Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This two-part study investigates new possibilities in our understanding of the nature of love. Evidence collected lends preliminary support to the following contentions: First, Persons’ concepts of human love of various kinds may not be, as widely maintained, Roschian prototypical ones, but may instead be definable, essentialist ones. Second, Foremost among love’s essential characteristics in terms of transcending four different kinds of love (romantic, parental, companionate, and altruistic) may be “Investment in the well-being of the other for his or her own sake.” Third, Persons’ models or prototypes of romantic, parental, companionate, and altruistic relationships may be different from and broader than their essentialist concepts of love itself of each of these kinds.

Keywords

companionate love compassionate love essentialist love (nature of)parental love prototype romantic love

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aron, A. , Fisher, H.E. , & Strong, G. ( 2006). Romantic love. In A. Vangelisti & D.Perlman (Eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships (pp. 595-614). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bergner, R. ( 2000). Love and barriers to love: An analysis for psychotherapists and others. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 54, 1-17.

Bergner, R. , & Davis, K. (September, 2007). Lay conceptions of romantic love: Essential components or only prototypical characteristics? Paper presented at the 29th Annual Conference of the Society for Descriptive Psychology, Golden, CO

Berscheid, E. ( 1985). Interpersonal attraction. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (3rd. ed., Vol. 2). New York: Random House.

Berscheid, E. ( 2006). Searching for the meaning of "love." In R. J. Sternberg & K. Weis (Eds.), The new psychology of love (pp. 171-183). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Bretscher, F. , & Bergner, R. ( 1991). Relational qualities as factors in mate selection decisions . In M. Roberts & R. Bergner (Eds.), Advances in Descriptive Psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 107-123). Ann Arbor, MI: Descriptive Psychology Press.

Clark, M. , & Mills, J. ( 1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 12-24.

Clark, M.S. & Monin, J.K. ( 2006). Giving and receiving communal responsiveness as love . In R. J. Sternberg & K. Weis (Eds.), The new psychology of love (pp. 200-224). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Davis, K.E. , & Todd, M. ( 1982). Friendship and love relationships. In K. E. Davis & T. O. Mitchell (Eds.) Advances in Descriptive Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 79-122).Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

10.

Fehr, B. ( 1988). Prototype analysis of the concepts of love and commitment . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 557-579.

11.

Fehr, B. ( 1993). How do I love thee? Let me consult my prototype. In S. Duck (Ed.), Understanding personal relationships: Vol. 1: Individuals in relationships (pp. 87-120). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

12.

Fehr, B. ( 2006). The prototype approach to studying love. In R. J. Sternberg & K. Weis (Eds.), The new psychology of love (pp. 225-248). New Haven: Yale University Press.

13.

Fehr, R. , & Sprecher, S. (July 23, 2004). Compassionate love: Conceptual, relational, and behavioral issues. Paper presented at the Conference for the International Association of Relationship Research, Madison, WI.

14.

Fehr, B. , Sprecher, S. , & Underwood, L. (Eds.). (2009). The science of compassionate love: Theory, research, and applications . Malden, MA: Blackwell Press.

15.

Hassebrauck, M. ( 1997). Cognitions of relationship quality: A prototype analysis of their structure and consequences. Personal Relationships , 4, 163-185.

16.

Hendrick, C. , & Hendrick, S. ( 2006). Styles of romantic love. In R. Sternberg & K. Weis (Eds.), The new psychology of love (pp. 149-170). New Haven: Yale University Press.

17.

Kelley, H.H. ( 1983). Love and commitment. In H. Kelley et al. (Eds.), Close relationships (p. 265-314). New York: W. H. Freeman.

18.

Lee, J.A. ( 1973). The colors of love. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

19.

Mervis, C. , & Rosch, E.H. ( 1981). "Categorization of Natural Objects," Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 89-113.

20.

Ossorio, P.G. ( 2006). The behavior of persons. Ann Arbor, MI: Descriptive Psychology Press.

21.

Rempel, J.K. , & Burris, C.T. ( 2005). Let me count the ways: An integrative theory of love and hate. Personal Relationships, 12, 297-313.

22.

Rosch, E.H. ( 1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology , 4, 328-350.

23.

Singer, I. ( 1984). The nature of love, Vol. 1: From Plato to Luther (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

24.

Sternberg, R.J. ( 1988). The triangle of love: Intimacy, passion, commitment. New York: Basic Books.

25.

Stemberg, R. ( 2006). A duplex theory of love. In R. Sternberg & K. Weis (Eds.), The new psychology of love. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

26.

Wittgenstein, L. ( 1953). Philosophical investigations. New York: MacMillan.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB