In this manuscript we explore the ways in which the marketplace metaphor resonates with online dating participants and how this conceptual framework influences how they assess themselves, assess others, and make decisions about whom to pursue. Taking a metaphor approach enables us to highlight the ways in which participants’ language shapes their self-concept and interactions with potential partners. Qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews with 34 participants from a large online dating site revealed that the marketplace metaphor was salient for participants, who employed several strategies that reflected the assumptions underlying the marketplace perspective (including resisting the metaphor). We explore the implications of this metaphor for romantic relationship development, such as the objectification of potential partners.
Ahuvia, A.C., & Adelman, M.B. ( 1993). Market metaphors for meeting mates. Research in Consumer Behavior, 6, 55-83.
2.
Arvidsson, A. ( 2006). ‘Quality singles’: Internet dating and the work of fantasy. New Media & Society, 8, 671-690.
3.
Bailey, B. ( 1988). From front porch to back seat: Courtship in twentieth-century America. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
4.
Baker, A.J. ( 2008). Down the rabbit hole: The role of place in the initiation and development of online relationships. In A. Barak (Ed.), Psychological aspects of cyberspace: Theory, research, applications (pp. 163-184). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Baxter, L. ( 1992). Root metaphors in accounts of developing romantic relationships . Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 9, 253-275.
6.
Baym, N. ( 2002). Interpersonal life online. In L. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), The handbook of new media (pp. 62-76). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
7.
Becker, G. ( 1973). A theory of marriage: Part I. The Journal of Political Economy, 81, 813-846. Becker, G. (1992). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
Blau, P. ( 1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley.
9.
Bracker, N. ( 2005). Accounting for the economy of metaphors and metaphors of economy. In N. Bracker & S. Herbrechter (Eds.), Critical studies: Metaphors of economy, (pp. 7-8). New York: Radopi .
10.
Burke, K. ( 1969). A grammar of motives. Berkeley, CA : University of California Press.
11.
Business Wire. (2008). Jupiter research sees steady growth for online personals, despite explosion of social networking. Retrieved June 2, 2008, from http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/home/permalink/?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20080211005037&newsLang=en
12.
Carl, W.J. & Duck, S.W. ( 2004). How to do things with relationships ... and how relationships do things with us. In P. Kalbfleisch (Ed.), Communication yearbook 28 (pp. 1-34). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.
Charmaz, K. ( 1994). Grounded theory in the 21st century: Applications for advancing social justice studies. In N. Denzin & Y.S. Lincold (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (1st ed., pp. 507-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
14.
Coupland, J. ( 1996). Dating advertisements: Discourses of the commodified self. Discourse & Society, 7 (20), 187-207.
15.
Culnan, M.J., & Markus, M.L. ( 1987). Information technologies. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 420-443). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
16.
Donath, J. & boyd, d. ( 2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22, 71-82.
17.
Duck, C. ( 1984). A rose is a rose (is a tadpole is a freeway is a film) is a rose. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 1, 507-510.
18.
Duck, S. ( 1973). Personality similarity and friendship choice: Similarity of what, when?Journal of Personality, 41, 525-558.
19.
Duck, S. ( 1991). Understanding relationships. New York : Guillford Press.
20.
Ellison, N., Heino, R., & Gibbs, J. ( 2006). Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11 (2), article 2.
Gibbs, J., Ellison, N., & Heino, R. ( 2006). Self-presentation in online personals: The role of Anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and success in Internet dating. Communication Research, 33, 152-177.
23.
Gottlieb, L. ( 2006, March). How do I love thee? The Atlantic , 297 (2), 58-70.
24.
Hatfield, E., Utne, M.K., & Traupmann, J. ( 1979). Equity theory and intimate relationships. In T. Huston & R. Burgess (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 99-133). New York: Academic Press.
25.
Heath, A. ( 1976). Rational choice & social exchange: A critique of exchange theory. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Hirschman, E.C. ( 1987). People as products: Analysis of a complex marketing exchange . Journal of Marketing, 51, 98-108.
27.
Hitsch, G.J., Hortacsu, A., & Ariely, D. ( 2006). What makes you click: Mate preferences and matching outcomes in online dating. MIT Sloan Research Paper No. 4603-06. Retrieved April 15, 2006, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=895442
28.
Huston, T.L., & Burgess, R.L. ( 1979). Social exchange in developing relationships: An overview . In T. Huston & R. Burgess (Eds.), Social exchange in developing relationships (pp. 3-28). New York: Academic Press.
29.
Lakoff, G. ( 1986). A figure of thought. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 1, 215-225.
30.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. ( 2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL : The University of Chicago Press.
31.
Larson, G., & Pepper, G. ( 2003). Strategies for managing multiple organizational identifications: A case of competing identities. Management Communication Quarterly , 16, 528-557.
32.
Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. ( 1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
33.
Lindlof, T.R., & Taylor, B.C. ( 2002). Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34.
Madden, M., & Lenhart, A. ( 2006). Online dating. Pew Internet & American Life Project . Retrieved June 2, 2008 from http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2006/PIP_Online_Dating.pdf
35.
Marley, C. ( 2007). Metaphors of identity in dating ads and newspaper articles . Text & Talk, 27 (1), 55-78.
36.
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
Mills, J., Bonner, A., & Francis, K. ( 2006). The development of constructivist grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 1-10.
38.
Napoli, P.M. ( 1999). The marketplace of ideas metaphor in communications regulation . Journal of Communication, 49, 151-169.
39.
Ortony, A. ( 1993). Metaphor and thought (2nd edn). New York: Cambridge University Press .
40.
Pepper, G.L., & Larson, G.S. ( 2006). Cultural identity tensions in a post-acquisition organization . Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34, pp. 49-71.
41.
Ramirez, A., & Broneck, K. ( 2009). ‘IM me’: Instant messaging as relational maintenance and everyday communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26, 291-314.
42.
Roloff, M.E. ( 1981). Interpersonal communication: The social exchange approach . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications .
43.
Searle, J. ( 1979). Metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 92-123). Cambridge , England: Cambridge University Press.
44.
Sprecher, S. ( 2001). A comparison of emotional consequences of and changes in equity over time using global and domain-specific measures of equity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 18, 477-501.
45.
Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. ( 2002). Liking some things (in some people) more than others: Partner preferences in romantic relationships and friends. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 463-481.
46.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. ( 1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47.
Toma, C., Hancock, J., & Ellison, N. ( 2008). Separating fact from fiction: An examination of deceptive self-presentation in online dating profiles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1023-1036.
48.
Walster, E., Walster, G., & Berscheid, E. ( 1978). Equity: Theory and research. Boston : Allyn and Bacon.
49.
Walther, J.B. ( 1993). Impression development in computer-mediated interaction . Western Journal of Communication, 57, 381-398.
50.
Walther, J.B. ( 1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23, 3-44.
51.
Walther, J.B., & Parks, M.R. ( 2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: Computer-mediated communication and relationships. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd edn, pp. 529-563). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Whitty, M. ( 2008). Revealing the ‘real’ me, searching for the ‘actual’ you: Presentations of self on an internet dating site . Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 1707-1723.
54.
Yin, R.K. ( 1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
55.
Zafirovski, M. ( 2005). Social exchange theory under scrutiny: A positive critique of its economic-behaviorist formulations. Electronic Journal of Sociology, 7, 1-40.
56.
Zey, M. ( 1992). Decision making: Alternatives to rational choice models . Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications .
