B. ( 2000). What you don’t know won’t hurt me: Impression management functions of communication channels in relationships. Human Communication Research, 26, 403-431.
30.
Parks, M.R., & Roberts, L.D. ( 1998). ‘‘Making MOOsic’’: The development of personal relationships on line and a comparison to their off-line counterparts . Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 517-537.
31.
Quan-Haase, A., Wellman, B., Witte, J.C., & Hampton, K.N. ( 2002). Capitalizing on the net: Social contact, civic engagement, and sense of community. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 291-324). Malden, MA: Blackwell .
32.
Schrodt, P., Braithwaite, D.O., Soliz, J., Tye-Williams, S., Miller, A., Normand, E.L., & Harrigan, M.M. (2007). An examination of everyday talk in stepfamily systems. Western Journal of Communication , 71, 216-234.
33.
Schrodt, P., Soliz, J., & Braithwaite, D.O. (2008). A social relations model of everyday talk and relational satisfaction in stepfamilies. Communication Monographs, 75, 190-217.
